Interpretable Deep Knowledge Tracing

被引:0
|
作者
Liu K. [1 ]
Li X. [1 ]
Tang J. [1 ]
Zhao X. [1 ]
机构
[1] Science and Technology on Information Systems Engineering Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha
来源
Jisuanji Yanjiu yu Fazhan/Computer Research and Development | 2021年 / 58卷 / 12期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Attention; Context information; Interpretability; Knowledge tracing; Personalization;
D O I
10.7544/issn1000-1239.2021.20211021
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The task of knowledge tracing involves tracking users' cognitive states by modeling their exercise-answering sequence, predicting their performance over time, and achieving an intelligent assessment of the users' knowledge. Current works mainly model the skills related to the exercises, while ignoring the rich information contained in the contexts of exercises. Moreover, the current deep learning-based methods are agnostic, which undermines the explainability of the model. In this paper, we propose an interpretable deep knowledge tracking (IDKT) framework. First, we alleviate the data sparsity problem by using the contextual information of the exercises and skills to obtain more representative exercise and skill representations. Then the hidden knowledge states are fused with the aforementioned embeddings to learn a personalized attention, which is later used to aggregate neighbor embeddings in the exercise-skill graph. Finally, given a prediction result, an inference path is selected as the explanation based on the personalized attention. Compared with typical existing methods, IDKT exhibits its superiority by not only achieving the best prediction performance, but also providing an explanation at the inference path level for the prediction results. © 2021, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2618 / 2629
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Corbett A T, Anderson J R., Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 4, pp. 253-278, (1995)
  • [2] Piech C, Bassen J, Huang J, Et al., Deep knowledge tracing, Proc of the 28th Int Conf on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 505-513, (2015)
  • [3] Zhang Jiani, Shi Xingjian, King I, Et al., Dynamic key-value memory networks for knowledge tracing, Proc of the World Wide Web, pp. 765-774, (2017)
  • [4] Nakagawa H, Iwasawa Y, Matsuo Y., Graph-based knowledge tracing: Modeling student proficiency using graph neural network, Proc of the IEEE/WIC/ACM Int Conf on Web Intelligence, pp. 156-163, (2019)
  • [5] Liu Qi, Shen Shuanghong, Huang Zhenya, Et al., A survey of knowledge tracing
  • [6] Fan Xitao, Item response theory and classical test theory: An empirical comparison of their item/person statistics, Educational & Psychological Measurement, 58, 3, pp. 357-381, (1998)
  • [7] Dibello L V, Roussos L A, Stout W., A review of cognitively diagnostic assessment and a summary of psychometric models, Psychometrics, 26, 6, pp. 979-1030, (2006)
  • [8] Muraki E., Information functions of the generalized partial credit model, Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 4, pp. 351-363, (1993)
  • [9] Gong Yue, Beck J E, Heffernan N T., Comparing knowledge tracing and performance factor analysis by using multiple model fitting procedures, Proc of Int Conf on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 35-44, (2010)
  • [10] Huang Yun, Guerra-Hollstein J D, Brusilovsky P., A data-driven framework of modeling skill combinations for deeper knowledge tracing, Proc of the 9th Int Conf on Educational Data Mining, pp. 593-594, (2016)