Administrative burden for patients in US health care settings Post-Affordable Care Act: A scoping review

被引:4
作者
Ilea, Passion [1 ]
Ilea, Ian [2 ]
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Sch Social Work, 1800 SW 6th Ave, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[2] Portland VA Res Fdn, Ctr Improve Vet Involvement Care, Portland, OR USA
关键词
Administrative burden; Health care utilization; Health systems; Health care policy; CAREGIVERS; INEQUITIES; INVENTORY; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116686
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Administrative burdens are the costs associated with receiving a service or accessing a program. Based on the Herd & Moynihan framework, they occur in three subcategories: learning costs, compliance costs, and psychological costs. Administrative burdens manifest inequitably, more significantly impacting vulnerable populations. Administrative burdens may impact the health of those trying to access services, and in some cases block access to health -promoting services entirely. This scoping review examined studies focused on the impact on patients of administrative burden administrative burden in health care settings in the U.S. following the passage of the Affordable Care Act. We queried databases for empirical literature capturing patient administrative burden, retrieving 1578 records, with 31 articles ultimately eligible for inclusion. Of the 31 included studies, 18 used quantitative methods, nine used qualitative methods, three used mixed methods, and one was a case study. In terms of administrative burden subcategories, most patient outcomes reported were learning (22 studies) and compliance costs (26 studies). Psychological costs were the most rarely reported; all four studies describing psychological costs were qualitative in nature. Only twelve studies connected patient demographic data with administrative burden data, despite previous research suggesting an inequitable burden impact. Additionally, twenty-eight studies assessed administrative burden and only three attempted to reduce it via an intervention, resulting in a lack of data on intervention design and efficacy.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Allen H.L., 2008, Social Work and Social Research Ph. D. Program
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, CLOS GAP GEN HLTH EQ, DOI DOI 10.1080/17441692.2010.514617
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, State Enrollment Experience: Implementing Health Coverage Eligibility and Enrollment Systems under the ACA
[4]  
Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616
[5]   Barriers and facilitators of communication about off periods in Parkinson's disease: Qualitative analysis of patient, carepartner, and physician Interviews [J].
Armstrong, Melissa J. ;
Rastgardani, Tara ;
Gagliardi, Anna R. ;
Marras, Connie .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (04)
[6]   More intelligent designs: Comparing the effectiveness of choice architectures in US health insurance marketplaces [J].
Barnes, Andrew J. ;
Karpman, Michael ;
Long, Sharon K. ;
Hanoch, Yaniv ;
Rice, Thomas .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2021, 163 :142-164
[7]   Health in citizen-state interactions: How physical and mental health problems shape experiences of administrative burden and reduce take-up [J].
Bell, Elizabeth ;
Christensen, Julian ;
Herd, Pamela ;
Moynihan, Donald .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2023, 83 (02) :385-400
[8]   Inequities in health care: A five-country survey [J].
Blendon, RJ ;
Schoen, C ;
DesRoches, CM ;
Osborn, R ;
Scoles, KL ;
Zapert, K .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2002, 21 (03) :182-191
[9]  
Bozeman B., 2000, BUREAUCRACY RED TAPE
[10]   The ontology, origin, and impact of divisive public sector rules: A meta-narrative review of the red tape and administrative burden literatures [J].
Campbell, Jesse W. ;
Pandey, Sanjay K. ;
Arnesen, Lars .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2023, 83 (02) :296-315