共 50 条
Identifying parkinsonism in mild cognitive impairment
被引:3
|作者:
Fernando, Rishira
[1
]
Thomas, Alan J.
[1
]
Hamilton, Calum A.
[1
]
Durcan, Rory
[1
]
Barker, Sally
[1
]
Ciafone, Joanna
[1
]
Barnett, Nicola
[1
]
Olsen, Kirsty
[1
]
Firbank, Michael
[1
]
Roberts, Gemma
[1
,2
]
Lloyd, Jim
[2
]
Petrides, George
[2
]
Colloby, Sean
[1
]
Allan, Louise M.
[3
]
McKeith, Ian G.
[1
]
O'Brien, John T.
[4
]
Taylor, John-Paul
[1
]
Donaghy, Paul C.
[1
,5
]
机构:
[1] Newcastle Univ, Translat & Clin Res Inst, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[2] Newcastle Upon Tyne Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Nucl Med Dept, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[3] Univ Exeter, Ctr Res Ageing & Cognit Hlth, Exeter, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, Dept Psychiat, Cambridge, England
[5] Newcastle Univ, Translat & Clin Res Inst, Level 3 Biomed Res Bldg,Campus Ageing & Vital, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE4 5PL, England
关键词:
Dementia with Lewy bodies;
Alzheimer's disease;
Mild cognitive impairment;
Parkinsonism;
Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale;
DEMENTIA;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jns.2024.122941
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Introduction: Clinical parkinsonism is a core diagnostic feature for mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI -LB) but can be challenging to identify. A five -item scale derived from the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) has been recommended for the assessment of parkinsonism in dementia. This study aimed to determine whether the five -item scale is effective to identify parkinsonism in MCI. Methods: Participants with MCI from two cohorts (n = 146) had a physical examination including the UPDRS and [123I]-FP-CIT SPECT striatal dopaminergic imaging. Participants were classified as having clinical parkinsonism (P+) or no parkinsonism (P-), and with abnormal striatal dopaminergic imaging (D+) or normal imaging (D-). The five -item scale was the sum of UPDRS tremor at rest, bradykinesia, action tremor, facial expression, and rigidity scores. The ability of the scale to differentiate P+D+ and P -D- participants was examined. Results: The five -item scale had an AUROC of 0.92 in Cohort 1, but the 7/8 cut-off defined for dementia had low sensitivity to identify P+D+ participants (sensitivity 25%, specificity 100%). Optimal sensitivity and specificity was obtained at a 3/4 cut-off (sensitivity 83%, specificity 88%). In Cohort 2, the five -item scale had an AUROC of 0.97, and the 3/4 cut-off derived from Cohort 1 showed sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 82% to differentiate P+D+ from P -D- participants. The five -item scale was not effective in differentiating D+ from D- participants. Conclusions: The five -item scale is effective to identify parkinsonism in MCI, but a lower threshold must be used in MCI compared with dementia.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文