Radiomics Machine Learning Analysis of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma for Tumour Grade Prediction Based on Intra-Tumoural Sub-Region Heterogeneity

被引:10
作者
Alhussaini, Abeer J. [1 ,2 ]
Steele, J. Douglas [1 ]
Jawli, Adel [1 ,3 ]
Nabi, Ghulam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Ninewells Hosp, Sch Med, Div Imaging Sci & Technol, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
[2] Al Amiri Hosp, Dept Clin Radiol, Minist Hlth, Sulibikhat 1300, Kuwait
[3] Sheikh Jaber Al Ahmad Al Sabah Hosp, Dept Clin Radiol, Minist Hlth, Sulibikhat 1300, Kuwait
关键词
clear cell renal cell carcinoma; renal masses; biopsy; computed tomography; radiomics; machine learning; tumour sub-regions; tumour heterogeneity; precision medicine; NEEDLE PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY; SYSTEM; ACCURACY; MASSES; CLASSIFICATION; INFORMATION; VALIDATION; PARAMETERS; SOCIETY; IMAGES;
D O I
10.3390/cancers16081454
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) accounts for at least 80% of renal tumours worldwide. The grading of clear cell carcinoma is crucial for its management; therefore, it is important to distinguish the ccRCC grade pre-operatively. The aim of this research is to differentiate high- from low-grade ccRCC non-invasively using machine learning (ML) and radiomics features extracted from pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scans, taking into consideration the tumour sub-region that offers the greatest accuracy when grading. Furthermore, radiomics and machine learning were compared with biopsy-determined grading in a sub-group with resection histopathology as a reference standard.Abstract Background: Renal cancers are among the top ten causes of cancer-specific mortality, of which the ccRCC subtype is responsible for most cases. The grading of ccRCC is important in determining tumour aggressiveness and clinical management. Objectives: The objectives of this research were to predict the WHO/ISUP grade of ccRCC pre-operatively and characterise the heterogeneity of tumour sub-regions using radiomics and ML models, including comparison with pre-operative biopsy-determined grading in a sub-group. Methods: Data were obtained from multiple institutions across two countries, including 391 patients with pathologically proven ccRCC. For analysis, the data were separated into four cohorts. Cohorts 1 and 2 included data from the respective institutions from the two countries, cohort 3 was the combined data from both cohort 1 and 2, and cohort 4 was a subset of cohort 1, for which both the biopsy and subsequent histology from resection (partial or total nephrectomy) were available. 3D image segmentation was carried out to derive a voxel of interest (VOI) mask. Radiomics features were then extracted from the contrast-enhanced images, and the data were normalised. The Pearson correlation coefficient and the XGBoost model were used to reduce the dimensionality of the features. Thereafter, 11 ML algorithms were implemented for the purpose of predicting the ccRCC grade and characterising the heterogeneity of sub-regions in the tumours. Results: For cohort 1, the 50% tumour core and 25% tumour periphery exhibited the best performance, with an average AUC of 77.9% and 78.6%, respectively. The 50% tumour core presented the highest performance in cohorts 2 and 3, with average AUC values of 87.6% and 76.9%, respectively. With the 25% periphery, cohort 4 showed AUC values of 95.0% and 80.0% for grade prediction when using internal and external validation, respectively, while biopsy histology had an AUC of 31.0% for the classification with the final grade of resection histology as a reference standard. The CatBoost classifier was the best for each of the four cohorts with an average AUC of 80.0%, 86.5%, 77.0% and 90.3% for cohorts 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. Conclusions: Radiomics signatures combined with ML have the potential to predict the WHO/ISUP grade of ccRCC with superior performance, when compared to pre-operative biopsy. Moreover, tumour sub-regions contain useful information that should be analysed independently when determining the tumour grade. Therefore, it is possible to distinguish the grade of ccRCC pre-operatively to improve patient care and management.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Agner S., 2010, P INT SOC MAGNETIC R, VVolume 2490
[2]   Comparative Analysis for the Distinction of Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma from Renal Oncocytoma in Computed Tomography Imaging Using Machine Learning Radiomics Analysis [J].
Alhussaini, Abeer J. ;
Steele, J. Douglas ;
Nabi, Ghulam .
CANCERS, 2022, 14 (15)
[3]   A Comprehensive Evaluation and Benchmarking of Convolutional Neural Networks for Melanoma Diagnosis [J].
Alzahrani, Saeed ;
Al-Bander, Baidaa ;
Al-Nuaimy, Waleed .
CANCERS, 2021, 13 (17)
[4]   Tumor Seeding With Renal Cell Carcinoma After Renal Biopsy [J].
Andersen, M. F. B. ;
Norus, T. P. .
UROLOGY CASE REPORTS, 2016, 9 :43-44
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Journal Information Engineering Applications
[6]   Machine learning applications on intratumoral heterogeneity in glioblastoma using single -cell RNA sequencing data [J].
Arteaga-Arteaga, Harold Brayan ;
Candamil-Cortes, Mariana S. ;
Breaux, Brian ;
Guillen-Rondon, Pablo ;
Orozco-Arias, Simon ;
Tabares-Soto, Reinel .
BRIEFINGS IN FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS, 2023, 22 (05) :428-441
[7]   Percutaneous Biopsy of Renal Cell Carcinoma Underestimates Nuclear Grade [J].
Blumenfeld, Aaron J. ;
Guru, Khurshid ;
Fuchs, Gerhard J. ;
Kim, Hyung L. .
UROLOGY, 2010, 76 (03) :610-613
[8]   Classifiers and their Metrics Quantified [J].
Brown, J. B. .
MOLECULAR INFORMATICS, 2018, 37 (1-2)
[9]  
Brownlee J., How to Avoid Data Leakage When Performing Data Preparation
[10]   Deep Learning: A Primer for Radiologists [J].
Chartrand, Gabriel ;
Cheng, Phillip M. ;
Vorontsov, Eugene ;
Drozdzal, Michal ;
Turcotte, Simon ;
Pal, Christopher J. ;
Kadoury, Samuel ;
Tang, An .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2017, 37 (07) :2113-2131