Implementation of a group- based lifestyle intervention programme (Healthy Heart) in general practices in The Netherlands: a mixed-methods study

被引:0
作者
Smit, Anne K. [1 ]
Vos, Rimke C. [1 ]
Bijl, Rozemarijn W. [1 ]
Busch, Karin J. G. [2 ]
Verkleij, Sanne M. [1 ]
Kiefte-de Jong, Jessica C. [1 ]
Numans, Mattijs E. [1 ]
Bonten, Tobias N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care V0P, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Primary Care Grp Hague Hadoks, The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
mixed methods; general practice; lifestyle intervention programme; life style; implementation; group-based intervention; cardiovascular diseases; EXPERIENCES; REDUCTION; OBESITY;
D O I
10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0064
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Lifestyle intervention programmes target behavioural risk factors that contribute to cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Unfortunately, sustainable implementation of these programmes can be challenging. Gaining insights into the barriers and facilitators for successful implementation is important for maximising public health impact of these interventions. The Healthy Heart (HH) programme is an example of a combined lifestyle intervention programme. Aim: To analyse the reach, adoption, and implementation of the HH programme. Design & setting: A mixed- methods study conducted in a general practice setting in The Netherlands. Method: Quantitative data were collected from the Healthy Heart study (HH study), a non-randomised cluster stepped- wedge trial to assess the effect of the HH programme on patients at high risk of developing CVDs at practice level. Qualitative data were obtained through focus groups. Results: Out of 73 approached general practices, 55 implemented the HH programme. A total of 1082 patients agreed to participate in the HH study, of whom 64 patients were referred to the HH programme and 41 patients participated. Several barriers for participation were identified such as time investment, lack of risk perception, and being confident in changing lifestyle on their own. Important barriers for healthcare providers (HCPs) to refer a patient were time investment, lack of information to sufficiently inform patients, and preconceived notions regarding which patients the programme was suitable for. Conclusion: This study has offered insights from a patient and HCP perspective regarding barriers and facilitators for implementation of the group- based lifestyle intervention programme. The identified barriers and facilitators, and the suggested improvements, can be used by others who wish to implement a similar programme.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluating the REP-S brief resilience intervention for students in higher education: a multi-study mixed-methods programme of research
    Robinson, Oliver C.
    Sebah, Ilham
    McNay, Ian
    Field, Jennifer
    Wragg, Jane
    Stevenson, Mandy
    Newton, Paul
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE & COUNSELLING, 2021, 49 (05) : 672 - 688
  • [42] Strengthening nursing role and functions in stroke rehabilitation 24/7: A mixed-methods study assessing the feasibility and acceptability of an educational intervention programme
    Loft, Mia Ingerslev
    Poulsen, Ingrid
    Martinsen, Bente
    Mathiesen, Lone Lunbak
    Iversen, Helle Klingenberg
    Esbensen, Bente Appel
    NURSING OPEN, 2019, 6 (01): : 162 - 174
  • [43] Adaption and pilot implementation of an autism executive functioning intervention in children's mental health services: a mixed-methods study protocol
    Dickson, Kelsey S.
    Aarons, Gregory A.
    Anthony, Laura Gutermuth
    Kenworthy, Lauren
    Crandal, Brent R.
    Williams, Katherine
    Brookman-Frazee, Lauren
    PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [44] Impact of a "Diagonal" Intervention on Uptake of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services by Female Sex Workers in Mozambique: A Mixed-Methods Implementation Study
    Lafort, Yves
    Lessitala, Faustino
    de Melo, Malica Sofia Ismael
    Griffin, Sally
    Chersich, Matthew
    Delva, Wim
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 6
  • [45] Investigating the implementation of a novel approach to alcohol screening and brief intervention in Mexico: a mixed-methods study using pseudo-patients
    Fisher, Deborah A.
    Grube, Joel W.
    Lilliott-Gonzalez, Liz
    Elias, Marissa
    Sturm, Robert
    Ringwalt, Christopher L.
    Miller, Ted R.
    Vargas, Elena Cardenas
    Achoki, Tom
    Rizzo, Angela
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 12
  • [46] Adaption and pilot implementation of an autism executive functioning intervention in children’s mental health services: a mixed-methods study protocol
    Kelsey S. Dickson
    Gregory A. Aarons
    Laura Gutermuth Anthony
    Lauren Kenworthy
    Brent R. Crandal
    Katherine Williams
    Lauren Brookman-Frazee
    Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 6
  • [47] Understanding a community's needs for an emergency department-based childhood injury prevention programme: a mixed-methods study
    Yusuf, Hamzah Majid
    Rosenthal, Efrat
    Kornblith, Aaron
    Sowar, Christine
    Del Toro, Rigoberto
    Chen, Carol C.
    INJURY PREVENTION, 2024, 30 (03) : 200 - 205
  • [48] The mismatch between observational measures and residents' perspectives on the retail food environment: a mixed-methods approach in the Heart Healthy Hoods study
    Diez, Julia
    Valiente, Roberto
    Ramos, Carmen
    Garcia, Reyes
    Gittelsohn, Joel
    Franco, Manuel
    PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2017, 20 (16) : 2970 - 2979
  • [49] Acceptability of a complex team-based quality improvement intervention for transient ischemic attack: a mixed-methods study
    Damush, Teresa M.
    Penney, Lauren S.
    Miech, Edward J.
    Rattray, Nicholas A.
    Baird, Sean A.
    Cheatham, Ariel J.
    Austin, Charles
    Sexson, Ali
    Myers, Laura J.
    Bravata, Dawn M.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [50] Challenges in implementation of molecular classification in early stage endometrial cancer-An NRG Oncology cooperative group mixed-methods study
    Wilson, Elise M.
    Huang, Ruizhi
    Jones, Kristen D.
    Hagemann, Ian S.
    Temkin, Sarah M.
    Mcalpine, Jessica N.
    Powell, Matthew A.
    Kepper, Maura M.
    Hagemann, Andrea R.
    CANCER, 2025, 131 (01)