Early elastic and viscoelastic corneal biomechanical changes after photorefractive keratectomy and small incision lenticule extraction

被引:1
作者
Sedaghat, Mohammad-Reza [1 ]
Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed [2 ]
Yekta, Abbas-Ali [3 ]
Maddah, Nasim [3 ]
Roberts, Cynthia J. [4 ,5 ]
Savardashtaki, Maryam [3 ]
机构
[1] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Eye Res Ctr, Mashhad, Iran
[2] Zahedan Univ Med Sci, Rehabil Sci Res Ctr, Zahedan, Iran
[3] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Sch Paramed Sci, Dept Optometry, Mashhad, Iran
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Columbus, OH USA
[5] Ohio State Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Columbus, OH USA
关键词
Corneal biomechanics; Corvis ST; ORA; Refractive surgery; SMILE; PRK; EXTENSIOMETRY EX-VIVO; LASER-ASSISTED LASIK; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; SMILE; PRK;
D O I
10.1007/s10792-024-03169-8
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To compare early changes in the corneal biomechanical parameters after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and their correlations with corneal shape parameters. Methods One hundred twenty four eyes received myopic PRK and SMILE for similar amounts of myopia. Corneal tomography with Pentacam HR, biomechanical parameters using Corvis ST, and Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) were evaluated before and 2 weeks after surgery. The change in each parameter was compared between groups, while the difference in central corneal thickness and cornea-compensated intraocular pressure measured before and after surgery were considered as covariates. Results A significant reduction was seen in the corneal stiffness parameter at first applanation, and an increase in deformation amplitude ratio (DAR), and integrated inverse radius (IIR) in both groups after surgery (p < 0.001) Changes in DAR, and IIR were significantly greater in the SMILE than in the PRK group (p < 0.001) Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) decreased in both SMILE and PRK groups after surgery, (p < 0.001) with no statistically significant difference between groups (p > 0.05) Among new Corvis ST parameters, DAR showed a significant correlation with changes in Ambrosio relational thickness in both groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions Both techniques caused significant changes in corneal biomechanics in the early postoperative period, with greater elastic changes in the SMILE group compared to the PRK group, likely due to lower tension in the SMILE cap and thinner residual stromal bed in SMILE. There were no differences in viscoelastic changes between them, so the lower CH may reflect the volume of tissue removed.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Al-Nashar HY., 2017, Delta J Ophthalmol, V18, P1, DOI DOI 10.4103/1110-9173.201624
  • [2] Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK): study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority trial
    Ang, Marcus
    Tan, Donald
    Mehta, Jodhbir S.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2012, 13
  • [3] Comparison of biomechanical effects of small incision lenticule extraction and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis
    Chen, Minjie
    Yu, Manrong
    Dai, Jinhui
    [J]. ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2016, 94 (07) : E586 - E591
  • [4] Review of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Following LASIK and SMILE for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism
    Damgaard, Iben Bach
    Reffat, Mohamed
    Hjortdal, Jesper
    [J]. OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 12 : 164 - 174
  • [5] Corneal biomechanics after laser refractive surgery: Unmasking differences between techniques
    Fernandez, Joaquin
    Rodriguez-Vallejo, Manuel
    Martinez, Javier
    Tauste, Ana
    Pinero, David P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 44 (03) : 390 - 398
  • [6] New parameters for evaluating corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure after small-incision lenticule extraction an by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry
    Fernandez, Joaquin
    Rodriguez-Vallejo, Manuel
    Martinez, Javier
    Tauste, Ana
    Salvestrini, Patrizia
    Pinero, David P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 43 (06) : 803 - 811
  • [7] Corneal Thickness After SMILE Affects Scheimpflug-based Dynamic Tonometry
    Fernandez, Joaquin
    Rodriguez-Vallejo, Manuel
    Martinez, Javier
    Tauste, Ana
    Pinero, David P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 32 (12) : 821 - +
  • [8] Refractive lenticule extraction small incision lenticule extraction: A new refractive surgery paradigm
    Ganesh, Sri
    Brar, Sheetal
    Arra, Raghavender Reddy
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 66 (01) : 10 - 19
  • [9] Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE, Femtosecond-Assisted LASIK, and Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Matched Comparison Study
    Hashemi, Hassan
    Roberts, Cynthia J.
    Elsheikh, Ahmed
    Mehravaran, Shiva
    Panahi, Parsa
    Asgari, Soheila
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 12 (03):
  • [10] Examination of ocular biomechanics with a new Scheimpflug technology after corneal refractive surgery
    Hassan, Ziad
    Modis, Laszlo, Jr.
    Szalai, Eszter
    Berta, Andras
    Nemeth, Gabor
    [J]. CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2014, 37 (05) : 337 - 341