Efficiency Evaluation of Forest Carbon Sinks: A Case Study of Russia

被引:6
作者
Vilkov, Arsenii [1 ]
Tian, Gang [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeast Forestry Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Harbin 150040, Peoples R China
关键词
forest carbon sink efficiency; SBM-undesirable output model; Malmquist index; Low-carbon development strategy; forest carbon offset projects; Russia; PROJECTS; OUTPUT;
D O I
10.3390/f15040649
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Forest carbon sinks in Russia are an integral part of the national "Low-carbon development strategy". However, the influence of natural disasters and various land use policies in economic regions (ERs) raises the issue of forest carbon sink efficiency (FCSE). This study adopted a DEA-SBM model that considers undesirable outputs to measure FCSE, and the Malmquist index (MI) approach to analyze total factor productivity (TFP) of forest carbon sinks, using panel data from 2009 to 2021. The results show that the average FCSE was 0.788, with an improvement rate of 21.2%. Scale efficiency is the main factor constraining FCSE in Russia. In twelve ERs, forest carbon sinks are efficient only in the Kaliningrad and West Siberian ERs. In general, forest carbon sinks in Russia are inefficient mainly due to forest fires and other natural disturbances (82.33%); excessive logging activities (38.64%); and lack of carbon absorption capacity (31.70%). The average score of their TFP is 0.970, indicating a decline of 3% over the study period. This is primarily attributed to the decline of 1.6% in technological change. The productivity of forest carbon sinks remained static only in the Kaliningrad ER, while other economic regions performed deterioration trends. Therefore, Russia should enhance the efficiency of forest carbon sinks.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation, 2020, Verification of the Effectiveness of the Organization of Work and Expenditure of Funds for Forest Management Allocated from the Budgets of the Budgetary System of the Russian Federation and Other Sources in 20152019, P40
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change adopted at COP3 in Kyoto, Japan
[3]  
[Anonymous], THE PARIS AGREEMENT
[4]  
[Anonymous], National Inventory Submissions 2022 | UNFCCC
[5]  
Ao G., 2019, J AGR EC MANAG, V18, P656
[6]   SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (09) :1078-1092
[7]  
Banker RD., 1989, Res Gov Nonprofit Acc, V5, P125
[8]   THE ECONOMIC-THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY [J].
CAVES, DW ;
CHRISTENSEN, LR ;
DIEWERT, WE .
ECONOMETRICA, 1982, 50 (06) :1393-1414
[9]  
Center of Forest Ecology and Productivity of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Dynamics of the Total Carbon Stock in the Forests of Russia, t/ha
[10]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444