Human reliability analysis methods

被引：0

作者：

Yalcin, Esra ^{[1
]}

Altun Ciftcioglu, Gokcen ^{[2
]}

Guzel, Burcin ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Istanbul Gelisim Univ, Istanbul Gelisim Vocat Sch, Dept Occupat Hlth & Safety, Istanbul, Turkiye

[2] Marmara Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Istanbul, Turkiye

[3] Minist Labour & Social Secur, Ankara, Turkiye

来源：

PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI | 2024年 / 30卷 / 02期

关键词：

Human reliability analysis; Human error; Occupational safety and health; Human error probability; Human reliability; HUMAN ERROR PROBABILITIES; EVALUATE HUMAN ERROR; BAYESIAN NETWORK; COGNITIVE RELIABILITY; DATA-COLLECTION; MODIFIED CREAM; HEART METHOD; MARINE; MODEL; OPERATION;

D O I：

10.5505/pajes.2023.33958

中图分类号：

T [工业技术];

学科分类号：

08 ;

摘要：

Human error is one of the most important factors contributing to occupational accidents. Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) methods have been used successfully in many fields to determine the probability of errors contributing to such accidents, estimate the impact of their consequences, and develop error reduction strategies. In this study, it has described some HRA methods and their implementations in several fields, including maritime, aviation, railway, space, health, nuclear, petrochemical, and construction sectors. Examples are drawn from articles dealing with HRA issues listed in the Web of Science Core Collection database between 2012 and 2022. The relatively small number of HRA studies conducted in T & uuml;rkiye are found mainly in maritime applications. This review is intended to encourage the widespread use of HRA methods in all industries.

引用

页码：282 / 292

页数：11

共 50 条

[31] A human reliability analysis for ship to ship LNG bunkering process under D-S evidence fusion HEART approach
Uflaz, Esma
Sezer, Sukru Ilke
Akyuz, Emre
Arslan, Ozcan
Kurt, Rafet Emek
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2022, 80
[32] Uncertainty of human error and fuzzy approach to human reliability analysis
Kim, BJ
Bishu, RR
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2006, 14 (01) : 111 - 129
[33] Inclusion of fatigue effects in human reliability analysis
Griffith, Candice D.
Mahadevan, Sankaran
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2011, 96 (11) : 1437 - 1447
[34] A Review of Cognitive Models in Human Reliability Analysis
Pan, Xing
Lin, Ye
He, Congjiao
QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 33 (07) : 1299 - 1316
[35] Dependency Idioms for Quantitative Human Reliability Analysis
Paglioni, Vincent Philip
Groth, Katrina M.
NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 198 (08) : 1645 - 1667
[36] Integrated design environment for human performance and human reliability analysis
Nelson, WR
GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES OF HUMAN FACTORS IN POWER GENERATION, 1997, : 87 - 811
[37] Dependency definitions for quantitative human reliability analysis
Paglioni, Vincent P.
Groth, Katrina M.
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 220
[38] Tailoring a Human Reliability Analysis to Industry Needs
DeMott, Diana L.
ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM 2016 PROCEEDINGS, 2016,
[39] Human reliability analysis of intelligent mine human-computer interaction based on improved SPAR-H
Yuan, Xiaofang
Jiang, Xin
Shi, Zepeng
Sun, Linhui
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2024, 423
[40] An integrated approach to human reliability analysis - decision analytic dynamic reliability model
Holmberg, J
Hukki, K
Norros, L
Pulkkinen, U
Pyy, P
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1999, 65 (03) : 239 - 250

← 1 2 3 4 5 →