Predictive value of number of metastatic lymph nodes and lymph node ratio for prognosis of patients with FIGO 2018 stage IIICp cervical cancer: a multi-center retrospective study

被引:4
作者
Ye, Yanna [1 ,2 ]
Lian, Rui [3 ]
Li, Zhiqiang [2 ]
Chen, Xiaolin [2 ]
Huang, Yahong [2 ]
Yao, Jilong [4 ]
Lu, Anwei [5 ]
Lang, Jinghe [2 ,6 ]
Liu, Ping [2 ]
Chen, Chunlin [2 ]
机构
[1] Dongguan Polytech, Dept Midwifery, Sch Hlth, Dongguan 523808, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Guangzhou 510515, Peoples R China
[3] China Japan Friendship Hosp, Emergency Dept, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[4] Shenzhen Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Shenzhen 518028, Peoples R China
[5] Southern Med Univ, Shenzhen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Shenzhen 510086, Peoples R China
[6] Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
关键词
Cervical cancer; FIGO; 2018; IIIC; Number of metastatic lymph nodes; Lymph node ratio; Oncological outcome; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION; ABSOLUTE NUMBER; SURVIVAL; IB; ADENOCARCINOMA; IMPACT; IIA; STRATIFICATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-024-12784-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background To identify the cut-off values for the number of metastatic lymph nodes (nMLN) and lymph node ratio (LNR) that can predict outcomes in patients with FIGO 2018 IIICp cervical cancer (CC). Methods Patients with CC who underwent radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy were identified for a propensity score-matched (PSM) cohort study. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the critical nMLN and LNR values. Five-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. Results This study included 3,135 CC patients with stage FIGO 2018 IIICp from 47 Chinese hospitals between 2004 and 2018. Based on ROC curve analysis, the cut-off values for nMLN and LNR were 3.5 and 0.11, respectively. The final cohort consisted of nMLN <= 3 (n = 2,378) and nMLN > 3 (n = 757) groups and LNR <= 0.11 (n = 1,748) and LNR > 0.11 (n = 1,387) groups. Significant differences were found in survival between the nMLN <= 3 vs the nMLN > 3 (post-PSM, OS: 76.8% vs 67.9%, P = 0.003; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.411, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.108-1.798, P = 0.005; DFS: 65.5% vs 55.3%, P < 0.001; HR: 1.428, 95% CI: 1.175-1.735, P < 0.001), and the LNR <= 0.11 and LNR > 0.11 (post-PSM, OS: 82.5% vs 76.9%, P = 0.010; HR: 1.407, 95% CI: 1.103-1.794, P = 0.006; DFS: 72.8% vs 65.1%, P = 0.002; HR: 1.347, 95% CI: 1.110-1.633, P = 0.002) groups. Conclusions This study found that nMLN > 3 and LNR > 0.11 were associated with poor prognosis in CC patients.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Should the Number of Metastatic Pelvic Lymph Nodes Be Integrated into the 2018 Figo Staging Classification of Early Stage Cervical Cancer? [J].
Anchora, Luigi Pedone ;
Carbone, Vittoria ;
Gallotta, Valerio ;
Fanfani, Francesco ;
Cosentino, Francesco ;
Turco, Luigi Carlo ;
Fedele, Camilla ;
Bizzarri, Nicolo ;
Scambia, Giovanni ;
Ferrandina, Gabriella .
CANCERS, 2020, 12 (06) :1-12
[2]  
Aslan K, 2020, J GYNECOL ONCOL, V31
[3]   Utility of PET-CT to evaluate retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis in advanced cervical cancer: Results of ACRIN6671/GOG0233 trial [J].
Atri, Mostafa ;
Zhang, Zheng ;
Dehdashti, Farrokh ;
Lee, Susanna I. ;
Ali, Shamshad ;
Marques, Helga ;
Koh, Wui-Jin ;
Moore, Kathleen ;
Landrum, Lisa ;
Kim, Jae Weon ;
DiSilvestro, Paul ;
Eisenhauer, Eric ;
Schnell, Frederick ;
Gold, Michael .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 142 (03) :413-419
[4]  
Bedford Simone, 2009, Br J Nurs, V18, P80
[5]   Cancer of the cervix uteri: 2021 update [J].
Bhatla, Neerja ;
Aoki, Daisuke ;
Sharma, Daya Nand ;
Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2021, 155 :28-44
[6]   Cancer of the cervix uteri [J].
Bhatla, Neerja ;
Aoki, Daisuke ;
Sharma, Daya Nand ;
Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2018, 143 :22-36
[7]   Oncologic outcomes in the era of modern radiation therapy using FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer [J].
Brodeur, Melica Nourmoussavi ;
Dejean, Romain ;
Beauchemin, Marie-Claude ;
Samouelian, Vanessa ;
Cormier, Beatrice ;
Bacha, Omar Moreira ;
Warkus, Thomas ;
Barkati, Maroie .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 162 (02) :277-283
[8]   Survival After Abdominal Q-M Type B versus C2 Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer [J].
Chen, Chunlin ;
Wang, Wuliang ;
Liu, Ping ;
Li, Pengfei ;
Wang, Lu ;
Jin, Shuangling ;
Bin, Xiaonong ;
Lang, Jinghe .
CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2019, 11 :10909-10919
[9]   Prognostic value of tumor measurement parameters and SCC-Ag changes in patients with locally-advanced cervical cancer [J].
Chen, Wenjuan ;
Xiu, Siyi ;
Xie, Xingyun ;
Guo, Huiming ;
Xu, Yuanji ;
Bai, Penggang ;
Xia, Xiaoyi .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 17 (01)
[10]   Significance of the Absolute Number and Ratio of Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Predicting Postoperative Survival for the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IA2 to IIA Cervical Cancer [J].
Chen, Ying ;
Zhang, Lei ;
Tian, Jing ;
Fu, Xin ;
Ren, Xiubao ;
Hao, Quan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2013, 23 (01) :157-163