Trade-offs and synergies of farmland ecosystem services in Loess Plateau: A case study of Longdong Region, Northwest China

被引:0
作者
Lan Y. [1 ]
Sun T. [1 ]
Li W. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Social Development and Public Administration, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou
来源
Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering | 2023年 / 39卷 / 12期
关键词
ecosystem services; farmland; Longdong Loess Plateau Region; synergies; trade-offs;
D O I
10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202212181
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Trade-off and synergy relationships of farmland ecosystem services is not only important research topic in the agricultural ecosystem but also closely related to cropland protection and food security. However, existing researches lack analysis on trade-off and synergy relationships of farmland ecosystem services in Longdong Loess Plateau, where fragile ecoenvironment (e.g. severe soil erosion, scarce water resources, etc.) seriously threatens cropland resources and land productivity. In order to clarify trade-off and synergy relationships of farmland ecosystem services, Longdong Loess Plateau, one of the birthplaces of Chinese farming civilization, was selected as the study area, and six ecosystem service models, including precipitation storage, universal soil loss equation, and InVEST etc were utilized to calculate the amount of farmland ecosystem services in 2020 based on the socio-economic and resource-environmental data such as the statistical yearbooks, land use/cover, digital elevation models, normalized difference vegetation index, meteorology, soil, net primary productivity, and road POI. Meanwhile, the Pearson correlation coefficient and the bivariate global/local Moran's index were used to distinguish trade-off and synergy relationships between providing services and other services, and identify the spatial heterogeneity of the relationships among services, respectively. The results showed that: 1) The amount of food provision service, water conservation service, carbon sequestration service, soil retention service in 2020 was 4.61×106 t, 2.45×108 m3, 2.94×106 t, 6.61×109 t, respectively, and the mean value of habitat quality service was 0.26. Both providing services and cultural services shared a distribution pattern of “high in the east and west, low in the central and north”, due to the spatial heterogeneity of climate, soil, terrain and socio-economic development planning. By contrast, both adjusting services and supporting services had a "belt-like" distribution. 2) The correlation coefficient between providing services and adjusting services, supporting services, and cultural services was 0.97, 0.85, and 0.97, respectively. And the correlation coefficient between food provision service and water conservation service, carbon sequestration service, soil retention service, habitat quality service, landscape service was 0.94, 0.99, 0.93, 0.82, and 0.97, respectively. All of correlation coefficients showed that all relationships of farmland ecosystem services were synergistic in Longdong Loess Plateau. 3) Trade-off and synergy relationships among four types of services, and among each sub-service of farmland ecosystem had spatial auto-correlation, and significant spatial heterogeneity. Synergy relationships among each sub-service were clustered obviously, appeared mainly in the central and northern Longdong, while trade-off relationships among each sub-service were distributed sporadically. Therefore, it is very significant to maintain multifunctionality of farmland ecosystem in Longdong Loess Plateau, to implement zoning management strategies, to fully exploit synergistic effect of various services of farmland ecosystem, to integrally improve service functions of farmland ecosystem (especially food provision service), and further consolidate the position of "Longdong Grain Warehouse" in the new era. © 2023 Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 244
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
SONG Xiaoqing, OUYANG Zhu, Route of multifunctional cultivated land management in China, Journal of Natural Resources, 27, 4, pp. 540-551, (2012)
[2]  
DAILY G C., Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, (1997)
[3]  
COSTANZA R, ARGE R, GROOT R, Et al., The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature, 387, 6630, pp. 253-260, (1997)
[4]  
BOMMARCO R, VICO G, HALLIN S., Exploiting ecosystem services in agriculture for increased food security, Global Food Security, 17, pp. 57-63, (2018)
[5]  
ZHU Congmou, LI Wuyan, DU Yingying, Et al., Spatial-temporal change, trade-off and synergy relationships of cropland multifunctional value in Zhejiang Province, China, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 36, 14, pp. 263-272, (2020)
[6]  
LI Shuangcheng, ZHANG Caiyu, LIU Jinlong, Et al., The tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services: Research progress, development trend, and themes of geography, Georaphical Research, 32, 8, pp. 1379-1390, (2013)
[7]  
TANG Heng, ZHENG Yu, CHEN Fu, Et al., Ecosystem services valuation of difference croplands and cropping systems in Beijing Suburb, Ecological Economy, 199, 7, pp. 56-59, (2008)
[8]  
XIE Gaodi, XIAO Yu, Review of agro-ecosystem services and their values, Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 21, 6, pp. 645-651, (2013)
[9]  
YUAN Yuan, LIU Jintong, JIN Zhanzhong, An integrated assessment of positive and negative effects of high-yielding cropland ecosystem services in Luancheng County, Hebei Province of North China, Chinese Journal of Ecology, 30, 12, pp. 2809-2814, (2011)
[10]  
YANG You, YANG Ning, ZOU Dongsheng, Farmland ecosystem function service values in Zhangjiajie City, Research of Agricultural Modernization, 36, 1, pp. 132-136, (2015)