Influence of slag and recycled concrete aggregates contents on the performance of fly ash based self-compacted geopolymer concrete

被引:0
|
作者
Sherwani, Aryan Far H. [1 ,2 ]
Younis, Khaleel H. [3 ,4 ]
Arndt, Ralf W. [2 ]
Pilakoutas, Kypros [5 ]
机构
[1] Soran Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Soran 44008, Kurdistan Regio, Iraq
[2] Fachhsch Erfurt Univ Appl Sci, Dept Civil Engn, D-99084 Erfurt, Germany
[3] Erbil Polytech Univ, Erbil Technol Coll, Dept Surveying & Rd Construct, Erbil 44001, Iraq
[4] Tishk Int Univ, Civil Engn Dept, Erbil 44001, Kurdistan Regio, Iraq
[5] Univ Sheffield, Civil & Struct Engn Dept, Sheffield S1 3JD, England
关键词
Self-compacted geopolymer concrete (SCGC); Ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS)/fly ash (FA); Recycled concrete aggregate (RA); Fresh properties; Mechanical properties; Fracture parameters; BLAST-FURNACE SLAG; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; ABSORPTION CHARACTERISTICS; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES; WORKABILITY; DURABILITY; BEHAVIOR; GGBFS;
D O I
10.1007/s41062-024-01641-z
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Geopolymers are considered a sustainable substitute for Ordinary Portland Cement, but they do have an impact on the early age and long-term qualities of concrete, specifically its workability. This study evaluates the feasibility of developing sustainable self-compacted geopolymer concrete, using recycled concrete aggregates. The geopolymer consisted of ground granulated blast furnace slag and fly ash activated with sodium alkalis. The fly ash was replaced with slag at contents of 50% and 70% while the natural coarse aggregates was replaced with recycled concrete aggregates at contents of 30%, 50%, and 100%. A series of five mixes were designated in this study with a total binder content of (450 kg/m3) and an alkaline/binder ratio of 0.5. There were three mixes of self-compacting geopolymer concrete that were made using different amounts of recycled concrete aggregates 0%, 50%, and 100%. Additionally, there were two more mixes that used 100% recycled concrete aggregates, but with different proportions of fly ash and slag binders: 70% fly ash and 30% slag, and 50% fly ash and 50% slag. The fresh properties were assessed through slump flow, J-ring flow, V-funnel, J-rig height, L-box, and sieve segregation tests. Compressive strength, flexural strength, and static modulus of elasticity in terms of mechanical characteristics and fracture parameters such as the load-displacement curve, fracture energy, and stress intensity factor were also measured. The sorptivity of the developed mixtures was also evaluated in this study. The findings confirm that recycled concrete aggregates and slag negatively affect the workability of self-compacted geopolymer concrete mixtures, except for segregation resistance. The mechanical properties, fracture parameters, and sorptivity of fly ash based self-compacted geopolymer concrete are reduced by recycled concrete aggregates and enhanced by slag. It was found that a high-strength (77 MPa) self-compacted geopolymer concrete can be made with a mix containing 50/50 fly ash/slag and 100% recycled concrete aggregates. The results were compared with prediction models of mechanical properties developed by standard codes of practice and previous studies. It was shown that these predictive models do not effectively capture the properties of the self-compacted geopolymer concrete.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Combined Influence of Fly Ash and Recycled Coarse Aggregates on Strength and Economic Performance of Concrete
    Ali, Babar
    Qureshi, Liaqat A.
    Nawaz, Muhammad A.
    Aslam, Usman
    CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-TEHRAN, 2019, 5 (04): : 832 - 844
  • [22] Influence of slag on mechanical and durability properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete
    Ramamohana Reddy Bellum
    Karthikeyan Muniraj
    Sri Rama Chand Madduru
    Journal of the Korean Ceramic Society, 2020, 57 : 530 - 545
  • [23] Influence of slag on mechanical and durability properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete
    Bellum, Ramamohana Reddy
    Muniraj, Karthikeyan
    Madduru, Sri Rama Chand
    Journal of the Korean Ceramic Society, 2020, 57 (05): : 530 - 545
  • [24] Mechanical performance of roller compacted concrete with recycled concrete aggregates
    Lopez-Uceda, Antonio
    Agrela, Francisco
    Cabrera, Manuel
    Ayuso, Jesus
    Lopez, Martin
    ROAD MATERIALS AND PAVEMENT DESIGN, 2018, 19 (01) : 36 - 55
  • [25] Combined effect of using steel fibers and demolition waste aggregates on the performance of fly ash/slag based geopolymer concrete
    Lakew, Asfaw Mekonnen
    Canpolat, Orhan
    Al-Mashhadani, Mukhallad M.
    Uysal, Mucteba
    Nis, Anil
    Aygormez, Yurdakul
    Bayati, Mohammad
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2023, 27 (15) : 4251 - 4278
  • [26] Performance evaluation of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete incorporating nano slag
    Ali, I. M.
    Naje, A. S.
    Al-Zubaidi, H. A. M.
    Al-Kateeb, R. T.
    GLOBAL NEST JOURNAL, 2019, 21 (01): : 70 - 75
  • [27] Performance evaluation of fly ash/slag based geopolymer concrete beams with addition of lime
    Kalaivani, M.
    Shyamala, G.
    Ramesh, S.
    Angusenthil, K.
    Jagadeesan, R.
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 27 : 652 - 656
  • [28] Effect of sea sand and recycled aggregate replacement on fly ash/slag-based geopolymer concrete
    Li, Weiwen
    Huang, Xinlin
    Zhao, Jiali
    Huang, Yujie
    Shumuye, Eskinder Desta
    Yang, Xu
    MATERIALS SCIENCE-POLAND, 2021, 39 (04) : 580 - 598
  • [29] Fly ash, GGBS, and silica fume based geopolymer concrete with recycled aggregates: Properties and environmental impacts
    Singh, Rudra Pratap
    Vanapalli, Kumar Raja
    Cheela, Venkata Ravi Sankar
    Peddireddy, Sreekanth Reddy
    Sharma, Hari Bhakta
    Mohanty, Bijayananda
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2023, 378
  • [30] Carbonation Resistance of Fly Ash-Slag Based Geopolymer Concrete
    Yuan Y.
    Zhao R.
    Zhan Y.
    Li F.
    Cheng Z.
    Li J.
    Xinan Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56 (06): : 1275 - 1282