Optimal timing of re-planning for head and neck adaptive radiotherapy

被引:6
|
作者
Gan, Yong [1 ,2 ]
Langendijk, Johannes A. [1 ]
Oldehinkel, Edwin [1 ]
Lin, Zhixiong [2 ]
Both, Stefan [1 ]
Brouwer, Charlotte L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Shantou Univ, Canc Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Med Coll, Shantou, Peoples R China
关键词
Head and neck cancer; Adaptive radiotherapy; Organs at risk; Dosimetric changes; Re-planning; RADIATION-THERAPY; DOSIMETRIC CHANGES; DOSE ACCUMULATION; PAROTID-GLANDS; CANCER; RISK; SELECTION; MARGINS; ORGANS; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110145
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) relies on re-planning to correct treatment variations, but the optimal timing of re-planning to account for dose changes in head and neck organs at risk (OARs) is still under investigation. We aimed to find out the optimal timing of re-planning in head and neck ART. Materials and methods: A total of 110 head and neck cancer patients were retrospectively enrolled. A semi auto-segmentation method was applied to obtain the weekly mean dose (D-mean) to OARs. The K-nearest-neighbour method was used for missing data imputation of weekly D-mean. A dose deviation map was built using the planning D-mean and weekly D-mean values and then used to simulate different ART scenarios consisting of 1 to 6 re-plannings. The difference between accumulated D-mean and planning D-mean before re-planning (Delta D-mean_acc_noART) and after re-planning (Delta D-mean_acc_ART) were evaluated and compared. Results: Among all the OARs, supraglottic showed the largest Delta D-mean_acc_noART (1.23 +/- 3.13 Gy) and most cases of Delta D-mean_acc_noART > 3 Gy (26 patients). The 3rd week is suggested in the optimal timing of re-planning for 10 OARs. For all the organs except arytenoid, 2 re-plannings were able to guarantee the Delta D-mean_acc_ART below 3 Gy while the average |Delta D-mean_acc_ART| was below 1 Gy. ART scenarios of 2_4, 3_4, 3_5 (week of re-planning separated with "_") were able to guarantee Delta D-mean_acc_ART of 99 % of patients below 3 Gy simultaneously for 19 OARs. Conclusions: The optimal timing of re-planning was suggested for different organs at risk in head and neck adaptive radiotherapy. Generic scenarios of timing and frequency for re-planning can be applied to guarantee the increase of accumulated mean dose within 3 Gy simultaneously for multiple organs.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Predicting the need for adaptive radiotherapy in head and neck cancer
    Brown, Elizabeth
    Owen, Rebecca
    Harden, Fiona
    Mengersen, Kerrie
    Oestreich, Kimberley
    Houghton, Whitney
    Poulsen, Michael
    Harris, Selina
    Lin, Charles
    Porceddu, Sandro
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 116 (01) : 57 - 63
  • [32] The use of in-vivo dosimetry to identify head and neck cancer patients needing adaptive radiotherapy
    Fiagan, Yawo A. C.
    Bossuyt, Evy
    Nevens, Daan
    Machiels, Melanie
    Chiairi, Ibrahim
    Joye, Ines
    Meijnders, Paul
    Gevaert, Thierry
    Verellen, Dirk
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 184
  • [33] MR-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Prospective Evaluation of Migration and Anatomical Changes of the Major Salivary Glands
    Van Timmeren, Janita E.
    Chamberlain, Madalyne
    Bogowicz, Marta
    Ehrbar, Stefanie
    Dal Bello, Riccardo
    Garcia Schuler, Helena
    Krayenbuehl, Jerome
    Wilke, Lotte
    Andratschke, Nicolaus
    Guckenberger, Matthias
    Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
    Balermpas, Panagiotis
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (21)
  • [34] Adensity assignment method for dose monitoring in head-and-neck radiotherapy
    Barateau, A.
    Perichon, N.
    Castelli, J.
    Schick, U.
    Henry, O.
    Chajon, E.
    Simon, A.
    Lafond, C.
    De Crevoisier, R.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2019, 195 (02) : 175 - 185
  • [35] A hybrid approach for head and neck cancer using online image guidance and offline adaptive radiotherapy planning
    Srivastava, Roopam
    Sharma, P. K.
    Das, K. J. Maria
    Manjhi, Jayanand
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2019, 18 (03) : 271 - 275
  • [36] The impact of robustness of deformable image registration on contour propagation and dose accumulation for head and neck adaptive radiotherapy
    Zhang, Lian
    Wang, Zhi
    Shi, Chengyu
    Long, Tengfei
    Xu, X. George
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (04): : 185 - 194
  • [37] Retrospective Clinical Evaluation of a Decision-Support Software for Adaptive Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer Patients
    Gros, Sebastien A. A.
    Santhanam, Anand P.
    Block, Alec M.
    Emami, Bahman
    Lee, Brian H.
    Joyce, Cara
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [38] Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: Pitfalls and possibilities from the radiation oncologist's point of view
    Nuyts, Sandra
    Bollen, Heleen
    Eisbruch, Avrahram
    Strojan, Primoz
    Mendenhall, William M.
    Ng, Sweet Ping
    Ferlito, Alfio
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (08):
  • [39] MR-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for OAR Sparing in Head and Neck Cancers
    Mulder, Samuel L.
    Heukelom, Jolien
    McDonald, Brigid A.
    Van Dijk, Lisanne
    Wahid, Kareem A.
    Sanders, Keith
    Salzillo, Travis C.
    Hemmati, Mehdi
    Schaefer, Andrew
    Fuller, Clifton D.
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (08)
  • [40] Head and neck adaptive radiotherapy
    Graff, P.
    Huger, S.
    Kirby, N.
    Pouliot, J.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2013, 17 (5-6): : 513 - 522