Reproductive outcomes in women with advanced endometriosis in fresh versus frozen embryo transfer cycles

被引:0
作者
Shoukry, Ahmed [1 ]
Gazeirly, Wael Samir El [1 ]
Khattab, Mohamed Abdelkader [2 ]
Abdelmoneim, Hesham Mahmoud Adel [1 ]
机构
[1] Alexandria Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Obstet & Gynecol, Alexandria, Egypt
[2] Alexandria Univ Hosp, Obstet & Gynecol, Alexandria, Egypt
关键词
Endometriosis; Freeze all; Frozen embryo transfer; Ongoing pregnancy rate; OVARIAN STIMULATION; LIVE BIRTH; IMPLANTATION; RECEPTIVITY; GONADOTROPIN; INFERTILITY; MATURATION; FERTILITY;
D O I
10.1186/s43043-024-00200-x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background ART in women with endometriosis is associated with poor quality of the retrieved oocytes and lower fertilization and pregnancy rates, reflecting that endometriosis may influence fertility by altering the quality of both the oocyte and embryo quality and also by impairing the endometrial receptivity. On comparing endometriosis-affected patients to healthy counterparts, many differences were demonstrated at the endometrial level. Thus, choosing the appropriate method of embryo transfer is of utmost importance, particularly for patients with advanced endometriosis. Objective The aim of the present study was to compare the reproductive outcomes between fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles in women with advanced endometriosis. Material and methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the period from January 2018 until December 2021 for patients recruited from two IVF centers, Alexandria, Egypt. Careful review of paper and electronic medical records of infertile women (primary, relative, or secondary infertility) aged 18-37 years who were diagnosed with advanced endometriosis by means of laparoscopy and were scheduled for ICSI followed by either fresh embryo transfer (group I) or freeze-all embryos and deferred embryo transfer (group II) of day 5 embryo(s) was included in the study. Results Two-hundred and eleven women were eligible and included in the study. Women in each study group were matched regarding baseline characteristics. Clinical pregnancy, implantation, and ongoing pregnancy rates were statistically significantly higher in the group of frozen embryo transfer (p < 0.001). Miscarriage rate was found to be higher in the group of fresh transfer compared to FET group but without a statistical significance (20.9% vs 9.2%, p = 0.072). Conclusion In women with advanced endometriosis, freeze-all policy seems to be associated with better implantation, ongoing pregnancy rates.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Disparities in reproductive outcomes according to the endometrial preparation protocol in frozen embryo transferThe risk of early pregnancy loss in frozen embryo transfer cycles
    I. Hatoum
    L. Bellon
    N. Swierkowski
    M. Ouazana
    S. Bouba
    K. Fathallah
    B. Paillusson
    M. Bailly
    F. Boitrelle
    L. Alter
    M. Bergère
    J. Selva
    R. Wainer
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2018, 35 : 425 - 429
  • [42] Pregnancy outcomes after fresh versus vitrified-warmed embryo transfer in women with adenomyosis: a retrospective cohort study
    Zhu, Xingwang
    Dongye, Houjin
    Lu, Shaomin
    Zhao, Xingbo
    Yan, Lei
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2022, 44 (06) : 1023 - 1029
  • [43] The time interval between oocyte retrieval and frozen embryo transfer does not impact reproductive outcomes
    Huang, Ying
    Gao, Jiangman
    Wang, Yuanyuan
    Zhang, Hua
    Chen, Lixue
    Yang, Yan
    Li, Rong
    Wang, Ying
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2023, 47 (02)
  • [44] Does embryo biopsy, independent of vitrification, impact perinatal outcomes? An analysis of perinatal outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing biopsy in fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles
    Van Heertum, Kristin
    DeVilbiss, Elizabeth A.
    Goldfarb, James
    Mumford, Sunni L.
    Weinerman, Rachel
    F&S REPORTS, 2024, 5 (01): : 47 - 54
  • [45] Frozen embryo transfer or fresh embryo transfer: Clinical outcomes depend on the number of oocytes retrieved
    Xu, Bing
    He, Ya-qiong
    Wang, Yuan
    Lu, Yao
    Hong, Yan
    Wang, Yao
    Sun, Yun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 215 : 50 - 54
  • [46] Transfer of Fresh versus Frozen Embryos in Ovulatory Women
    Shi, Yuhua
    Sun, Yun
    Hao, Cuifang
    Zhang, Heping
    Wei, Daimin
    Zhang, Yunshan
    Zhu, Yimin
    Deng, Xiaohui
    Qi, Xiujuan
    Li, Hong
    Ma, Xiang
    Ren, Haiqin
    Wang, Yaqin
    Zhang, Dan
    Wang, Bo
    Liu, Fenghua
    Wu, Qiongfang
    Wang, Ze
    Bai, Haiyan
    Li, Yuan
    Zhou, Yi
    Sun, Mei
    Liu, Hong
    Li, Jing
    Zhang, Lin
    Chen, Xiaoli
    Zhang, Songying
    Sun, Xiaoxi
    Legro, Richard S.
    Chen, Zi-Jiang
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 378 (02) : 126 - 136
  • [47] Impact of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer cycles in young women: a stage-dependent interference
    Coccia, Maria Elisabetta
    Rizzello, Francesca
    Mariani, Giulia
    Bulletti, Carlo
    Palagiano, Antonio
    Scarselli, Gianfranco
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2011, 90 (11) : 1232 - 1238
  • [48] The Impact of Endometriosis on Reproductive Outcomes in ART Cycles
    Ebrahimpoor, Motahare
    Firouzabadi, Razieh Dehghani
    Javaheri, Atiyeh
    Shamsi, Farimah
    Dashti, Saeideh
    ADVANCED BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 13 (01):
  • [49] Disparities in reproductive outcomes according to the endometrial preparation protocol in frozen embryo transfer
    Hatoum, I.
    Bellon, L.
    Swierkowski, N.
    Ouazana, M.
    Bouba, S.
    Fathallah, K.
    Paillusson, B.
    Bailly, M.
    Boitrelle, F.
    Alter, L.
    Bergere, M.
    Selva, J.
    Wainer, R.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2018, 35 (03) : 425 - 429
  • [50] Serum progesterone concentration on the day of embryo transfer in stimulated cycles does not correlate with reproductive outcomes
    Rozen, Genia
    Rogers, Peter
    Mizrachi, Yossi
    Teh, Wan Tinn
    Parmar, Chandrika
    Polyakov, Alex
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2022, 45 (06) : 1160 - 1166