Orthodontic pain control following arch wire placement; a comparison between pre-emptive tenoxicam and chewing gum: a randomized clinical trial

被引:3
|
作者
Basam, Lakshman Chowdary [1 ]
Singaraju, Gowri Sankar [2 ]
Obili, Sobitha [2 ]
Keerthipati, Thejasree [2 ]
Basam, Ram Chowdary [3 ]
Prasad, Mandava [2 ]
机构
[1] Sibar Inst Dent Sci, Dept Orthodont, Guntur, India
[2] Narayana Dent Coll, Dept Orthodont, Nellore 524003, Andhra Pradesh, India
[3] Sibar Inst Dent Sci, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Guntur, India
关键词
Chewing Gum; Orthodontic Treatment; Pain Control; Tenoxicam; LEVEL LASER THERAPY; PREOPERATIVE IBUPROFEN; PERCEPTION; MANAGEMENT; APPLIANCES; MOVEMENT;
D O I
10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.2.107
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Pain during fixed orthodontic treatment can have a detrimental effect on patient treatment compliance. To overcome this, there is a definite need to establish the best pain-relieving methods suitable for orthodontic patients in terms of efficacy and use. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of chewing gum and pre-emptive tenoxicam on pain after initial archwire placement and to evaluate the pain perceptions of orthodontic patients in the two groups while performing various functions at specific time intervals. Methods: Forty-two patients were selected and randomly divided into two groups: group A (chewing gum) and group B (pre-emptive tenoxicam). Pain perception was documented by patients immediately; at 4 h; at bedtime on the day of archwire placement; the next morning; at 24 h; and at bedtime on the 2nd, 3rd, and 7th day after the initial archwire placement. Pain scores were noted during fitting of the posterior teeth, biting, and chewing using a visual analog scale. The data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis. Results: Group A showed a significant increase in pain until the next morning while fitting the posterior teeth, biting, and chewing [36.2, 52.0, 33.4, respectively]], followed by a gradual decrease by the 7th day. Group B showed a significant increase in pain at bedtime on biting, with a peak value of 47.5. Pain on chewing, fitting posterior teeth, peaked the morning of the next day (100.0, 45.0). The Freidman test showed a statistically significant difference with a p-value of < 0.01. Higher pain scores were observed while chewing and biting compared with that while fitting the posterior teeth in both groups. The overall comparison of pain control between the two groups was not statistically significant [P > 0.05] between the two groups. Conclusions: Chewing gum was not inferior to pre-emptive tenoxicam. Thus, chewing gum is a non-pharmacological alternative to analgesics for orthodontic pain control that eliminates the chance of adverse reactions and can be used in the absence of adult observation.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 116
页数:10
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Chewing gum for pain control following orthodontic separator placement
    Azeem, Muhammad
    Khan, Dalia Iftikhar
    Jamal, Furqan
    Ali, Saqib
    Fatima, Mehrin
    Hayat, Muhammad Burhan
    Shakoor, Muhammad Usman
    JOURNAL OF THE WORLD FEDERATION OF ORTHODONTISTS, 2018, 7 (03) : 102 - 105
  • [2] Comparative assessment between chewing gum, bite wafers, and ibuprofen in pain control following separators placement among orthodontic patients
    Alshayea, Eman
    Aldweesh, Aljazi
    Albalbeesi, Hana
    Aldosari, Mohammad
    SAUDI DENTAL JOURNAL, 2024, 36 (07) : 1010 - 1014
  • [3] Comparative efficacy of pharmaceutical (Ibuprofen) and non-pharmaceutical (photobiomodulation, and chewing gum) interventions for pain reduction after elastomeric separator placement in orthodontic patients: a randomized clinical trial
    Azizi, Fatemeh
    Zaseh, Maryam Malekpour Salim
    Golshah, Amin
    Imani, Mohammad Moslem
    Safari-Faramani, Roya
    LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 39 (01)
  • [4] Pain relief after orthodontic archwire installation-a comparison between intervention with paracetamol and chewing gum: a randomized controlled trial
    Alshammari, Abdulrahman K.
    Huggare, Jan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2019, 41 (05) : 478 - 485
  • [5] Comparison of chewing gum and ibuprofen in alleviating orthodontic pain: a single centre, randomised clinical trial
    Delavarian, Mohadeseh
    Imani, Mohammad Moslem
    Delavarian, Fatemeh
    Bayani, Shahin
    AUSTRALASIAN ORTHODONTIC JOURNAL, 2020, 36 (01): : 38 - 44
  • [6] The effect of chewing gum on the impact, pain and breakages associated with fixed orthodontic appliances: a randomized clinical trial
    Benson, P. E.
    Razi, R. M.
    Al-Bloushi, R. J.
    ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2012, 15 (03) : 178 - 187
  • [7] Efficacy of Photobiomodulation Therapy for Orthodontic Pain Control Following the Placement of Elastomeric Separators: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Mirhashemi, AmirHossein
    Rasouli, Seyedreza
    Shahi, Shiva
    Chiniforush, Nasim
    JOURNAL OF LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 12 : 1 - 6
  • [8] Postoperative pain reduction by pre-emptive N-acetylcysteine: an exploratory randomized controlled clinical trial
    Mulkens, Chantal Elise
    Staatsen, Marieke
    van Genugten, Lucie
    Snoeker, Barbara A. M.
    Vissers, Kris C. P.
    Bruhn, Jorgen
    Bucx, Martin J. L.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2021, 46 (11) : 960 - 964
  • [9] Chewing gum as a non-pharmacological alternative for orthodontic pain relief: A randomized clinical trial using an intention-to-treat analysis
    da Silva Santos, Diego Junior
    Capelli Jr, Jonas
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2021, 51 (05) : 346 - 354
  • [10] Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field for pain caused by placement of initial orthodontic wire in female orthodontic patients: A preliminary single-blind randomized clinical trial
    Jung, Jin-Gon
    Park, Jae Hyun
    Kim, Sang-Cheol
    Kang, Kyung-Hwa
    Cho, Jin-Hyoung
    Cho, Jin-Woo
    Chang, Na-Young
    Bay, R. Curtis
    Chae, Jong-Moon
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 152 (05) : 582 - 591