Improving spatial equity-oriented location-allocation models of urban medical facilities

被引:0
作者
Tao Z. [1 ]
Dai T. [1 ]
Song C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing
来源
Dili Xuebao/Acta Geographica Sinica | 2023年 / 78卷 / 02期
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
accessibility; disparity; equality; location- allocation models; medical facilities; spatial equity;
D O I
10.11821/dlxb202302013
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Rational configuration and spatial equity of urban medical facilities is an important topic in geography. The Maximal Accessibility Equality (MAE) model is an important progress in the field of spatial equity- oriented location- allocation models. However, existing studies have paid less attention to the spatial equity measures in MAE models. Aiming to fill this research gap, this study attempts to clarify the meaning of spatial equity of medical accessibility. Based on a review of existing studies, 10 spatial equity measures are selected for investigation in this study. The MAE mode is extended by incorporating these measures. Using medical facilities in Shenzhen as a case study, these improved models are applied, evaluated and compared. The following findings are drawn: (1) From the perspective of theoretical foundation behind the measures, the Coefficient of Variation (CV), Gini coefficient, Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) and Palma ratio are appropriate for public service spatial equity studies. (2) Based on the performance of models, the improved MAE models incorporating Variance, Standard Deviation, CV, Palma ratio, MAD and Theil index are advantageous. (3) Overall, three measures, including CV, MAD and Palma ratio, are suggested for measuring and optimizing the spatial equity of medical services. Improved MAE models adopting these three measures as objective functions can significantly improve the spatial equity of accessibility to medical services. This study contributes to the literature by improving the spatial equity-oriented location-allocation models. It can provide scientific methods for the spatial planning of public service facilities. © 2023 Science Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:474 / 489
页数:15
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Wang F H., Measurement, optimization and impact of health care accessibility: A methodological review, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102, 5, pp. 1104-1112, (2012)
[2]  
Tong D Q, Murray A T., Spatial optimization in geography, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102, 6, pp. 1290-1309, (2012)
[3]  
Zhan Dongsheng, Zhang Wenzhong, Chen Li, Et al., Research progress and its enlightenment of urban public service facilities allocation, Progress in Geography, 38, 4, pp. 506-519, (2019)
[4]  
Liu H M, Fang C L, Fan Y P., Mapping the inequalities of medical resource provision in China, Regional Studies, Regional Science, 7, 1, pp. 568-570, (2020)
[5]  
Liu Helin, Zheng Tianming, Nie Jingxin, On the spatial allocation of the quantity and diversity of basic urban public service facilities: A case study of Wuhan inner city, City Planning Review, 45, 2, pp. 84-91, (2021)
[6]  
Zhao Lin, Zhang Yushuo, Jiao Xinying, Et al., The spatial pattern and effect of basic public service quality in Henan Province, Scientia Geographica Sinica, 36, 10, pp. 1495-1504, (2016)
[7]  
Han Zenglin, Zhu Jun, Zhong Jingqiu, Et al., Spatio- temporal characteristics and evolution mechanism for the equalization of basic public service in island counties of China, Economic Geography, 41, 2, pp. 11-22, (2021)
[8]  
Yuan Zhenjie, Guo Junwanguo, Yang Yunying, Et al., Analysis of the spatial structure, mechanism and social-political effects of the high-quality basic educational resources in China, Acta Geographica Sinica, 75, 2, pp. 318-331, (2020)
[9]  
Song Xueqian, Deng Wei, Zhou Peng, Et al., Spatial equity and influences of two-level public healthcare resources: A background to hierarchical diagnosis and treatment reform in China, Acta Geographica Sinica, 74, 6, pp. 1178-1189, (2019)
[10]  
Song Zhengna, Chen Wen, Zhang Guixiang, Et al., Spatial accessibility to public service facilities and its measurement approaches, Progress in Geography, 29, 10, pp. 1217-1224, (2010)