Manager Mobility and Private Equity Syndications from the Perspective of Coupling Networks: Evidence from China's Private Equity Industry

被引:0
作者
Ren J. [1 ]
Li X. [2 ]
Cao L. [3 ]
机构
[1] School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing
[2] School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing
[3] University of Chicago, Division of Social Sciences, Chicago, 60637, IL
来源
Journal of Social Computing | 2023年 / 4卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
coupling networks; driving force; manager mobility; network structure; resistance force; syndication;
D O I
10.23919/JSC.2023.0012
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study explores whether manager mobility can influence syndications between private equity (PE) firms by constructing coupling network models. Using data from China's private equity market from 1993 to 2017, we found that driving forces, resistant forces, and network structure play significant roles in determining resource flows between PE firms. Specifically, driving forces indicate that managers moving from domestic and foreign PE firms to state-owned PE firms are more likely to induce syndications. Furthermore, if the manager is promoted when changing jobs, mobility is likely to enhance the flow of resources. Resistant forces indicate that increased geographical distance reduces syndications. As for the influence of structure, if managers leave PE firms with higher status, they are more likely to induce syndications. This study contributes to the coupling network literature by providing a clarified three-factor framework. By exploring the characteristic of managers in state-owned private equity firms, we specified the syndication theory in China. This study can help private equity firms hire valuable managers and expand syndication networks in practice. © 2020 Tsinghua University Press.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 167
页数:17
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Lerner J., The syndication of venture capital investments, Financial Manag., 23, 3, pp. 16-27, (1994)
[2]  
Wilson R., The theory of syndicates, Econometrica, 36, 1, pp. 119-132, (1968)
[3]  
Beckman C.M., Haunschild P.R., Phillips D.J., Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection, Organ. Sci., 15, 3, pp. 259-275, (2004)
[4]  
Vanacker T., Forbes D.P., Knockaert M., Manigart S., Signal strength, media attention, and resource mobilization: Evidence from new private equity firms, Acad. Manag. J., 63, 4, pp. 1082-1105, (2020)
[5]  
Gulati R., Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation, Strat. Mgmt. J., 20, 5, pp. 397-420, (1999)
[6]  
Hochberg Y.V., Ljungqvist A., Lu Y., Networking as a barrier to entry and the competitive supply of venture capital, J. Finance, 65, 3, pp. 829-859, (2010)
[7]  
Bottazzi L., Da Rin M., Hellmann T., Who are the active investors? Evidence from venture capital, J. Financial Econ., 89, 3, pp. 488-512, (2008)
[8]  
Wu J., Li H., Liu L., Xu Y., Prior ties, investor role, and venture capital syndication, Small Bus. Econ., 56, 4, pp. 1449-1459, (2021)
[9]  
Casamatta C., Haritchabalet C., Experience, screening and syndication in venture capital investments, J. Financial Intermediation, 16, 3, pp. 368-398, (2007)
[10]  
Zhang L., Guler I., How to join the club: Patterns of embeddedness and the addition of new members to interorganizational collaborations, Adm. Sci. Q., 65, 1, pp. 112-150, (2019)