Lymphovenous Coupler-Assisted Bypass for Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction

被引:1
|
作者
Spoer, Daisy L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Berger, Lauren E. [1 ,4 ]
Towfighi, Parhom N. [5 ]
Deldar, Romina [1 ]
Gupta, Nisha [2 ]
Huffman, Samuel S. [1 ,2 ]
Sharif-Askary, Banafsheh [1 ]
Fan, Kenneth L. [1 ]
Parikh, Rajiv P. [4 ]
Tom, Laura K. [4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] MedStar Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Washington, DC USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Washington, DC USA
[3] MedStar Washington Hosp Ctr, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Washington, DC USA
[4] Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Plast & Reconstruct Surg Div, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Mercy Hosp, Dept Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] MedStar Washington Hosp Ctr, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 106 Irving St NW, Washington, DC 20010 USA
关键词
breast; breast cancer-related lymphedema; prophylactic; anastomosis; outcomes; PREVENTIVE HEALING APPROACH; CANCER-RELATED LYMPHEDEMA; BREAST-CANCER; SURGICAL PREVENTION; ANASTOMOSIS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1055/a-2181-7559
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Breast cancer-related lymphedema is the most common cause of lymphedema in the United States and occurs in up to 50% of individuals receiving axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Lymphovenous bypass (LVB) at the time of ALND may prevent lymphedema, but long-term results and anastomotic patency are unclear. This study evaluates the feasibility and outcomes of performing immediate lymphatic reconstruction via coupler-assisted bypass (CAB). Methods This is a retrospective review of all patients undergoing prophylactic LVB following ALND at two tertiary care centers between 2018 and 2022. Patients were divided into cohorts based on whether they received the "standard" end-to-end (E-E) suturing or CAB technique. The primary outcome of interest was development of lymphedema. Quantitative and qualitative assessments for lymphedema were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Results Overall, 63 LVBs were performed, of which 24 lymphatics underwent immediate reconstruction via "CAB" and 39 lymphatics via "standard" end-to-end suture. Patient characteristics, including body mass index, and treatment characteristics, including radiation therapy, did not significantly differ between groups. CAB was associated with a greater mean number of lymphatics bypassed per vein (standard 1.7 vs. CAB 2.6, p = 0.0001) and bypass to larger veins (standard 1.2 vs. CAB 2.2 mm, p < 0.0001). At a median follow-up of 14.7 months, 9.1% (1/11) of individuals receiving CAB developed lymphedema. These rates were similar to those seen following standard bypass at 4.8% (1/21), although within a significantly shorter follow-up duration (standard 7.8 vs. CAB 14.7 months, p = 0.0170). Conclusion The CAB technique is a viable, effective technical alternative to the standard LVB technique. This comparative study of techniques in prophylactic LVB suggests that CABs maintain long-term patency, possibly due to the ease of anastomosing several lymphatics to single large caliber veins while reducing the technical demands of the procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 347
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lymphovenous Bypass for Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Axillary Lymph Node Dissection: Minimizing the Risk of Upper Extremity Lymphedema
    Medor, Maria C.
    Churchill, Isabella F.
    Pereira, Diego
    Roberts, Amanda
    Cordeiro, Erin
    Findlay-Shirras, Lisa
    Zhang, Jing
    Momtazi, Moein
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2024, 40 (09) : 713 - 721
  • [2] Coupler-Assisted Controlled-Phase Gate with Enhanced Adiabaticity
    Chu, Ji
    Yan, Fei
    PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED, 2021, 16 (05)
  • [3] Immediate lymphatic reconstruction
    Johnson, Anna Rose
    Singhal, Dhruv
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 118 (05) : 750 - 757
  • [4] Lymphaticovenous Bypass for Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction in Locoregional Advanced Melanoma Patients
    Cakmakoglu, Cagri
    Kwiecien, Grzegorz J.
    Schwarz, Graham S.
    Gastman, Brian
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2020, 36 (04) : 247 - 252
  • [5] Economic Comparison of Hand-Sutured and Coupler-Assisted Microvascular Anastomoses
    Head, Linden K.
    McKay, Douglas R.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2018, 34 (01) : 71 - 76
  • [6] Robotic-assisted Lymphovenous Anastomosis of the Central Lymphatic System
    Gruenherz, Lisanne
    Weinzierl, Andrea
    Gutschow, Christian Alexander
    Puippe, Gilbert Dominique
    Gnannt, Ralph
    von Reibnitz, Donata
    Gousopoulos, Epameinondas
    Barbon, Carlotta
    Giovanoli, Pietro
    Pieper, Claus Christian
    Lindenblatt, Nicole
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2024, 12 (09)
  • [7] Immediate lymphatic reconstruction: an overview
    Huang, Anne
    Tan, Mark C.
    Garza, Rebecca M.
    Beederman, Maureen
    ANNALS OF BREAST SURGERY, 2024, 8
  • [8] Trends in Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction
    Fan, Betty
    Ahmed, Shahnur
    Hasssanein, Aladdin
    Lester, Mary
    Manghelli, Joshua
    Fisher, Carla
    Imeokparia, Folasade
    Ludwig, Kandice
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (SUPPL 2) : S456 - S457
  • [9] Trends in Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction
    Ahmed, Shahnur
    Hassanein, Aladdin H.
    Lester, Mary E.
    Manghelli, Joshua
    Fisher, Carla
    Imeokparia, Folosade
    Ludwig, Kandice
    Fan, Betty
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [10] Coupler-Assisted Leakage Reduction for Scalable Quantum Error Correction with Superconducting Qubits
    Yang, Xiaohan
    Chu, Ji
    Guo, Zechen
    Huang, Wenhui
    Liang, Yongqi
    Liu, Jiawei
    Qiu, Jiawei
    Sun, Xuandong
    Tao, Ziyu
    Zhang, Jiawei
    Zhang, Jiajian
    Zhang, Libo
    Zhou, Yuxuan
    Guo, Weijie
    Hu, Ling
    Jiang, Ji
    Liu, Yang
    Linpeng, Xiayu
    Chen, Tingyong
    Chen, Yuanzhen
    Niu, Jingjing
    Liu, Song
    Zhong, Youpeng
    Yu, Dapeng
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2024, 133 (17)