Predicting 3D and 2D surface area of corals from simple field measurements

被引:1
|
作者
Chandler, Josie F. [1 ]
Figueira, Will F. [2 ]
Burn, Deborah [1 ]
Doll, Peter C. [1 ]
Johandes, Abby [1 ]
Piccaluga, Agustina [2 ]
Pratchett, Morgan S. [1 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ, Coll Sci & Engn, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Life & Environm Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
HABITAT COMPLEXITY; REEF; GROWTH; QUANTIFICATION; FISHERIES; ACCURACY; RATES;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-71580-3
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The structural architecture of coral reefs is a known predictor of species richness, fish biomass and reef resilience. At a smaller scale, three-dimensional (3D) surface area of corals is a fundamental determinant of physical and biological processes. Quantifying the 3D surface area of corals has applications for a broad range of scientific disciplines, including carbonate production estimates, coral predation studies, and assessments of reef growth. Here, we present morphotaxon-specific conversion metrics to estimate total 3D surface area and projected 2D surface area of individual colonies from simple field measurements of colony maximum diameter. Underwater photogrammetry techniques were used to quantify surface area and estimate conversion metrics. Bayesian models showed strong non-linear (power) relationships between colony maximum diameter and both total 3D surface area and projected 2D surface area for 13 out of 15 morphotaxa. This study presents a highly resolved and efficient method for obtaining critical surface area assessments of corals for various applications, including assessments of biotic surface area, tissue biomass, calcification rates, coral demographic rates, and reef restoration monitoring.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 2D or 3D?
    Mills, R
    COMPUTER-AIDED ENGINEERING, 1996, 15 (08): : 4 - 4
  • [22] Pixel Coordinates for Obtaining 3D Body Measurements from 2D Images
    Sengoz, Nefise Gonul
    Zeybek, Fatih
    TEKSTIL VE KONFEKSIYON, 2024, 34 (02): : 127 - 146
  • [23] Planar Surface SLAM with 3D and 2D Sensors
    Trevor, Alexander J. B.
    Rogers, John G., III
    Christensen, Henrik I.
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (ICRA), 2012, : 3041 - 3048
  • [24] COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D WELDING SIMULATIONS OF A SIMPLE PLATE
    Dewees, David J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, PVP 2012, VOL 2, 2012, : 273 - 281
  • [25] 3D images created on 2D nanostructured surface
    Pylant, Autum C.
    PHOTONICS SPECTRA, 2017, 51 (09) : 18 - 18
  • [27] SIMPLE AND EFFICIENT 2D AND 3D SPAN CLIPPING ALGORITHMS
    DUVANENKO, VJ
    GYURCSIK, RS
    ROBBINS, WE
    COMPUTERS & GRAPHICS, 1993, 17 (01) : 39 - 54
  • [28] Simple Estimation of the Surface Area of Irregular 3D Particles
    Erdogan, S. T.
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2016, 28 (08)
  • [29] Surveillance of a 2D Plane Area with 3D Deployed Cameras
    Fu, Yi-Ge
    Zhou, Jie
    Deng, Lei
    SENSORS, 2014, 14 (02) : 1988 - 2011
  • [30] Estimation of a surface current distribution from 2D magnetic field measurements
    Nguyen, T. A.
    Joubert, P-Y.
    Lefebvre, S.
    Chaplier, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED ELECTROMAGNETICS AND MECHANICS, 2012, 39 (1-4) : 151 - 156