Peer Review and Medical Journals

被引:0
|
作者
Nugent, Kenneth [1 ,3 ]
Peterson, Christopher J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ Hlth Sci Ctr, Lubbock, TX USA
[2] Caril Med Ctr, Roanoke, VA USA
[3] Texas Tech Univ Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Internal Med, 3601 4th St, Lubbock, TX 79430 USA
关键词
medical publication; peer review; institutional responsibilities; DECLINE;
D O I
10.1177/21501319241252235
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Journal editors depend on peer reviewers to make decisions about submitted manuscripts. These reviewers help evaluate the methods, the results, the discussion of the results, and the overall organization and presentation of the manuscript. In addition, reviewers can help identify important mistakes and possible misconduct. Editors frequently have difficulty obtaining enough peer reviews which are submitted in a timely manner. This increases the workload of editors and journal managers and potentially delays the publication of clinical and research studies. This commentary discusses of the importance of peer reviews and make suggestions which potentially can increase the participation of academic faculty and researchers in this important activity.
引用
收藏
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Peer Review Process in Medical Journals
    Cho, Young Gyu
    Park, Hyun Ah
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2013, 34 (06): : 372 - 376
  • [2] Peer review of manuscripts submitted to medical journals
    Youssef, Mohamed Abdelfattah Mahmoud
    MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2012, 17 (02) : 139 - 143
  • [3] Peer review practices by medical imaging journals
    Kwee, Thomas C.
    Adams, Hugo J. A.
    Kwee, Robert M.
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [4] Peer review practices by medical imaging journals
    Thomas C. Kwee
    Hugo J. A. Adams
    Robert M. Kwee
    Insights into Imaging, 11
  • [5] Pattern of peer review proforma of medical journals of Pakistan
    Shah, Faaiz Ali
    Ali, Mian Amjad
    Nazar, Zahid
    Rasheed, Haroon Ur
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 35 (04) : 1013 - 1017
  • [6] Peer review of electronic journals
    Rowland, F
    FROM INFORMATION TO KNOWLEDGE, 2003, : 73 - 81
  • [7] Peer Review in Urology Journals: What Is the Best Peer Review Model?
    Kaplan-Marans, Elie
    Khurgin, Jacob
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 (01) : 14 - 16
  • [8] Frequency and patterns of editorial rejections (rejections without peer review) across medical journals
    Harikumar, Vishnu
    Reynolds, Kelly A.
    Christensen, Rachel E.
    Wan, Hoi Ting
    Winner, Rachael
    Ibrahim, Sarah A.
    Kang, Bianca Y.
    Fouque, Denis
    Poon, Emily
    Elston, Dirk M.
    Alam, Murad
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 87 (05) : 1127 - 1129
  • [9] Defining predatory journals: no peer review, no point
    Leonhard Dobusch
    Maximilian Heimstädt
    Katja Mayer
    Tony Ross-Hellauer
    Nature, 2020, 580 (7801) : 29 - 29
  • [10] The Peer Review Process in Science Education Journals
    Dale Baker
    Research in Science Education, 2002, 32 : 171 - 180