共 50 条
Is dentin biomodification with collagen cross-linking agents effective for improving dentin adhesion? A systematic review and meta-analysis
被引:3
|作者:
Silva, Julianne Coelho
[1
]
Cetira Filho, Edson Luiz
[1
]
de Barros Silva, Paulo Goberlanio
[2
]
Gurgel Costa, Fabio Wildson
[1
]
Aragao Saboia, Vicente de Paulo
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Fed Ceara, Dept Restorat Dent, Postgrad Program Dent, Monsenhor Furtado St 1273, BR-60430355 Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
[2] Unichristus, Dept Dent, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
关键词:
Adhesive;
Collagen;
Cross-linking agents;
Dentin;
Dentin-bonding agents;
SELF-ETCH;
MATRIX METALLOPROTEINASES;
MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES;
CLINICAL-EVALUATION;
UNIVERSAL ADHESIVE;
RESIN;
EPIGALLOCATECHIN-3-GALLATE;
RIBOFLAVIN;
ACID;
DEGRADATION;
D O I:
10.5395/rde.2022.47.e23
中图分类号:
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号:
1003 ;
摘要:
Objectives: The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the effectiveness of collagen cross-linking agents (CCLAs) used in combination with the adhesive technique in restorative procedures. Materials and Methods: In this systematic review, the authors followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. An electronic search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and DOSS, up to October 2020. The gray literature was also researched. Only randomized clinical trials were selected. Results: The selection process yielded 3 studies from the 838 retrieved. The addition of CCLAs in the retention of restorations increased the number of events. The postoperative sensitivity scores and marginal adaptation scores showed no significant difference between the CCLA and control groups, and the marginal pigmentation scores showed a significant increase in the CCLA group. There were no caries events in any group throughout the evaluation period. Conclusions: This systematic review showed that there is no clinical efficacy to justify the use of CCLAs in the protocols performed.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文