Semantic Mapping Methods Between Expert View and Ontology View

被引:0
作者
Chen D.-Y. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Zhao H. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Zhang X. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] School of Computer Science & Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang
[2] National Engineering Research Center for Computer Software, Northeastern University, Shenyang
[3] Neusoft Research of Intelligent Healthcare Technology, Co. Ltd., Shenyang
[4] Neusoft Corporation, Shenyang
来源
Chen, De-Yan (deyan_chen@126.com) | 1600年 / Chinese Academy of Sciences卷 / 31期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Domain semantic knowledge base; Expert view; Ontology; Ontology view; Problem solving; Semantic mapping;
D O I
10.13328/j.cnki.jos.005820
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Due to the powerful knowledge representation and reasoning ability, the ontology has been widely used in many domains. Nevertheless, the in-depth application of the ontology still faces many deep common semantic mapping problems. The existing ontology modeling methods only propose some simple guiding principles and basic steps, so that knowledge engineers still have no way to start. When constructing the domain semantic knowledge base based on the domain expert knowledge, the three types of common semantic mapping problems in the domain expert knowledge, such as polysemy, n-ary relationships, and security requirements, are studied in depth from five aspects, the corresponding semantic mapping methods are proposed, and 10 ontology modeling conventions are summarized. Finally, a complete application case is constructed and the five types of semantic mapping methods proposed in this study are evaluated. © Copyright 2020, Institute of Software, the Chinese Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2855 / 2882
页数:27
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Studer R, Benjamins VR, Fensel D., Knowledge engineering: Principles and methods, Data and Knowledge Engineering, 25, 1, pp. 161-197, (1998)
[2]  
Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O., The semantic Web: A new form of web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities, Scientific American, 284, 5, pp. 34-43, (2001)
[3]  
Hebeler J, Fisher M, Blace R, Perez-Lopez A., Semantic Web Programming, (2009)
[4]  
Manola F, Miller E, McBride B., RDF 1.1 primer, (2014)
[5]  
Brickley D, Guha RV., RDF schema 1.1, (2014)
[6]  
Smith MK, Welty C, McGuinness DL., OWL Web Ontology Language Guide, (2004)
[7]  
Sure Y, Angele J, Staab S., OntoEdit: Multifaceted inferencing for ontology engineering, Journal on Data Semantics I, 2800, pp. 128-152, (2003)
[8]  
KAON: The karlsruhe ontology and semantic Web tool suite
[9]  
Antoniou G, Harmelen FV., A Semantic Web Primer, (2008)
[10]  
Kim IW, Lee KH., A model-driven approach for describing semantic Webservices: From UML to OWL-S, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part C: Applications and Reviews, 39, 6, pp. 637-646, (2009)