Impact of workplace incivility on choice of coping strategies: A mixed method study

被引:1
作者
Hashemi, Bahar [1 ]
Shrivastava, Anita [1 ]
机构
[1] Middlesex Univ, Dept psychol, Knowledge Pk, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Coping; incivility; job performance; work stress; EXPERIENCING INCIVILITY; MODERATING ROLE; WORK; BEHAVIORS; RESPONSES; PROFILES; OUTCOMES; SUPPORT; STRESS;
D O I
10.1080/15555240.2024.2337942
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This research drew upon a mixed-method approach to gain further insight into workplace incivility and its impact on an employee's preferred choice of coping strategies (Avoidant Coping, Task Focused Coping, and Emotion Focused Coping). Utilizing a convenience sampling approach, data was collected from working adults that were employed in companies within the United Arab Emirates for a period of at least 6 months (N = 151). Three simple linear regressions and an inductive thematic analysis were conducted to analyze the quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative findings revealed that workplace incivility significantly predicted avoidant coping as well as emotion focused coping. The complementary thematic analysis further revealed that employees who were a target of incivility were negatively impacted and often looked to trusted confidants to share their experiences with. The results of this study hope to be used as a base for developing intervention initiatives in organizations to prevent workplace incivility from escalating to more aggressive forms of behavior by providing employees with the support needed to better cope and address such situations. Implementing programs such as mindfulness training, cognitive-behavioral stress management, and proactive coping interventions are recommended to better support employees in the workplace.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 216
页数:23
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Alola U., 2018, Academic Journal of Economic Studies, V4, P141, DOI DOI 10.3390/IJERPH192114491
[2]   Organization Sustainability through Human Resource Capital: The Impacts of Supervisor Incivility and Self-Efficacy [J].
Alola, Uju Violet ;
Avci, Turgay ;
Ozturen, Ali .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (08)
[3]   Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace [J].
Andersson, LM ;
Pearson, CM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1999, 24 (03) :452-471
[4]  
Bambi Stefano, 2017, Acta Biomed, V88, P39, DOI 10.23750/abm.v88i5-S.6838
[5]  
Ben-Zur H., 2009, INT J STRESS MANAGE, V16, P87, DOI [10.1037/a0015731, DOI 10.1037/A0015731]
[6]   A model of stress and coping and their influence on individual and organizational outcomes [J].
Boyd, Nancy G. ;
Lewin, Jeffrey E. ;
Sager, Jeffrey K. .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2009, 75 (02) :197-211
[7]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
[8]   Observers' reactions to workplace incivility in the masculine domain: How does role congruency explain gender bias in future workers? [J].
Carmona-Cobo, Isabel ;
Lopez-Zafra, Esther ;
Garrosa, Eva .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 60 (06) :628-636
[9]   Workplace incivility and its socio-demographic determinants in India [J].
Chaudhary, Richa ;
Lata, Madhu ;
Firoz, Mantasha .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT, 2022, 33 (03) :357-384
[10]  
Cortina L M, 2001, J Occup Health Psychol, V6, P64, DOI 10.1037/1076-8998.6.1.64