Locum doctor working and quality and safety: a qualitative study in English primary and secondary care

被引:3
作者
Ferguson, Jane [1 ,8 ]
Stringer, Gemma [2 ]
Walshe, Kieran [2 ]
Allen, Thomas [3 ,4 ]
Grigoroglou, Christos [3 ]
Ashcroft, Darren M. [5 ]
Kontopantelis, Evangelos [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Hlth Serv Management Ctr, Sch Social Policy, Birmingham, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Alliance Manchester Business Sch, Manchester, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Manchester Ctr Hlth Econ, Hlth Serv Res & Primary Care, Div Populat Hlth, Manchester, England
[4] Univ Southern Denmark, Danish Ctr Hlth Econ, Odense, Denmark
[5] Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Div Pharm & Optometry, NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Res Collabo, Manchester, England
[6] Univ Manchester, Div Informat Imaging & Data Sci, Manchester, England
[7] Univ Manchester, Ctr Primary Care, NIHR Sch Primary Care Res, Hlth Serv Res & Primary Care,Div Populat Hlth, Manchester, England
[8] Univ Birmingham, Hlth Serv Management Ctr, Birmingham, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Governance; Health services research; Patient safety; Qualitative research; Quality improvement; PATIENT SAFETY; TEAMWORK;
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016699
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The use of temporary doctors, known as locums, has been common practice for managing staffing shortages and maintaining service delivery internationally. However, there has been little empirical research on the implications of locum working for quality and safety. This study aimed to investigate the implications of locum working for quality and safety.Methods Qualitative semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with 130 participants, including locums, patients, permanently employed doctors, nurses and other healthcare professionals with governance and recruitment responsibilities for locums across primary and secondary healthcare organisations in the English NHS. Data were collected between March 2021 and April 2022. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and abductive analysis.Results Participants described the implications of locum working for quality and safety across five themes: (1) 'familiarity' with an organisation and its patients and staff was essential to delivering safe care; (2) 'balance and stability' of services reliant on locums were seen as at risk of destabilisation and lacking leadership for quality improvement; (3) 'discrimination and exclusion' experienced by locums had negative implications for morale, retention and patient outcomes; (4) 'defensive practice' by locums as a result of perceptions of increased vulnerability and decreased support; (5) clinical governance arrangements, which often did not adequately cover locum doctors.Conclusion Locum working and how locums were integrated into organisations posed some significant challenges and opportunities for patient safety and quality of care. Organisations should take stock of how they work with the locum workforce to improve not only quality and safety but also locum experience and retention.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 362
页数:9
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2023, NHS Long Term Workforce Plan: Train-Growing the workforce
[2]   What is the role of individual accountability in patient safety? A multi-site ethnographic study [J].
Aveling, Emma-Louise ;
Parker, Michael ;
Dixon-Woods, Mary .
SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2016, 38 (02) :216-232
[3]  
Bate P., 2011, PERSPECTIVES CONTEXT
[4]   How defensive medicine is defined in European medical literature: a systematic review [J].
Baungaard, Nathalie ;
Skovvang, Pia Ladeby ;
Assing Hvidt, Elisabeth ;
Gerbild, Helle ;
Kirstine Andersen, Merethe ;
Lykkegaard, Jesper .
BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (01)
[5]   Association Between Treatment by Locum Tenens Internal Medicine Physicians and 30-Day Mortality Among Hospitalized Medicare Beneficiaries [J].
Blumenthal, Daniel M. ;
Olenski, Andrew R. ;
Tsugawa, Yusuke ;
Jena, Anupam B. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (21) :2119-2129
[6]   Role of locum GPs in antibiotic prescribing and stewardship: a mixed-methods study [J].
Borek, Aleksandra J. ;
Pouwels, Koen B. ;
van Hecke, Oliver ;
Robotham, Julie V. ;
Butler, Christopher C. ;
Tonkin-Crine, Sarah .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2022, 72 (715) :E118-E127
[7]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
[8]   One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? [J].
Braun, Virginia ;
Clarke, Victoria .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) :328-352
[9]   Sharing space at the research table: exploring public and patient involvement in a methodology priority setting partnership [J].
Burke N.N. ;
Stewart D. ;
Tierney T. ;
Worrall A. ;
Smith M. ;
Elliott J. ;
Beecher C. ;
Devane D. ;
Biesty L. .
Research Involvement and Engagement, 9 (1)
[10]   Critical Role of the Surgeon-Anesthesiologist Relationship for Patient Safety [J].
Cooper, Jeffrey B. .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2018, 129 (03) :402-405