Secondary production of the central rangeland region of the United States

被引:4
作者
Raynor, Edward J. [1 ]
Derner, Justin D. [2 ]
Hartman, Melannie D. [3 ]
Dorich, Christopher D. [3 ]
Parton, William J. [3 ]
Hendrickson, John R. [4 ]
Harmoney, Keith R. [5 ]
Brennan, Jameson R. [6 ]
Owensby, Clenton E. [7 ]
Kaplan, Nicole E. [8 ]
Lutz, Susan M. [2 ]
Hoover, David L. [8 ]
Augustine, David J. [8 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Agnext, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Rangeland Resources & Syst Res Unit, Cheyenne, WY USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Nat Resource Ecol Lab, Ft Collins, CO USA
[4] USDA ARS, Northern Great Plains Res Lab, Mandan, ND USA
[5] Kansas State Univ, Agr Res Ctr, Hays, KS USA
[6] South Dakota State Univ, West River Agr Ctr, Rapid City, SD USA
[7] Kansas State Univ, Dept Agron, Manhattan, KS USA
[8] USDA ARS, Rangeland Resources & Syst Res Unit, Ft Collins, CO USA
基金
美国农业部; 美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
aboveground net primary production; Bouteloua gracilis; differential sensitivity; large grazer production; net secondary production; Poa pratensis; regional trophic efficiency; NORTHERN GREAT-PLAINS; INTENSIVE-EARLY STOCKING; KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS; CLIMATE; SENSITIVITY; EFFICIENCY; DIVERSITY; DYNAMICS; DROUGHT; VEGETATION;
D O I
10.1002/eap.2978
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Rangelands are the dominant land use across a broad swath of central North America where they span a wide gradient, from <350 to >900 mm, in mean annual precipitation. Substantial efforts have examined temporal and spatial variation in aboveground net primary production (ANPP) to precipitation (PPT) across this gradient. In contrast, net secondary productivity (NSP, e.g., primary consumer production) has not been evaluated analogously. However, livestock production, which is a form of NSP or primary consumer production supported by primary production, is the dominant non-cultivated land use and an integral economic driver in these regions. Here, we used long-term (mean length = 19 years) ANPP and NSP data from six research sites across the Central Great Plains with a history of a conservative stocking to determine resource (i.e., PPT)-productivity relationships, NSP sensitivities to dry-year precipitation, and regional trophic efficiencies (e.g., NSP:ANPP ratio). PPT-ANPP relationships were linear for both temporal (site-based) and spatial (among site) gradients. The spatial PPT-NSP model revealed that PPT mediated a saturating relationship for NSP as sites became more mesic, a finding that contrasts with many plant-based PPT-ANPP relationships. A saturating response to high growing-season precipitation suggests biogeochemical rather than vegetation growth constraints may govern NSP (i.e., large herbivore production). Differential sensitivity in NSP to dry years demonstrated that the primary consumer production response heightened as sites became more xeric. Although sensitivity generally decreased with increasing precipitation as predicted from known PPT-ANPP relationships, evidence suggests that the dominant species' identity and traits influenced secondary production efficiency. Non-native northern mixed-grass prairie was outperformed by native Central Great Plains rangeland in sensitivity to dry years and efficiency in converting ANPP to NSP. A more comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms leading to differences in producer and consumer responses will require multisite experiments to assess biotic and abiotic determinants of multi-trophic level efficiency and sensitivity.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   BURNING BLUESTEM RANGE [J].
ANDERSON, KL ;
SMITH, EF ;
OWENSBY, CE .
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1970, 23 (02) :81-&
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2023, R: A language and environment for statistical computing
[3]   Thinking Like a Grassland: Challenges and Opportunities for Biodiversity Conservation in the Great Plains of North America [J].
Augustine, David ;
Davidson, Ana ;
Dickinson, Kristin ;
Van Pelt, Bill .
RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 78 :281-295
[4]   Elevated CO2 induces substantial and persistent declines in forage quality irrespective of warming in mixedgrass prairie [J].
Augustine, David J. ;
Blumenthal, Dana M. ;
Springer, Tim L. ;
LeCain, Daniel R. ;
Gunter, Stacey A. ;
Derner, Justin D. .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2018, 28 (03) :721-735
[5]   Nutrient dynamics on a precipitation gradient in Hawai'i [J].
Austin, AT ;
Vitousek, PM .
OECOLOGIA, 1998, 113 (04) :519-529
[6]   A STOCKING-RATE GUIDE FOR BEEF PRODUCTION ON BLUE-GRAMA RANGE [J].
BEMENT, RE .
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1969, 22 (02) :83-&
[7]   Forage provision is more affected by droughts in arid and semi-arid than in mesic rangelands [J].
Bondaruk, Viviana F. ;
Onatibia, Gaston R. ;
Fernandez, Roberto J. ;
Aguero, Walter ;
Blanco, Lisandro ;
Bruschetti, Martin ;
Kropfl, Alicia ;
Loydi, Alejandro ;
Pascual, Jesus ;
Peri, Pablo ;
Peter, Guadalupe ;
Quiroga, R. Emiliano ;
Yahdjian, Laura .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2022, 59 (09) :2404-2418
[8]  
Briske D.D., 2011, CONSERVATION BENEFIT
[9]   Climate-change adaptation on rangelands: linking regional exposure with diverse adaptive capacity [J].
Briske, David D. ;
Joyce, Linda A. ;
Polley, H. Wayne ;
Brown, Joel R. ;
Wolter, Klaus ;
Morgan, Jack A. ;
McCarl, Bruce A. ;
Bailey, Derek W. .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 13 (05) :249-256
[10]   REGIONAL-ANALYSIS OF THE CENTRAL GREAT-PLAINS - SENSITIVITY TO CLIMATE VARIABILITY [J].
BURKE, IC ;
KITTEL, TGF ;
LAUENROTH, WK ;
SNOOK, P ;
YONKER, CM ;
PARTON, WJ .
BIOSCIENCE, 1991, 41 (10) :685-692