How values and perceptions shape farmers' biodiversity management: Insights from ten European countries

被引:9
作者
Klebl, Fabian [1 ,2 ]
Parisi, Anton [1 ]
Haefner, Kati [1 ]
Adler, Anneli [3 ]
Barreiro, Silvia [4 ]
Bodea, Flaviu Valentin [5 ]
Bronnimann, Viviane [6 ]
de Vries, Jan Peter Reinier [7 ]
Dos Santos, Alice [8 ,9 ]
Hood, Amelia S. C. [10 ]
Melts, Indrek [11 ]
Popa, Razvan [5 ]
Vajna, Flora [12 ]
Velado-Alonso, Elena [13 ]
Kernecker, Maria Lee [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Eberswalder Str 84, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Albrecht Daniel Thaer Inst Agr & Hort Sci, Agr & Food Policy Grp, Unter Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Crop Prod Ecol, POB 7043, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Univ Evora, MED Mediterranean Inst Agr Environm & Dev, Casa Cordovil 2 Andar, P-7000890 Evora, Portugal
[5] Univ Babes Bolyai, Fac Biol & Geol, Str Clinicilor 5-7, Cluj Napoca 400006, Romania
[6] Agroscope Swiss Fed Res Inst, Agr Landscape & Biodivers Sect, Reckenholzstr 191, CH-8046 Zurich, Switzerland
[7] Wageningen Univ, Plant Ecol & Nat Conservat Grp, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
[8] CNRS, Ctr Etud Biol Chize, UMR7372, F-79360 Villiers En Bois, France
[9] Univ La Rochelle, F-79360 Villiers En Bois, France
[10] Univ Reading, Sch Agr Policy & Dev, Ctr Agrienvironm Res, POB 237, Reading RG6 6AR, Berks, England
[11] Estonian Univ Life Sci, Inst Agr & Environm Sci, Kreutzwaldi 5, EE-51006 Tartu, Estonia
[12] Ctr Ecol Res, Inst Ecol & Bot, Lendulet Ecosyst Serv Res Grp, Alkotmany Ut 2-4, H-2163 Vacratot, Hungary
[13] CSIC, Estn Biol Donana, Ave Americo Vespucio 26, Seville 41092, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Biodiversity conservation; Environmental ethics; Utilitarianism; Deontology; Ecosystem services value; Sustainable agriculture; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; NATURES CONTRIBUTIONS; FRAMEWORK; DEONTOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110496
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Farmers play a pivotal role in addressing biodiversity loss whilst maintaining food production. To rethink conservation in agricultural landscapes, it is crucial to understand their decisions regarding biodiversity and its management on the farms. In this study, we conducted 48 semi-structured interviews across ten European countries in 2021/22 to explore how farmers' perceptions and valuations relate to their biodiversity management. Employing reflexive thematic analysis, we identified recurring patterns of shared meanings. Our findings underscore the profound influence of farmers' biodiversity perceptions on their biodiversity management practices: 1) Narrow and targeted interventions were closely tied to instrumental values of biodiversity, whereas holistic management strategies were linked with recognising an inherent value of nature. 2) Targeted approaches were related to farmers' interpretations of biodiversity as specific taxa and functions, relying on easily assessable and emotionally connoted indicators. 3) Holistic approaches aligned with a broader biodiversity concept and an emphasis on intricate functional relationships within ecosystems. 4) Actual decisions to implement measures were significantly constrained by perceived dependencies, namely production pathways, social dependencies, and landscape conditions. These findings raise a critical question about the prioritisation of ecocentric intrinsic versus anthropocentric instrumental values in conservation strategies. We propose an approach of ethical pluralism, acknowledging that instrumental values may provide practical solutions for certain challenges, while intrinsic values hold ethical significance, particularly in the context of complex or large-scale biodiversity conservation initiatives. Engaging in dialogue that accounts for diverse values will be essential for shaping effective and socially meaningful biodiversity conservation.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Agricultural heritage systems and agrobiodiversity [J].
Agnoletti, Mauro ;
Santoro, Antonio .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2022, 31 (10) :2231-2241
[2]  
Alexander L., 2021, Deontological ethics
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Methodological assessment of the diverse values and valuation of nature of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, DOI [DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.6522522, 10.5281/zenodo.6522522]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Qual Res Psychol, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity
[6]   Developments in Swedish forest policy and administration - from a "policy of restriction" toward a "policy of cooperation" [J].
Appelstrand, Marie .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2012, 27 (02) :186-199
[7]   The role of power in leveraging the diverse values of nature for transformative change [J].
Arias-Arevalo, Paola ;
Lazos-Chavero, Elena ;
Monroy-Sais, Ana S. ;
Nelson, Sara H. ;
Pawlowska-Mainville, Agnieszka ;
Vatn, Arild ;
Cantu-Fernandez, Mariana ;
Murali, Ranjini ;
Muraca, Barbara ;
Pascual, Unai .
CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 64
[8]   Exploring intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values for sustainable management of social-ecological systems [J].
Arias-Arevalo, Paola ;
Martin-Lopez, Berta ;
Gomez-Baggethun, Erik .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2017, 22 (04)
[9]  
Balvanera P., 2022, Methodological Assessment Report on the Diverse Values and Valuation of Nature of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.6418971, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.6418971]
[10]  
Bartkowski B., 2017, Economic valuation of biodiversity