Observability-Based Sensor Placement Improves Contaminant Tracing in River Networks

被引:9
作者
Bartos M. [1 ]
Kerkez B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
[2] Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
来源
Bartos, Matthew (mdbartos@utexas.edu) | 1600年 / John Wiley and Sons Inc卷 / 57期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
contaminant source identification; networks; observability; sensor placement; surface water quality;
D O I
10.1029/2020WR029551
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study presents a new methodology for identifying near-optimal sensor locations for contaminant source tracing in river networks. We define an optimal sensor placement as one that enables the best overall reconstruction of contaminant concentrations from observed data. To establish a physical basis for the problem, we first derive a linear time-invariant (LTI) model for riverine contaminant transport using the one-dimensional advection-reaction-diffusion equation. We then formulate an optimization problem to find the sensor placement that maximizes the observability of the modeled system and identify two heuristics for efficiently achieving this goal. By evaluating each sensor placement strategy on its ability to reconstruct initial contaminant loads from observed outputs, we find that the best sensor placement is obtained by maximizing the rank of the LTI system's Observability Gramian. This sensor placement strategy enables the best overall reconstruction of both magnitudes and distributions of nonpoint-source contaminants. Our methodology will enable researchers to build sensor networks that better interpolate pollutant loads in ungauged locations, improve contaminant source identification, and inform more effective pollution control strategies. © 2021. The Authors.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
Bartos M., Kerkez B., Hydrograph peak-shaving using a graph-theoretic algorithm for placement of hydraulic control structures, Advances in Water Resources, 127, pp. 167-179, (2019)
[2]  
Bartos M., Wong B., Kerkez B., Open storm: A complete framework for sensing and control of urban watersheds, Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 4, 3, pp. 346-358, (2018)
[3]  
Behmel S., Damour M., Ludwig R., Rodriguez M., Water quality monitoring strategies—A review and future perspectives, The Science of the Total Environment, 571, pp. 1312-1329, (2016)
[4]  
Berry J., Hart W.E., Phillips C.A., Uber J.G., Watson J.-P., Sensor placement in municipal water networks with temporal integer programming models, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 132, 4, pp. 218-224, (2006)
[5]  
Boano F., Harvey J.W., Marion A., Packman A.I., Revelli R., Ridolfi L., Worman A., Hyporheic flow and transport processes: Mechanisms, models, and biogeochemical implications, Reviews of Geophysics, 52, 4, pp. 603-679, (2014)
[6]  
Boyd J.W., The new face of the Clean Water Act: A critical review of the EPA's proposed TMDL rules, Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum, 11, (2000)
[7]  
Bradley P.M., Journey C.A., Button D.T., Carlisle D.M., Huffman B.J., Qi S.L., Metre P.C.V., Multi-region assessment of pharmaceutical exposures and predicted effects in USA wadeable urban-gradient streams, PloS One, 15, 1, (2020)
[8]  
Carpenter J.F., Vallet B., Pelletier G., Lessard P., Vanrolleghem P.A., Pollutant removal efficiency of a retrofitted stormwater detention pond, Water Quality Research Journal, 49, 2, pp. 124-134, (2013)
[9]  
Carr G.M., Neary J.P., Water quality for ecosystem and human health, (2008)
[10]  
Castello C.C., Fan J., Davari A., Chen R.-X., Optimal sensor placement strategy for environmental monitoring using wireless sensor networks, In 2010 42nd Southeastern Symposium on System Theory (SSST 2010), (2010)