Outcomes of minimal access retroperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer

被引:1
作者
Newton, Claire [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Graham, Radha [3 ]
Liberale, Viola [3 ]
Burnell, Matthew [4 ]
Menon, Usha [4 ]
Mould, Tim [3 ]
Olaitan, Adeola [3 ]
Macdonald, Nicola [3 ]
Widschwendter, Martin [3 ,5 ]
Doufekas, Kostas [3 ]
Mccormack, Mary [3 ]
Mitra, Anita [3 ]
Arora, Rupali [3 ]
Manchanda, Ranjit [4 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bristol NHS Fdn trust, Gynaecol Oncol, Bristol, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Bristol, England
[3] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[4] UCL, Inst Clin Trials & Methodol, MRC Clin Trials Unit, London, England
[5] Leopold Franzens Univ Innsbruck, European Translat Oncol Prevent & Screening Inst, Innsbruck, Austria
[6] Queen Mary Univ London, Wolfson Inst Populat Hlth, London, England
[7] Barts Hlth NHS Trust, Royal London Hosp, London, England
[8] All India Inst Med Sci AIIMS, Oncol, New Delhi, India
关键词
Cervical cancer; lymphadenectomy; EXTENDED-FIELD IRRADIATION; LYMPH-NODE DEBULKING; BULKY STAGE-IB; RADIATION-THERAPY; EXTRAPERITONEAL; RADIOTHERAPY; COMPLICATIONS; CHEMOTHERAPY; MULTICENTER; DISSECTION;
D O I
10.1080/01443615.2024.2344529
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundTo evaluate outcomes of laparoscopic retroperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy for stage 1b3-3b cervical cancer.MethodsPathology databases searched for all para-aortic lymphadenectomy cases 2005-2016. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse baseline characteristics, cox models for treatment affect after accounting for variables, and Kaplan Meier curves for survival (STATA v15).Results191 patients had 1b3-3b cervical cancer of which 110 patients had Para-aortic lymphadenectomy. 8 (7.3%) patients stage 1b3, 82 (74.6%) stage 2b, and 20 (18.1%) stage 3b cervical cancer. Mean lymph node count 11.7 (SD7.6). The intra-operative and post-operative 30 day complication rates were 8.8% (CI: 4.3%, 15.7%) and 5.3% (CI: 1.9%, 11.2%) respectively.Para-aortic nodes were apparently positive on CT/MRI in 5/110 (5%) cases. Cancer was found in 10 (8.9%, CI: 4.3%, 15.7%) cases on histology, all received extended field radiotherapy. Only 2 were identified on pre-operative CT/MRI imaging. 3 of 10 suspected node-positive cases on CT/MRI had negative histology. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy led to alteration in staging and radiotherapy management in 8 (8%, CI: 3.7%, 14.6%) patients. Mean overall survival 42.81 months (SD = 31.79 months). Survival was significantly higher for women undergoing PAN (50.57 (SD 30.7) months) compared to those who didn't (31.27 (SD 32.5) months)Results191 patients had 1b3-3b cervical cancer of which 110 patients had Para-aortic lymphadenectomy. 8 (7.3%) patients stage 1b3, 82 (74.6%) stage 2b, and 20 (18.1%) stage 3b cervical cancer. Mean lymph node count 11.7 (SD7.6). The intra-operative and post-operative 30 day complication rates were 8.8% (CI: 4.3%, 15.7%) and 5.3% (CI: 1.9%, 11.2%) respectively.Para-aortic nodes were apparently positive on CT/MRI in 5/110 (5%) cases. Cancer was found in 10 (8.9%, CI: 4.3%, 15.7%) cases on histology, all received extended field radiotherapy. Only 2 were identified on pre-operative CT/MRI imaging. 3 of 10 suspected node-positive cases on CT/MRI had negative histology. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy led to alteration in staging and radiotherapy management in 8 (8%, CI: 3.7%, 14.6%) patients. Mean overall survival 42.81 months (SD = 31.79 months). Survival was significantly higher for women undergoing PAN (50.57 (SD 30.7) months) compared to those who didn't (31.27 (SD 32.5) months)ConclusionLaparoscopic retroperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy is an acceptable procedure which can guide treatment in women with locally advanced cervical cancer. We evaluated outcomes for patients with stage 1b3-3b cervical cancer that had lymph nodes removed prior to planning their chemoradiotherapy. There were 3 groups - patients that had their lymph nodes removed, those that did not and those that had their procedure abandoned so didn't have their lymph nodes removed. We looked at the lymph nodes down the microscope to see if they contained cancer and compared this to their pre-operative imaging. 8 patients had a change to their staging and treatment because they were found to have cancer in the lymph nodes. We found that the keyhole procedure to remove lymph nodes is an acceptable procedure which can guide treatment in women with locally advanced cervical cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Morbidity of pelvic lymphadenectomy and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer
