The importance of seeking feedback for benefiting from feedback: A case of second language writing

被引:7
作者
Papi, Mostafa [1 ]
Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi [2 ]
Sato, Masatoshi [3 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Sch Teacher Educ, G129 Stone Bldg,1114 W Call St, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Univ Nevada, Dept English, Reno, NV USA
[3] Univ Andres Bello, Dept English, Santiago, Chile
关键词
feedback monitoring; feedback-seeking behaviors; learner agency; learner engagement; second language writing; written corrective feedback; WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; ERROR-CORRECTION; SELF-REGULATION; ACCURACY; LEARNERS; ENGAGEMENT; PROFICIENCY; MINDSETS; REVISION;
D O I
10.1111/modl.12923
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study explored the role of feedback-seeking behaviors (FSB) in how English-as-a-second language (ESL) learners benefit from written corrective feedback (WCF). Seventy-six learners enrolled in an ESL writing course at a major university in the United States completed an FSB questionnaire, wrote a narrative essay, received WCF on their essays, and were given the opportunity to seek further feedback while revising their essays. Five writing measures were used to assess the quality of the revised essays and code the WCF provided. Paired-samples t-tests showed that the students made statistically significant improvements in all but one (content) of the target measures. Multiple regression analyses showed that WCF predicted improvements in only one measure (language use), whereas the learners' feedback monitoring (an implicit feedback-seeking strategy involving attending to, processing, and using feedback) predicted the organization, vocabulary, language use, mechanics, as well as the overall quality of the students' revisions. The results suggest that students benefit from WCF only if they seek, process, and use it. These findings confirmed the importance of feedback monitoring in how students benefit from WCF and support a learner-centered perspective that views students as proactive agents in the feedback process. Theoretical and pedagogical implications are discussed. image
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 512
页数:24
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
ASHFORD SJ, 1986, ACAD MANAGE J, V29, P465, DOI 10.5465/256219
[2]   SELF-REGULATION FOR MANAGERIAL EFFECTIVENESS - THE ROLE OF ACTIVE FEEDBACK SEEKING [J].
ASHFORD, SJ ;
TSUI, AS .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1991, 34 (02) :251-280
[3]   Towards a cross-linguistic pedagogy Biliteracy and reciprocal learning strategies in French immersion [J].
Ballinger, Susan .
JOURNAL OF IMMERSION AND CONTENT-BASED LANGUAGE EDUCATION, 2013, 1 (01) :131-148
[4]   Effects of written corrective feedback and language aptitude on verb tense accuracy [J].
Benson, Susan ;
DeKeyser, Robert .
LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 2019, 23 (06) :702-726
[5]  
Berman R.A., 2013, Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study
[6]  
Bitchener J., 2012, Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing
[7]   The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students [J].
Bitchener, John ;
Knoch, Ute .
LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 2008, 12 (03) :409-431
[8]  
Bitchener J, 2016, ITL-INT J APPL LING, V167, P111, DOI [10.1075/itl.167.2.01bit, 10.1075/itl.167.2.bit, DOI 10.1075/ITL.167.2.BIT]
[9]   The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month Investigation [J].
Bitchener, John ;
Knoch, Ute .
APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2010, 31 (02) :193-214
[10]  
Bondarenko A.V., 2020, Self-Efficacy as a generative mechanism for future self-guides and feedback-seeking behavior in language learning