Incremental dynamic analysis method based on force analogy method

被引：0
作者：
Hao R. [1 ]
Yang Z. [1 ]
Li G. [2 ]
Yu D. [2 ]
Jia S. [2 ]
机构：
[1] College of Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Science & Technology, Baotou
[2] State Key Laboratory of Costal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian
来源：
Zhendong yu Chongji/Journal of Vibration and Shock | 2019年 / 38卷 / 04期
关键词：
Computational efficiency; Force analogy method(FAM); Incremental dynamic analysis(IDA); Specific stiffness matrix; Time complexity;
D O I：
10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2019.04.027
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) method is an effective method to evaluate the seismic performance of structures, but it needs a large number of nonlinear dynamic time history analysis, which requires a large amount of calculation work and time consuming, especially for large and complex structures. An incremental dynamic analysis method based on pseudo-force method (FAM) was proposed in this paper. By introducing additional fictitious loads, the global stiffness matrix of the IDA equation of motion was kept unchanged all the time when the equation of motion was solved nonlinearly. Under the excitation of multiple amplitude-modulated ground motions, by storing and calling the specific stiffness matrix, the reuse of the whole stiffness matrix in the whole process of IDA analysis was realized, and then the calculation efficiency was improved. The time complexity evaluation method was used to quantitatively compare the calculation efficiency of this method with that of the traditional IDA method. The calculation results and time complexity of the two methods were compared through the IDA analysis of the 8-story reinforced concrete frame structure. The accuracy and efficiency of the method were verified. © 2019, Editorial Office of Journal of Vibration and Shock. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：175 / 183and190
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Bertero V.V., Strength and deformation capacities of buildings under extreme environments, Structural Engineering and Structural Mechanics, (1977)
  • [2] Vamvatsikos D., Cornell C.A., Incremental dynamic analysis, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31, 3, pp. 491-514, (2002)
  • [3] Liang D., Liang X., A simplified method for collapse-resistant performance evaluation of RC frame structures, Engineering Mechanics, 34, 2, pp. 102-110, (2017)
  • [4] Vamvatsikos D., Cornell C.A., Direct estimation of seismic demand and capacity of multi-degree of freedom systems through incremental dynamic analysis of single-degree-of-freedom approximation, Journal of Structural Engineering(ASCE), 131, 4, pp. 589-599, (2005)
  • [5] Mofid S., Zarfam P., Raeisi Fard B., On the modal incremental dynamic analysis, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 14, 4, pp. 315-329, (2005)
  • [6] Han S.W., Chopra A.K., Approximate incremental dynamic analysis using the modal pushover analysis procedure, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35, pp. 1853-1873, (2006)
  • [7] Vejani-Noghreiyan H.R., Shooshtari A., Comparison of exact IDA and approximate MPA-based IDA for reinforced concrete frames, The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, (2008)
  • [8] Li N., Zhai C., Xie L., Simplified increment dynamic analysis method for uniaxial plan-asymmentric structures, Engineering Mechanics, 28, 5, pp. 8-12, (2011)
  • [9] Wang M., Wang Z., Liu F., Improved method for incremental dynamic analysis and its application, Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 32, 1, pp. 30-35, (2012)
  • [10] Lu D., Yu X., Wang G., Single-record random incremental dynamic analysis, Engineering Mechanics, 27, pp. 53-58, (2010)
123