    Agar, Nicolas
    Philippe, Anne-Cecile
    Bourdel, Nicolas
    Rabischong, Benoit
    Canis, Michel
    Le Bouedec, Guillaume
    Mulliez, Aurelien
    Dauplat, Jacques
    Pomel, Christophe
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2015, 102 (05) : 428 - 435
  • [32] Robot assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the management of advanced cervical carcinoma
    Fastrez, Maxime
    Vandromme, Jean
    George, Pascale
    Rozenberg, Serge
    Degueldre, Michel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2009, 147 (02) : 226 - 229
  • [33] Does ultrasonic advanced energy reduce lymphocele incidence in laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy?
    Lamblin, Gery
    Chauvy, Lauriane
    Rannou, Corinne
    Mathevet, Patrice
    Chabert, Philippe
    Mellier, Georges
    Chene, Gautier
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2015, 185 : 53 - 58
  • [34] Comparison of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy versus para-aortic lymphadenectomy alone for locally advanced FIGO stage IB2 to IIB cervical cancer using a propensity score matching analysis: Results from the FRANCOGYN study group
    Bendifallah, Sofiane
    de Foucher, Tiphaine
    Ouldamer, Lobna
    Bricou, Alexandre
    Lavoue, Vincent
    Varinot, Justine
    Canlorbe, Geoffroy
    Carcopino, Xavier
    Raimond, Emilie
    Huguet, Florence
    Graesslin, Olivier
    Touboul, Cyril
    Collinet, Pierre
    Huchon, Cyrille
    Darai, Emile
    Ballester, Marcos
    EJSO, 2018, 44 (12): : 1921 - 1928
  • [35] Prevalence of Para-Aortic Lymphadenopathy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer using Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Study
    Yunusa, Garba Haruna
    Aliyu, Usman Malami
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2020, 14 (10)
  • [36] Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer A Prospective Correlation of Surgical Findings With Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Findings
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    Jhingran, Anuja
    Macapinlac, Homer A.
    Euscher, Elizabeth D.
    Munsell, Mark F.
    Coleman, Robert L.
    Soliman, Pamela T.
    Schmeler, Kathleen M.
    Frumovitz, Michael
    Ramondetta, Lois M.
    CANCER, 2011, 117 (09) : 1928 - 1934
  • [37] Robotic retroperitoneal lower para-aortic lymphadenectomy in cervical carcinoma: First report on the technique used in 5 patients
    Vergote, Ignace
    Pouseele, Bram
    Van Gorp, Toon
    Vanacker, Bernard
    Leunen, Karin
    Cadron, Isabelle
    Neven, Patrick
    Amant, Frederic
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2008, 87 (07) : 783 - 787
  • [38] Para-aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: Experience of the Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Bogota, D.C., Colombia
    Acosta, Jesus
    Buitrago, Lina
    Rodriguez, Juliana
    Peralta, Jonathan
    Velasquez, Juan
    Saenz, James
    Lalinde, Juan
    REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE CANCEROLOGIA, 2022, 26 (04): : 391 - 402
  • [39] Role of complete para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer
    Fujimoto, Toshio
    Fukuda, Jun
    Tanaka, Toshinobu
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 21 (01) : 10 - 14
  • [40] Histological results of para-aortic lymph node dissection in patients with negative PET-CT for locally advanced cervical cancer in Reunion Island
    Futcher, F.
    Tran, P. L.
    Ah-Kit, X.
    Habib, N.
    Von Theobald, P.
    Birsan, A.
    Boukerrou, M.
    Balaya, V
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2025, 54 (05)