A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy based on open state with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer

被引:0
作者
Zhao, Xin [1 ]
Liu, Yansong [1 ]
Niu, Jumin [1 ]
Shi, Yulin [1 ]
机构
[1] Shenyang Womens & Childrens Hosp, Shenyang, Liaoning, Peoples R China
关键词
Cervical cancer; Laparoscopic surgery; Radical hysterectomy; Phase III clinical trial; Based on open state; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MULTICENTER; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-024-08318-z
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundCervical cancer is the fourth most frequently diagnosed cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer death in women, The standard treatment recommendation for women with early cervical cancer is radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection, however, articles published in recent years have concluded that the treatment outcome of laparoscopic surgery for cervical cancer is inferior to that of open surgery. Thus, we choose a surgically new approach; the laparoscopic cervical cancer surgery in the open state is compared with the traditional open cervical cancer surgery, and we hope that patients can still have a good tumor outcome and survival outcome. This trial will investigate the effectiveness of laparoscopic cervical cancer surgery in the open-state treatment of early-stage cervical cancer.Method and designThis will be an open-label, 2-armed, randomized, phase-III single-center trial of comparing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy based on open state with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. A total of 740 participants will be randomly assigned into 2 treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio. Clinical, laboratory, ultrasound, and radiology data will be collected at baseline, and then at the study assessments and procedures performed at baseline and 1 week, 6 weeks, and 3 months, and follow-up visits begin at 3 months following surgery and continue every 3 months thereafter for the first 2 years and every 6 months until year 4.5. The primary aim is the rate of disease-free survival at 4.5 years. The secondary aims include treatment-related morbidity, costs and cost-effectiveness, patterns of recurrence, quality of life, pelvic floor function, and overall survival.ConclusionsThis prospective trial aims to show the equivalence of the laparoscopic cervical cancer surgery in the open state versus the transabdominal radical hysterectomy approach for patients with early-stage cervical cancer following a 2-phase protocol.Trial registrationChiCTR2300075118. Registered on August 25, 2023.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Radical abdominal hysterectomy
    Abu-Rustum, NR
    Hoskins, WJ
    [J]. SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 81 (04) : 815 - +
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2020, CA Cancer J Clin, V70, P313, DOI [10.3322/caac.21492, 10.3322/caac.21609]
  • [3] Prognostic and Safety Roles in Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysis
    Cao, Tiefeng
    Feng, Yanling
    Huang, Qidan
    Wan, Ting
    Liu, Jihong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 25 (12): : 990 - 998
  • [4] SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
    Chan, An-Wen
    Tetzlaff, Jennifer M.
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Mann, Howard
    Berlin, Jesse A.
    Dickersin, Kay
    Hrobjartsson, Asbjorn
    Schulz, Kenneth F.
    Parulekar, Wendy R.
    Krleza-Jeric, Karmela
    Laupacis, Andreas
    Moher, David
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 346
  • [5] Chen Chunlin., 2020, Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstetr, V36, P80
  • [6] SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer
    Chiva, Luis
    Zanagnolo, Vanna
    Querleu, Denis
    Martin-Calvo, Nerea
    Arevalo-Serrano, Juan
    Capilna, Mihai Emil
    Fagotti, Anna
    Kucukmetin, Ali
    Mom, Constantijne
    Chakalova, Galina
    Aliyev, Shamistan
    Malzoni, Mario
    Narducci, Fabrice
    Arencibia, Octavio
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    Toptas, Tayfun
    Cibula, David
    Kaidarova, Dilyara
    Meydanli, Mehmet Mutlu
    Tavares, Mariana
    Golub, Dmytro
    Perrone, Anna Myriam
    Poka, Robert
    Tsolakidis, Dimitrios
    Vujic, Goran
    Jedryka, Marcin A.
    Zusterzeel, Petra L. M.
    Beltman, Jogchum Jan
    Goffin, Frederic
    Haidopoulos, Dimitrios
    Haller, Herman
    Jach, Robert
    Yezhova, Iryna
    Berlev, Igor
    Bernardino, Margarida
    Bharathan, Rasiah
    Lanner, Maximilian
    Maenpaa, Minna M.
    Sukhin, Vladyslav
    Feron, Jean-Guillaume
    Fruscio, Robert
    Kukk, Kersti
    Ponce, Jordi
    Minguez, Jose Angel
    Vazquez-Vicente, Daniel
    Castellanos, Teresa
    Chacon, Enrique
    Alcazar, Juan Luis
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2020, 30 (09) : 1269 - 1277
  • [7] Introduction of gasless laparoscopic surgery as a minimally invasive procedure for endometrial cancer and its usefulness from the viewpoint of the learning curve
    Ito, Hiroe
    Moritake, Tetsuya
    Terauchi, Fumitoshi
    Isaka, Keiichi
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [8] Ito Hiroe, 2023, JSLS, V27, p2022.00083
  • [9] Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer
    Kanao, Hiroyuki
    Matsuo, Koji
    Aoki, Yoichi
    Tanigawa, Terumi
    Nomura, Hidetaka
    Okamoto, Sanshiro
    Takeshima, Nobuhiro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30 (03)
  • [10] Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial
    Kavallaris, Andreas
    Chalvatzas, Nektarios
    Gkoutzioulis, Antonios
    Zygouris, Dimitrios
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2021, 303 (04) : 1039 - 1047