Implementation of a group- based lifestyle intervention programme (Healthy Heart) in general practices in The Netherlands: a mixed-methods study

被引:0
|
作者
Smit, Anne K. [1 ]
Vos, Rimke C. [1 ]
Bijl, Rozemarijn W. [1 ]
Busch, Karin J. G. [2 ]
Verkleij, Sanne M. [1 ]
Kiefte-de Jong, Jessica C. [1 ]
Numans, Mattijs E. [1 ]
Bonten, Tobias N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care V0P, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Primary Care Grp Hague Hadoks, The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
mixed methods; general practice; lifestyle intervention programme; life style; implementation; group-based intervention; cardiovascular diseases; EXPERIENCES; REDUCTION; OBESITY;
D O I
10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0064
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Lifestyle intervention programmes target behavioural risk factors that contribute to cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Unfortunately, sustainable implementation of these programmes can be challenging. Gaining insights into the barriers and facilitators for successful implementation is important for maximising public health impact of these interventions. The Healthy Heart (HH) programme is an example of a combined lifestyle intervention programme. Aim: To analyse the reach, adoption, and implementation of the HH programme. Design & setting: A mixed- methods study conducted in a general practice setting in The Netherlands. Method: Quantitative data were collected from the Healthy Heart study (HH study), a non-randomised cluster stepped- wedge trial to assess the effect of the HH programme on patients at high risk of developing CVDs at practice level. Qualitative data were obtained through focus groups. Results: Out of 73 approached general practices, 55 implemented the HH programme. A total of 1082 patients agreed to participate in the HH study, of whom 64 patients were referred to the HH programme and 41 patients participated. Several barriers for participation were identified such as time investment, lack of risk perception, and being confident in changing lifestyle on their own. Important barriers for healthcare providers (HCPs) to refer a patient were time investment, lack of information to sufficiently inform patients, and preconceived notions regarding which patients the programme was suitable for. Conclusion: This study has offered insights from a patient and HCP perspective regarding barriers and facilitators for implementation of the group- based lifestyle intervention programme. The identified barriers and facilitators, and the suggested improvements, can be used by others who wish to implement a similar programme.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The coaching on lifestyle (CooL) intervention for obesity, a study protocol for an action-oriented mixed-methods study
    Celeste E. van Rinsum
    Sanne M. P. L. Gerards
    Geert M. Rutten
    Ien A. M. van de Goor
    Stef P. J. Kremers
    BMC Public Health, 18
  • [2] The coaching on lifestyle (CooL) intervention for obesity, a study protocol for an action-oriented mixed-methods study
    van Rinsum, Celeste E.
    Gerards, Sanne M. P. L.
    Rutten, Geert M.
    van de Goor, Ien A. M.
    Kremers, Stef P. J.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 18
  • [3] Scaling a group intervention to promote caregiver mental health in Uttarakhand, India: A mixed-methods implementation study
    Agarwal, Disha
    Bailie, Christopher R.
    Rana, Samson
    Balan, Laxman
    Grills, Nathan J.
    Mathias, Kaaren
    CAMBRIDGE PRISMS-GLOBAL MENTAL HEALTH, 2023, 10
  • [4] Electronic reminders to facilitate longitudinal care: a mixed-methods study in general practices
    Kersting, Christine
    Weltermann, Birgitta
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2016, 16 : 1 - 9
  • [5] The South Asian Healthy Lifestyle Intervention (SAHELI) trial: Protocol for a mixed-methods, hybrid effectiveness implementation trial for reducing cardiovascular risk in South Asians in the United States
    Kandula, Namratha R.
    Bernard, Veronica
    Dave, Swapna
    Ehrlich-Jones, Linda
    Counard, Catherine
    Shah, Nirav
    Kumar, Santosh
    Rao, Goutham
    Ackermann, Ronald
    Spring, Bonnie
    Siddique, Juned
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2020, 92
  • [6] Mixed-methods evaluation of a multifaceted heart failure intervention in general practice: the OSCAR-HF pilot study
    Smeets, Miek
    Raat, Willem
    Aertgeerts, Bert
    Penders, Joris
    Vercammen, Jan
    Droogne, Walter
    Mullens, Wilfried
    Janssens, Stefan
    Vaes, Bert
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2023, 10 (02): : 907 - 916
  • [7] Electronic reminders to facilitate longitudinal care: a mixed-methods study in general practices
    Christine Kersting
    Birgitta Weltermann
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 16
  • [8] Effects of a School Based Intervention on Children's Physical Activity and Healthy Eating: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Khan, Matluba
    Bell, Ruth
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (22)
  • [9] Group-based music intervention in Parkinson's disease - findings from a mixed-methods study
    Pohl, Petra
    Wressle, Ewa
    Lundin, Fredrik
    Enthoven, Paul
    Dizdar, Nil
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2020, 34 (04) : 533 - 544
  • [10] A Mixed-Methods Study of Early Intervention System Policy, Supervisory Review Practices, and Effectiveness
    Gullion, Christi L.
    Ingram, Jason R.
    JUSTICE QUARTERLY, 2024, : 815 - 844