How convenience and informational tools shape waste separation behavior: A social network approach

被引:4
作者
Cheng X. [1 ]
Li W. [2 ]
Yang J. [1 ]
Zhang L. [3 ]
机构
[1] College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing
[2] Business School, Jiangsu Normal University, Jiangsu, Xuzhou
[3] School of Public Finance and Taxation, Nanjing University of Finance & Economics, Nanjing
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Convenience tool; Informational tool; Multiagent simulation; Social interaction; Waste separation behavior;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104152
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Geopolitical risks such as energy crises and local or regional instability aggravate the growing conflict between limited natural resources and increasing consumption, making waste management—using waste as a resource—one of the most urgent agendas in the sustainability domain. Considering individuals' dual attributes (i.e., attitudes and behaviors), we develop an interaction model to investigate waste separation behavior that accounts for convenience and informational tools. Multiagent simulations are performed using data collected from 1056 residents in the top ten Chinese cities by volume of household waste. The results indicate that convenience tools can induce residents to separate waste. In particular, a 160% increase in the adoption rate is observed in response to decreasing (increasing) the distance to collection sites (accessibility to temporary storage facilities for recyclables) from 10 (0) to 0 (10). Publicity and education promote waste separation, as approximately 72% of individuals choose to separate waste when increasing the intensity of popular science propaganda from 0 to 0.2. Interestingly, social interaction appears to have a two-sided effect on waste separation behavior. The adoption rate of such behavior increases with the number of one's connections in sparse social networks, whereas the opposite is found in close social networks. The findings reveal the differentiated impacts of convenience and informational tools on waste minimization and provide new ideas for formulating customized strategies to promote waste separation in sparse (increasing individuals' number of connections) or close (monitoring rumors to achieve a tightly controlled intensity of interaction) social network scenarios. © 2023 Elsevier Ltd
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 127 条
[1]  
Anshassi M., Townsend T., The hidden economic and environmental costs of eliminating kerb-side recycling, Nat. Sustain., 6, pp. 919-928, (2023)
[2]  
Ajzen I., The theory of planned behavior, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 50, 2, pp. 179-211, (1991)
[3]  
Alhassan H., Kwakwa P., Owusu-Sekyere E., Households' source separation behaviour and solid waste disposal options in Ghana's Millennium City, J. Environ. Manag., 259, (2020)
[4]  
Al-Khateeb A., Al-Sari M., Al-Khatib I., Et al., Factors affecting the sustainability of solid waste management system-the case of Palestine, Environ. Monit. Assess., 189, 2, (2017)
[5]  
Allen S., Dietz T., McCright A., Measuring household energy efficiency behaviors with attention to behavioral plasticity in the United States, Energy Res. Social Sci., 10, pp. 133-140, (2015)
[6]  
Andrade R., van Riper C., Goodson D., Et al., Values shift in response to social learning through deliberation about protected areas, Global Environ. Change, 78, (2013)
[7]  
Ao Y., Zhu H., Wang Y., Et al., Identifying the driving factors of rural residents' household waste classification behavior: evidence from Sichuan, China, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 180, (2022)
[8]  
Aschemann-Witzel J., Gim'enez A., Ares G., Convenience or price orientation? Consumer characteristics influencing food waste behaviour in the context of an emerging country and the impact on future sustainability of the global food sector, Global Environ. Change, 49, pp. 85-94, (2018)
[9]  
Auger P., Devinney T., Do what consumers say matter? The misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions, J. Bus. Ethics, 76, 4, pp. 361-383, (2007)
[10]  
Authelet M., Subervie J., Meyfroidt P., Et al., Economic, pro-social and proenvironmental factors influencing participation in an incentive-based conservation program in Bolivia, World Dev., 145, (2021)