Is Direct Decompression Necessary for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF)? A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Direct and Indirect Decompression With LLIF in Selected Patients

被引:3
作者
Limthongkul, Worawat [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Thanapura, Chayapong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jitpakdee, Khanathip [4 ]
Praisarnti, Pakawas [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kotheeranurak, Vit [4 ]
Yingsakmongkol, Wicharn [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tanasansomboon, Teerachat [3 ]
Singhatanadgige, Weerasak [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[2] King Chulalongkorn Mem Hosp, Thai Red Cross Soc, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[3] Chulalongkorn Univ, Ctr Excellence Biomech & Innovat Spine Surg, Bangkok, Thailand
[4] Thai Red Cross Soc, Queen Savang Vadhana Mem Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Sriracha, Chonburi, Thailand
关键词
Lateral lumbar interbody fusion; Oblique lumbar interbody fusion; Decom-; pression; Interbody fusion; SURGERY; PAIN; COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTORS; OUTCOMES; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.14245/ns.2346906.453
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes following lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) between direct and indirect decompression in the treatment of patients with degenerative lumbar diseases. Methods: Patients who underwent single-level LLIF were randomized into 2 groups: direct decompression (group D) and indirect decompression (group I). Clinical outcomes including the Oswestry Disability index and visual analogue scale of back and leg pain were collected. Radiographic outcomes including cross-sectional area (CSA) of thecal sac, disc height, foraminal height, foraminal area, fusion rate, segmental, and lumbar lordosis were measured. Results: Twenty-eight patients who met the inclusion criteria were eligible for the analysis, with a distribution of 14 subjects in each group. The average age was 66.1 years. Postoperatively, significant improvements were observed in all clinical parameters. However, these improvements did not show significant difference between both groups at all follow-up periods. All radiographic outcomes were not different between both groups, except for the increase in CSA which was significantly greater in group D (77.73 +/- 20.26 mm2 vs. 54.32 +/- 35.70 mm2, p = 0.042). Group I demonstrated significantly lower blood loss (68.13 +/- 32.06 mL vs. 210.00 +/- 110.05 mL, p < 0.005), as well as shorter operative time (136.35 +/- 28.07 minutes vs. 182.18 +/- 42.67 minutes, p = 0.002). Overall complication rate was not different. Conclusion: Indirect decompression through LLIF results in comparable clinical improvement to LLIF with additional direct decompression over 1-year follow-up period. These findings suggest that, for an appropriate candidate, direct decompression in LLIF might not be necessary since the ligamentotaxis effect achieved through indirect decompression appears sufficient to relieve symptoms while diminishing blood loss and operative time.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 351
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]   Indirect Decompression Effect to Central Canal and Ligamentum Flavum After Extreme Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion [J].
Limthongkul, Worawat ;
Tanasansomboon, Teerachat ;
Yingsakmongkol, Wicharn ;
Tanaviriyachai, Terdpong ;
Radcliff, Kris ;
Singhatanadgige, Weerasak .
SPINE, 2020, 45 (17) :E1077-E1084
[12]   Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Direct Versus Indirect Decompression with Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Matched-Pair Comparison Analysis [J].
Lin, Guang-Xun ;
Akbary, Kutbuddin ;
Kotheeranurak, Vit ;
Quilio-Olvera, Javier ;
Jo, Hyun-Jin ;
Yang, Xiao-Wei ;
Mahatthanatrakul, Akawom ;
Kim, Jin-Sung .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 119 :E898-E909
[13]  
Mobbs Ralph J, 2015, J Spine Surg, V1, P2, DOI 10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05
[14]   Usefulness of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 Level Compared to Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion [J].
Mun, Hah Yong ;
Ko, Myeong Jin ;
Kim, Young Baeg ;
Park, Seung Won .
JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 63 (06) :723-729
[15]   Predictors of the need for laminectomy after indirect decompression via initial anterior or lateral lumbar interbody fusion [J].
Park, Daehyun ;
Mummaneni, Praveen, V ;
Mehra, Ratnesh ;
Kwon, Yonguk ;
Kim, Sungtae ;
Ruan, Hui Bing ;
Chou, Dean .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2020, 32 (06) :781-787
[16]   Indirect Decompression Using Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Revision Surgery Following Previous Posterior Decompression: Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Direct and Indirect Decompression Revision Surgery [J].
Park, Sang-Jin ;
Hwang, Jong-Moon ;
Cho, Dae-Chul ;
Lee, Subum ;
Kim, Chi Heon ;
Han, Inbo ;
Park, Dae-Won ;
Kwon, Heum-Dai ;
Kim, Kyoung-Tae .
NEUROSPINE, 2022, 19 (03) :544-554
[17]   Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF): An Update [J].
Rabau, Oded ;
Navarro-Ramirez, Rodrigo ;
Aziz, Mina ;
Teles, Alisson ;
Mengxiao Ge, Susan ;
Quillo-Olvera, Javier ;
Ouellet, Jean .
GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 10 :17S-21S
[18]  
Sanjaroensuttikul Nopawan, 2007, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, V90, P1417
[19]   Radiographic evaluation of indirect decompression of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerated lumbar spondylolisthesis [J].
Sato, Jun ;
Ohtori, Seiji ;
Orita, Sumihisa ;
Yamauchi, Kazuyo ;
Eguchi, Yawara ;
Ochiai, Nobuyasu ;
Kuniyoshi, Kazuki ;
Aoki, Yasuchika ;
Nakamura, Junichi ;
Miyagi, Masayuki ;
Suzuki, Miyako ;
Kubota, Gou ;
Inage, Kazuhide ;
Sainoh, Takeshi ;
Fujimoto, Kazuki ;
Shiga, Yasuhiro ;
Abe, Koki ;
Kanamoto, Hiroto ;
Inoue, Gen ;
Takahashi, Kazuhisa .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 (03) :671-678
[20]   Indirect decompression with lateral interbody fusion for severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: minimum 1-year MRI follow-up [J].
Shimizu, Takayoshi ;
Fujibayashi, Shunsuke ;
Otsuki, Bungo ;
Murata, Koichi ;
Matsuda, Shuichi .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2020, 33 (01) :27-34