A Decision-making Method for Swarm Agents in Attack-defense Confrontation

被引:3
作者
Wang, Lexing [1 ,2 ]
Qiu, Tenghai [1 ]
Pu, Zhiqiang [1 ,2 ]
Yi, Jianqiang [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Jinying [1 ]
Zhao, Yanjie [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Automat, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] China Acad Elect & Informat Technol, Beijing 100041, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Coalition formation; target allocation; decision-making;
D O I
10.1016/j.ifacol.2023.10.020
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The cooperative decision-making of swarm agents has attracted extensive attention from researchers due to its potential applications in multidisciplinary engineering problems. This paper studies a confrontation problem called asymmetric attack-defense confrontation (i.e., considering the difference in capability and quantity between agents and targets). The objective is to develop an effective self-organized swarm confrontation decision-making method. The decision-making process consists of task allocation decision and swarm motion decision. At each decision-making step, firstly, each agent forms a coalition with other agents autonomously by using a proposed hedonic coalition formation algorithm according to the attribute of targets. Thus, the agents assigned to the same target form a coalition, and swarm agents form several disjoint coalitions. Then, based on the allocated results, the agents are steered toward the corresponding target by a combat stimulus and a proposed selected interaction swarm algorithm. Finally, while the targets are within the agents' attack radius, the agents execute the confrontation decision. Simulation results show the effectiveness of the designed method. Copyright (c) 2023 The Authors.
引用
收藏
页码:7858 / 7864
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Asgharnia A, 2020, IEEE SYS MAN CYBERN, P381, DOI [10.1109/SMC42975.2020.9283173, 10.1109/smc42975.2020.9283173]
[2]   Nash Stable Outcomes in Fractional Hedonic Games: Existence, Efficiency and Computation [J].
Bilo, Vittorio ;
Fanelli, Angelo ;
Flammini, Michele ;
Monaco, Gianpiero ;
Moscardelli, Luca .
JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2018, 62 :315-371
[3]   Scalable hedonic coalition formation for task allocation with heterogeneous robots [J].
Czarnecki, Emily ;
Dutta, Ayan .
INTELLIGENT SERVICE ROBOTICS, 2021, 14 (03) :501-517
[4]  
Czarnecki E, 2019, IEEE SYS MAN CYBERN, P1024, DOI [10.1109/smc.2019.8913863, 10.1109/SMC.2019.8913863]
[5]   Cooperative Pursuit With Multi-Pursuer and One Faster Free-Moving Evader [J].
Fang, Xu ;
Wang, Chen ;
Xie, Lihua ;
Chen, Jie .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS, 2022, 52 (03) :1405-1414
[6]  
Kothari M., 2014, IFAC Proc., V47, P1977, DOI [10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.01992, DOI 10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.01992]
[7]   Potential games [J].
Monderer, D ;
Shapley, LS .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1996, 14 (01) :124-143
[8]   Flocking for multi-agent dynamic systems: Algorithms and theory [J].
Olfati-Saber, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2006, 51 (03) :401-420
[9]   Effectiveness of Autonomous Decision Making for Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles in Dogfight Engagements [J].
Ramirez Lopez, Nelson ;
Zbikowski, Rafal .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2018, 41 (04) :1015-1021
[10]   A Learning Invader for the "Guarding a Territory" Game A Reinforcement Learning Problem [J].
Raslan, Hashem ;
Schwartz, Howard ;
Givigi, Sidney .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, 2016, 83 (01) :55-70