A Teleological Approach to Information Systems Design

被引:1
作者
Fumagalli, Mattia [1 ]
Ferrario, Roberta [2 ]
Guizzardi, Giancarlo [3 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Bozen Bolzan, Bolzano, Italy
[2] CNR, Lab Appl Ontol, ISTC, Trento, Italy
[3] Semant Cybersecur & Serv SCS, Twente, Netherlands
关键词
Information systems design; Teleosemantics; Teleological explanation; Design; Explanation; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11023-024-09673-1
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In recent years, the design and production of information systems have seen significant growth. However, these information artefacts often exhibit characteristics that compromise their reliability. This issue appears to stem from the neglect or underestimation of certain crucial aspects in the application of Information Systems Design (ISD). For example, it is frequently difficult to prove when one of these products does not work properly or works incorrectly (falsifiability), their usage is often left to subjective experience and somewhat arbitrary choices (anecdotes), and their functions are often obscure for users as well as designers (explainability). In this paper, we propose an approach that can be used to support the analysis and re-(design) of information systems grounded on a well-known theory of information, namely, teleosemantics. This approach emphasizes the importance of grounding the design and validation process on dependencies between four core components: the producer (or designer), the produced (or used) information system, the consumer (or user), and the design (or use) purpose. We analyze the ambiguities and problems of considering these components separately. We then present some possible ways in which they can be combined through the teleological approach. Also, we debate guidelines to prevent ISD from failing to address critical issues. Finally, we discuss perspectives on applications over real existing information technologies and some implications for explainable AI and ISD.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
    Adadi, Amina
    Berrada, Mohammed
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 52138 - 52160
  • [2] A Research Agenda for Hybrid Intelligence: Augmenting Human Intellect With Collaborative, Adaptive, Responsible, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence
    Akata, Zeynep
    Balliet, Dan
    de Rijke, Maarten
    Dignum, Frank
    Dignum, Virginia
    Eiben, Guszti
    Fokkens, Antske
    Grossi, Davide
    Hindriks, Koen
    Hoos, Holger
    Hung, Hayley
    Jonker, Catholijn
    Monz, Christof
    Neerincx, Mark
    Oliehoek, Frans
    Prakken, Henry
    Schlobach, Stefan
    van der Gaag, Linda
    van Harmelen, Frank
    van Hoof, Herke
    van Riemsdijk, Birna
    van Wynsberghe, Aimee
    Verbrugge, Rineke
    Verheij, Bart
    Vossen, Piek
    Welling, Max
    [J]. COMPUTER, 2020, 53 (08) : 18 - 28
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2019, The Sciences of the Artificial
  • [5] Goal-based requirements analysis
    Anton, AI
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING, 1996, : 136 - 144
  • [6] A Dual-Aspect Theory of Artifact Function
    Artiga, Marc
    [J]. ERKENNTNIS, 2023, 88 (04) : 1533 - 1554
  • [7] Artiga M, 2016, ACTA BIOTHEOR, V64, P105, DOI 10.1007/s10441-015-9256-x
  • [8] Baader F, 2003, DESCRIPTION LOGIC HANDBOOK: THEORY, IMPLEMENTATION AND APPLICATIONS, P43
  • [9] Design Science Research Contributions: Finding a Balance between Artifact and Theory
    Baskerville, Richard
    Baiyere, Abayomi
    Gregor, Shirley
    Hevner, Alan
    Rossi, Matti
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 19 (05): : 358 - 376
  • [10] WHERES THE GOOD IN TELEOLOGY
    BEDAU, M
    [J]. PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1992, 52 (04) : 781 - 806