Optimal timing of re-planning for head and neck adaptive radiotherapy

被引:6
|
作者
Gan, Yong [1 ,2 ]
Langendijk, Johannes A. [1 ]
Oldehinkel, Edwin [1 ]
Lin, Zhixiong [2 ]
Both, Stefan [1 ]
Brouwer, Charlotte L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Shantou Univ, Canc Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Med Coll, Shantou, Peoples R China
关键词
Head and neck cancer; Adaptive radiotherapy; Organs at risk; Dosimetric changes; Re-planning; RADIATION-THERAPY; DOSIMETRIC CHANGES; DOSE ACCUMULATION; PAROTID-GLANDS; CANCER; RISK; SELECTION; MARGINS; ORGANS; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110145
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) relies on re-planning to correct treatment variations, but the optimal timing of re-planning to account for dose changes in head and neck organs at risk (OARs) is still under investigation. We aimed to find out the optimal timing of re-planning in head and neck ART. Materials and methods: A total of 110 head and neck cancer patients were retrospectively enrolled. A semi auto-segmentation method was applied to obtain the weekly mean dose (D-mean) to OARs. The K-nearest-neighbour method was used for missing data imputation of weekly D-mean. A dose deviation map was built using the planning D-mean and weekly D-mean values and then used to simulate different ART scenarios consisting of 1 to 6 re-plannings. The difference between accumulated D-mean and planning D-mean before re-planning (Delta D-mean_acc_noART) and after re-planning (Delta D-mean_acc_ART) were evaluated and compared. Results: Among all the OARs, supraglottic showed the largest Delta D-mean_acc_noART (1.23 +/- 3.13 Gy) and most cases of Delta D-mean_acc_noART > 3 Gy (26 patients). The 3rd week is suggested in the optimal timing of re-planning for 10 OARs. For all the organs except arytenoid, 2 re-plannings were able to guarantee the Delta D-mean_acc_ART below 3 Gy while the average |Delta D-mean_acc_ART| was below 1 Gy. ART scenarios of 2_4, 3_4, 3_5 (week of re-planning separated with "_") were able to guarantee Delta D-mean_acc_ART of 99 % of patients below 3 Gy simultaneously for 19 OARs. Conclusions: The optimal timing of re-planning was suggested for different organs at risk in head and neck adaptive radiotherapy. Generic scenarios of timing and frequency for re-planning can be applied to guarantee the increase of accumulated mean dose within 3 Gy simultaneously for multiple organs.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Criteria for Verification and Replanning Based on the Adaptive Radiotherapy Protocol "Best for Adaptive Radiotherapy" in Head and Neck Cancer
    Bak, Bartosz
    Skrobala, Agnieszka
    Adamska, Anna
    Kazmierska, Joanna
    Jozefacka, Natalia
    Piotrowski, Tomasz
    Malicki, Julian
    LIFE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (05):
  • [22] Adaptive radiotherapy in head and neck cancer is required to avoid tumor underdose
    Castelli, J.
    Simon, A.
    Rigaud, B.
    Chajon, E.
    Thariat, J.
    Benezery, K.
    Vauleon, E.
    Jegoux, F.
    Henry, O.
    Lafond, C.
    de Crevoisier, R.
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2018, 57 (09) : 1267 - 1270
  • [23] The frequency of re-planning and its variability dependent on the modification of the re-planning criteria and IGRT correction strategy in head and neck IMRT
    Markus Stoll
    Kristina Giske
    Jürgen Debus
    Rolf Bendl
    Eva Maria Stoiber
    Radiation Oncology, 9
  • [24] Dosimetric benefit of adaptive re-planning in pancreatic cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy
    Li, Yongbao
    Hoisak, Jeremy D. P.
    Li, Nan
    Jiang, Carrie
    Tian, Zhen
    Gautier, Quentin
    Zarepisheh, Masoud
    Wu, Zhaoxia
    Liu, Yaqiang
    Jia, Xun
    Hattangadi-Gluth, Jona
    Mell, Loren K.
    Jiang, Steve
    Murphy, James D.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2015, 40 (04) : 318 - 324
  • [25] Head and neck adaptive radiotherapy: A tool for the detection of patients requiring adaptive radiotherapy
    Huger, S.
    Graff, P.
    Marchesi, V.
    Vogin, G.
    Guinement, L.
    Serre, A. A.
    Peiffert, D.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2015, 19 (6-7): : 463 - 470
  • [26] Dosimetrically triggered adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: Considerations for the implementation of clinical protocols
    Barragan-Montero, Ana M. M.
    Van Ooteghem, Genevieve
    Dumont, Damien
    Rivas, Sara Teruel
    Sterpin, Edmond
    Geets, Xavier
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (11):
  • [27] Practical and technical key challenges in head and neck adaptive radiotherapy: The GORTEC point of view
    Delaby, Nolwenn
    Barateau, Anais
    Chiavassa, Sophie
    Biston, Marie-Claude
    Chartier, Philippe
    Graulieres, Eliane
    Guinement, Lucie
    Huger, Sandrine
    Lacornerie, Thomas
    Millardet-Martin, Corinne
    Sottiaux, Alain
    Caron, Jerome
    Gensanne, David
    Pointreau, Yoann
    Coutte, Alexandre
    Biau, Julian
    Serre, Anne-Agathe
    Castelli, Joel
    Tomsej, Milan
    Garcia, Robin
    Khamphan, Catherine
    Badey, Aurelien
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 109
  • [28] Image-guided radiotherapy in head-and-neck oncology
    Balermpas, Panagiotis
    ONKOLOGIE, 2023, 29 (01): : 45 - 50
  • [29] Dosimetric Benefit of Adaptive Re-Planning in Lung Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT)
    Jia, J.
    Tian, Z.
    Gu, X.
    Yan, H.
    Jia, X.
    Jiang, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 167 - 167
  • [30] Adaptive radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: Evaluating volumetric and dosimetric changes for enhanced treatment quality
    Albosaabar, Muntather Habeeb
    Ahmad, Rozilawati Binti
    Abouelenein, Hassan
    Mohamed, Faizal
    Yahya, Noorazrul
    Mohamed, Dalia Osama
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 17 (02)