Land use and land cover dynamics in the Upper Ganga Riverine Wetland: unraveling ecosystem services over two decades

被引:10
作者
Yadav, Alka [1 ]
Kansal, Mitthan Lal [1 ]
Singh, Aparajita [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Roorkee, Dept Water Resources Dev & Management, Roorkee, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol Roorkee, Dept Humanities & Social Sci, Roorkee, India
关键词
Wetland; Ecosystem services value; Land use and land cover; Random forest; Value transfer method; Coefficient of sensitivity; IMPACTS; VALUES; RESTORATION; PROVISION; EXPANSION; FOREST; CARBON; BASIN; AREA;
D O I
10.1007/s10661-024-12748-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Anthropogenic activities have drastically transformed natural landscapes, profoundly impacting land use and land cover (LULC) and, consequently, the provision and functionality of ecosystem service values (ESVs). Evaluating the changes in LULC and their influence on ESVs is imperative to protect ecologically fragile ecosystems from degradation. This study focuses on a highly sensitive Upper Ganga riverine wetland in India, covering Hapur, Amroha, Bulandshahr, and Sambhal districts, which is well-known for its significant endemic flora and fauna. The study analyzes the subtle variability in ecosystem services offered by the various LULC biomes, including riverine wetland, built-up, cropland, forest, sandbar, and unused land. LULC classification is carried out using Landsat satellite imagery 5 and 8 for the years 2000, 2010, and 2020, using the random forest method. The spatiotemporal changing pattern of ESVs is assessed utilizing the value transfer method with two distinct value coefficients: global value coefficients (C14) for a worldwide perspective and modified local value coefficients X08 for a more specific local context. The results show a significant increase in built-up and unused land, with a corresponding decrease in wetlands and forests from 2000 to 2020. The combined ESVs for all the districts are worth US $5072 million (C14) and US $2139 million (X08) in the year 2000, which declined to US $4510 million (C14) and US $1770 million (X08) in the year 2020. The sensitivity analysis reveals that the coefficient of sensitivity (CS) is below one for all biomes, suggesting the robustness of the employed value coefficients in estimating ESVs. Moreover, the analysis identifies cropland, followed by forests and wetlands, as the LULC biomes most responsive to changes. This research provides crucial insights to stakeholders and policymakers for developing sustainable land management practices aimed at enhancing the ecological worth of the Upper Ganga Riverine Wetland.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]   Assessment of spatiotemporal variations of ecosystem service values and hotspots in a dryland: A case-study in Pakistan [J].
Akhtar, Mobeen ;
Zhao, Yuanyuan ;
Gao, Guanglei ;
Gulzar, Qudsia ;
Hussain, Azfar .
LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 33 (09) :1383-1397
[2]   Assessing the impacts of land use/cover changes on ecosystem service values in Rib watershed, Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia [J].
Anley, Melkamu Alebachew ;
Minale, Amare Sewnet ;
Haregewoyn, Nigusse ;
Gashaw, Temesgen .
TREES FORESTS AND PEOPLE, 2022, 7
[3]   Widening the Evaluative Space for Ecosystem Services: A Taxonomy of Plural Values and Valuation Methods [J].
Arias-Arevalo, Paola ;
Gomez-Baggethun, Erik ;
Martin-Lopez, Berta ;
Perez-Rincon, Mario .
ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES, 2018, 27 (01) :29-53
[4]   Assessing changes in the value of ecosystem services in response to land-use/land-cover dynamics in Nigeria [J].
Arowolo, Aisha Olushola ;
Deng, Xiangzheng ;
Olatunji, Olusanya Abiodun ;
Obayelu, Abiodun Elijah .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 636 :597-609
[5]   Spatial dynamics of biophysical trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in the Himalayas [J].
Aryal, Kishor ;
Maraseni, Tek ;
Apan, Armando .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2023, 59
[6]   Criticism onelasticity-sensitivity coefficient for assessing the robustness and sensitivity of ecosystem services values [J].
Aschonitis, V. G. ;
Gaglio, M. ;
Castaldelli, G. ;
Fano, E. A. .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 20 :66-68
[7]   Comparing approaches to spatially explicit ecosystem service modeling: A case study from the San Pedro River, Arizona [J].
Bagstad, Kenneth J. ;
Semmens, Darius J. ;
Winthrop, Robert .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2013, 5 :E40-E50
[8]  
Bhat Parvaiz A., 2017, International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, V6, P513, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.10.003
[9]   Channel dynamics associated with land use/cover change in Ganges river, India, 1989–2010 [J].
Bhunia G.S. ;
Shit P.K. ;
Pal D.K. .
Spatial Information Research, 2016, 24 (04) :437-449
[10]  
Biswas S. P., 2022, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, V77, P521