Optimal timing of re-planning for head and neck adaptive radiotherapy

被引:6
|
作者
Gan, Yong [1 ,2 ]
Langendijk, Johannes A. [1 ]
Oldehinkel, Edwin [1 ]
Lin, Zhixiong [2 ]
Both, Stefan [1 ]
Brouwer, Charlotte L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Shantou Univ, Canc Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Med Coll, Shantou, Peoples R China
关键词
Head and neck cancer; Adaptive radiotherapy; Organs at risk; Dosimetric changes; Re-planning; RADIATION-THERAPY; DOSIMETRIC CHANGES; DOSE ACCUMULATION; PAROTID-GLANDS; CANCER; RISK; SELECTION; MARGINS; ORGANS; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110145
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) relies on re-planning to correct treatment variations, but the optimal timing of re-planning to account for dose changes in head and neck organs at risk (OARs) is still under investigation. We aimed to find out the optimal timing of re-planning in head and neck ART. Materials and methods: A total of 110 head and neck cancer patients were retrospectively enrolled. A semi auto-segmentation method was applied to obtain the weekly mean dose (D-mean) to OARs. The K-nearest-neighbour method was used for missing data imputation of weekly D-mean. A dose deviation map was built using the planning D-mean and weekly D-mean values and then used to simulate different ART scenarios consisting of 1 to 6 re-plannings. The difference between accumulated D-mean and planning D-mean before re-planning (Delta D-mean_acc_noART) and after re-planning (Delta D-mean_acc_ART) were evaluated and compared. Results: Among all the OARs, supraglottic showed the largest Delta D-mean_acc_noART (1.23 +/- 3.13 Gy) and most cases of Delta D-mean_acc_noART > 3 Gy (26 patients). The 3rd week is suggested in the optimal timing of re-planning for 10 OARs. For all the organs except arytenoid, 2 re-plannings were able to guarantee the Delta D-mean_acc_ART below 3 Gy while the average |Delta D-mean_acc_ART| was below 1 Gy. ART scenarios of 2_4, 3_4, 3_5 (week of re-planning separated with "_") were able to guarantee Delta D-mean_acc_ART of 99 % of patients below 3 Gy simultaneously for 19 OARs. Conclusions: The optimal timing of re-planning was suggested for different organs at risk in head and neck adaptive radiotherapy. Generic scenarios of timing and frequency for re-planning can be applied to guarantee the increase of accumulated mean dose within 3 Gy simultaneously for multiple organs.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A model to guide the management and decision of re-planning during radiotherapy for cervical cancer
    Zhang, Wei
    Li, Xiuhua
    Lin, Tingting
    Ma, Fang
    Ma, Xiaoyu
    Wu, Xiaoli
    Sun, Yingming
    Sun, Xiaoge
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 10 (12) : 5352 - 5363
  • [42] Suitability of propagated contours for adaptive replanning for head and neck radiotherapy
    Nash, David
    Palmer, Antony L.
    van Herk, Marcel
    McWilliam, Alan
    Osorio, Eliana Vasquez
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 102 : 66 - 72
  • [43] FMISO-Based Adaptive Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer
    Dolezel, Martin
    Slavik, Marek
    Blazek, Tomas
    Kazda, Tomas
    Koranda, Pavel
    Veverkova, Lucia
    Burkon, Petr
    Cvek, Jakub
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (08):
  • [44] In Silico Analysis of Adjuvant Head and Neck Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy
    All, Sean
    Zhong, Xinran
    Choi, Byongsu
    Kim, Jin Sung
    Zhuang, Tingliang
    Avkshtol, Vladimir
    Sher, David
    Lin, Mu -Han
    Moon, Dominic H.
    ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 9 (01)
  • [45] Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer reduces the requirement for rescans during treatment due to spinal cord dose
    Belshaw, Louise
    Agnew, Christina E.
    Irvine, Denise M.
    Rooney, Keith P.
    McGarry, Conor K.
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (01)
  • [46] Adaptive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Implications for Clinical and Dosimetry Outcomes
    Surucu, Murat
    Shah, Karan K.
    Roeske, John C.
    Choi, Mehee
    Small, William, Jr.
    Emami, Bahman
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2017, 16 (02) : 218 - 223
  • [47] PET/CT in radiotherapy planning in head and neck cancers
    Vicente, A. M. Garcia
    Castrejon, A. Soriano
    Londono, G. Andres Jimenez
    MEDECINE NUCLEAIRE-IMAGERIE FONCTIONNELLE ET METABOLIQUE, 2015, 39 (05): : 465 - 470
  • [48] Adaptive intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head-and-neck cancer: A volumetric and dosimetric study
    Burela, Nagarjuna
    Soni, Tej Prakash
    Patni, Nidhi
    Natarajan, Thiru
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 15 (03) : 533 - 538
  • [49] Treatment plan quality during online adaptive re-planning
    van Timmeren, Janita E.
    Chamberlain, Madalyne
    Krayenbuehl, Jerome
    Wilke, Lotte
    Ehrbar, Stefanie
    Bogowicz, Marta
    Hartley, Callum
    Zamburlini, Mariangela
    Andratschke, Nicolaus
    Garcia Schueler, Helena
    Pavic, Matea
    Balermpas, Panagiotis
    Ryu, Chaehee
    Guckenberger, Matthias
    Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [50] Adaptive Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer
    Castadot, Pierre
    Lee, John A.
    Geets, Xavier
    Gregoire, Vincent
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2010, 20 (02) : 84 - 93