Human reliability analysis methods

被引：0

作者：

Yalcin, Esra ^{[1
]}

Altun Ciftcioglu, Gokcen ^{[2
]}

Guzel, Burcin ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Istanbul Gelisim Univ, Istanbul Gelisim Vocat Sch, Dept Occupat Hlth & Safety, Istanbul, Turkiye

[2] Marmara Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Istanbul, Turkiye

[3] Minist Labour & Social Secur, Ankara, Turkiye

来源：

PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI | 2024年 / 30卷 / 02期

关键词：

Human reliability analysis; Human error; Occupational safety and health; Human error probability; Human reliability; HUMAN ERROR PROBABILITIES; EVALUATE HUMAN ERROR; BAYESIAN NETWORK; COGNITIVE RELIABILITY; DATA-COLLECTION; MODIFIED CREAM; HEART METHOD; MARINE; MODEL; OPERATION;

D O I：

10.5505/pajes.2023.33958

中图分类号：

T [工业技术];

学科分类号：

08 ;

摘要：

Human error is one of the most important factors contributing to occupational accidents. Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) methods have been used successfully in many fields to determine the probability of errors contributing to such accidents, estimate the impact of their consequences, and develop error reduction strategies. In this study, it has described some HRA methods and their implementations in several fields, including maritime, aviation, railway, space, health, nuclear, petrochemical, and construction sectors. Examples are drawn from articles dealing with HRA issues listed in the Web of Science Core Collection database between 2012 and 2022. The relatively small number of HRA studies conducted in T & uuml;rkiye are found mainly in maritime applications. This review is intended to encourage the widespread use of HRA methods in all industries.

引用

页码：282 / 292

页数：11

共 50 条

[11] A critical review of methods and models for evaluating organizational factors in Human Reliability Analysis
Alvarenga, M. A. B.
Frutuoso e Melo, P. F.
Fonseca, R. A.
PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2014, 75 : 25 - 41
[12] A comparison of the quantification aspects of human reliability analysis methods in nuclear power plants
Park, Jooyoung
Arigi, Awwal Mohammed
Kim, Jonghyun
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2019, 133 : 297 - 312
[13] Human reliability analysis in maintenance and repair operations of mining trucks: A Bayesian network approach
Hossein, Ali Reza Zaker
Sayadi, Ahmad Reza
Rahimdel, Mohammad Javad
Moradi, Mohammad Reza
HELIYON, 2024, 10 (14)
[14] A fuzzy and Bayesian network CREAM model for human reliability analysis - The case of tanker shipping
Zhou, Qingji
Wong, Yiik Diew
Loh, Hui Shan
Yuen, Kum Fai
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2018, 105 : 149 - 157
[15] A Human Reliability Analysis to Crankshaft Overhauling in Dry-Docking of a General Cargo Ship
Bicen, Samet
Kandemir, Cagatay
Celik, Metin
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART M-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR THE MARITIME ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 235 (01) : 93 - 109
[16] Use of evidential reasoning for eliciting bayesian subjective probabilities in human reliability analysis: A maritime case
Yang, Zaili
Abujaafar, Khalifa Mohamed
Qu, Zhuohua
Wang, Jin
Nazir, Salman
Wan, Chengpeng
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2019, 186
[17] Integrating Human Barriers in Human Reliability Analysis: A New Model for the Energy Sector
Guglielmi, Dina
Paolucci, Alessio
Cozzani, Valerio
Mariani, Marco Giovanni
Pietrantoni, Luca
Fraboni, Federico
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (05)
[18] Performance shaping factors in the human error probability modification of human reliability analysis
Pan, Xing
Wu, Zekun
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS, 2020, 26 (03) : 538 - 550
[19] The research of human reliability analysis and human reliability data management system
Gao, WY
Zhang, L
PROGRESS IN SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL III, PTS A AND B, 2002, 3 : 733 - 738
[20] Issues in benchmarking human reliability analysis methods: A literature review
Boring, Ronald L.
Hendrickson, Stacey M. L.
Forester, John A.
Tran, Tuan Q.
Lois, Erasmia
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2010, 95 (06) : 591 - 605

← 1 2 3 4 5 →