Importance of resection margin after resection of colorectal liver metastases in the era of modern chemotherapy: population-based cohort study

被引:2
作者
Ostrand, Emil [1 ,2 ]
Rystedt, Jenny [1 ,2 ]
Engstrand, Jennie [3 ,4 ]
Fruhling, Petter [5 ,6 ]
Hemmingsson, Oskar [7 ]
Sandstrom, Per [8 ,9 ]
Eilard, Malin Sternby [10 ,11 ]
Tingstedt, Bobby [1 ,2 ]
Buchwald, Pamela [12 ,13 ]
机构
[1] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, SE-22185 Lund, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci Lund, Lund, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Div Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci Intervent & Technol CLINTEC, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Akad Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Uppsala, Sweden
[6] Uppsala Univ, Dept Surg Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
[7] Umea Univ, Dept Surg & Perioperat Sci, Umea, Sweden
[8] Linkoping Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Linkoping, Sweden
[9] Linkoping Univ, Dept Clin & Expt Med Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
[10] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Transplantat & Liver Surg, Gothenburg, Sweden
[11] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Clin Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[12] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Malmo, Sweden
[13] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci Malmo, Lund, Sweden
来源
BJS OPEN | 2024年 / 8卷 / 03期
关键词
HEPATIC RESECTION; SURGICAL RESECTION; PRIMARY TUMOR; R1; RESECTION; SURVIVAL; CANCER; SCORE; HEPATECTOMY; RECURRENCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1093/bjsopen/zrae035
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Resection margin has been associated with overall survival following liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis. The aim of this study was to examine how resection margins of 0.0 mm, 0.1-0.9 mm and >= 1 mm influence overall survival in patients resected for colorectal liver metastasis in a time of modern perioperative chemotherapy and surgery. Methods Using data from the national registries Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and Swedish National Quality Registry for Liver, Bile Duct and Gallbladder Cancer, patients that had liver resections for colorectal liver metastasis between 2009 and 2013 were included. In patients with a narrow or unknown surgical margin the original pathological reports were re-reviewed. Factors influencing overall survival were analysed using a Cox proportional hazard model. Results A total of 754 patients had a known margin status, of which 133 (17.6%) patients had a resection margin <1 mm. The overall survival in patients with a margin of 0 mm or 0.1-0.9 mm was 42 (95% c.i. 31 to 53) and 48 (95% c.i. 35 to 62) months respectively, compared with 75 (95% c.i. 65 to 85) for patients with >= 1 mm margin, P < 0.001. Margins of 0 mm or 0.1-0.9 mm were associated with poor overall survival in the multivariable analysis, HR 1.413 (95% c.i. 1.030 to 1.939), P = 0.032, and 1.399 (95% c.i. 1.025 to 1.910), P = 0.034, respectively. Conclusions Despite modern chemotherapy the resection margin is still an important factor for the survival of patients resected for colorectal liver metastasis, and a margin of >= 1 mm is needed to achieve the best possible outcome.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] The Oncosurgery Approach to Managing Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: A Multidisciplinary International Consensus
    Adam, Rene
    De Gramont, Aimery
    Figueras, Joan
    Guthrie, Ashley
    Kokudo, Norihiro
    Kunstlinger, Francis
    Loyer, Evelyne
    Poston, Graeme
    Rougier, Philippe
    Rubbia-Brandt, Laura
    Sobrero, Alberto
    Tabernero, Josep
    Teh, Catherine
    Van Cutsem, Eric
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2012, 17 (10) : 1225 - 1239
  • [2] Recurrence at surgical margin following hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases is not associated with R1 resection and does not impact survival
    Andreou, Andreas
    Knitter, Sebastian
    Schmelzle, Moritz
    Kradolfer, Daniel
    Maurer, Martin H.
    Auer, Timo Alexander
    Fehrenbach, Uli
    Lachenmayer, Anja
    Banz, Vanessa
    Schoning, Wenzel
    Candinas, Daniel
    Pratschke, Johann
    Beldi, Guido
    [J]. SURGERY, 2021, 169 (05) : 1061 - 1068
  • [3] Margin Status Remains an Important Determinant of Survival After Surgical Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Modern Chemotherapy
    Andreou, Andreas
    Aloia, Thomas A.
    Brouquet, Antoine
    Dickson, Paxton V.
    Zimmitti, Giuseppe
    Maru, Dipen M.
    Kopetz, Scott
    Loyer, Evelyne M.
    Curley, Steven A.
    Abdalla, Eddie K.
    Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 257 (06) : 1079 - 1088
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2021, National report from the Swedish rectal and colon cancer registries 2020
  • [5] Outcome of Microscopic Incomplete Resection (R1) of Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Ayez, Ninos
    Lalmahomed, Zarina S.
    Eggermont, Alexander M. M.
    Ijzermans, Jan N. M.
    de Jonge, Jeroen
    van Montfort, Kees
    Verhoef, Cornelis
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (05) : 1618 - 1627
  • [6] R1 Resection by Necessity for Colorectal Liver Metastases Is It Still a Contraindication to Surgery? Discussions
    Choti, Michael A.
    Blumgart, Leslie H.
    Greene, Frederick L.
    Clary, Bryan M.
    Adam, Rene
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 248 (04) : 636 - 637
  • [7] Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
    Dindo, D
    Demartines, N
    Clavien, PA
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) : 205 - 213
  • [8] DETERMINANTS OF SURVIVAL IN LIVER RESECTION FOR COLORECTAL SECONDARIES
    EKBERG, H
    TRANBERG, KG
    ANDERSSON, R
    LUNDSTEDT, C
    HAGERSTRAND, I
    RANSTAM, J
    BENGMARK, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 73 (09) : 727 - 731
  • [9] Elias D, 1998, J SURG ONCOL, V69, P88, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199810)69:2<88::AID-JSO8>3.0.CO
  • [10] 2-X