A comparative life cycle assessment of electro-anaerobic digestion to evaluate biomethane generation from organic solid waste

被引:9
作者
Wang, Chao [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Dong [1 ,2 ]
Xia, Ao [1 ,2 ]
Nizami, Abdul-Sattar [3 ]
Huang, Yun [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Xianqing [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Xun [1 ,2 ]
Liao, Qiang [1 ,2 ]
Murphy, Jerry D. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Key Lab Low grade Energy Utilizat Technol & Syst, Key Lab Low Grade Energy Utilizat Technol & Syst, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Inst Engn Thermophys, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[3] Govt Coll Univ, Sustainable Dev Study Ctr, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
[4] Univ Coll Cork, Environm Res Inst, MaREI Ctr, Cork, Ireland
[5] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Engn & Architecture, Civil Struct & Environm Engn, Cork, Ireland
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Organic solid waste; Electro-anaerobic digestion; Biomethane; Life cycle assessment; Bioenergy; Carbon footprint; FOOD WASTE; METHANE EMISSIONS; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; BIOGAS; ENERGY; FERMENTATION; STRAW; PRETREATMENT; MICROALGAE; CONVERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2024.114347
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Anaerobic digestion is a mature technology, but its application may be constrained by suboptimal feedstock conversion efficiency and associated low biogas production. Electro-anaerobic digestion has been proposed as an innovative technology to boost biogas production performance. This study is the first to assess and compare the life cycle impacts of biomethane production from typical organic solid wastes via conventional and electroanaerobic digestion within the closed boundary system. The results showed that electro-anaerobic digestion outperformed anaerobic digestion in energy conversion and environmental impact. The energy consumption of electro-anaerobic digestion was reduced by 21.7%-42.6%, the carbon footprint was decreased by 18.0%-42.6%, and the energy conversion ratio was increased by 27.7%-74.3%, as compared to conventional anaerobic digestion. The highest energy conversion ratio (12.8) and the lowest global warming potential (39.6 g CO2-eq MJ-1) were obtained in the electro-anaerobic digestion of animal manure. Parasitic demand in biogas production was the primary energy consumption process in biomethane production from dry straw, while biogas upgrading was the most significant energy consumption process in other systems. Sensitivity analyses indicated that changes in specific methane yield impacted system performance most. The predicted carbon footprint reduction in the future electricity market demonstrated greenhouse gas emissions for produced biomethane as low as 6.2 g CO2-eq MJ-1 at complete decarbonization of electricity. As modelled, the theoretical resource of electroanaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes in China is 82.6% of the natural gas consumption. This study will provide scientific guidance for efficient methanization of organic solid waste for investment in energy projects.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [1] Production of solid biofuels from organic waste in developing countries: A review from sustainability and economic feasibility perspectives
    Angulo-Mosquera, Lina S.
    Alvarado-Alvarado, Allan A.
    Rivas-Arrieta, Maria J.
    Cattaneo, Carlos R.
    Rene, Eldon R.
    Garcia-Depraect, Octavio
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 795
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2021, International Energy Outlook 2021
  • [3] Agricultural and livestock sector's residues in Greece & China: Comparative qualitative and quantitative characterization for assessing their potential for biogas production
    Aravani, Vasiliki P.
    Sun, Hangyu
    Yang, Ziyi
    Liu, Guangqing
    Wang, Wen
    Anagnostopoulos, George
    Syriopoulos, George
    Charisiou, Nikolaos D.
    Goula, Maria A.
    Kornaros, Michael
    Papadakis, Vagelis G.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 154
  • [4] Township-based bioenergy systems for distributed energy supply and efficient household waste re-utilisation: Techno-economic and environmental feasibility
    Ascher, Simon
    Watson, Ian
    Wang, Xiaonan
    You, Siming
    [J]. ENERGY, 2019, 181 : 455 - 467
  • [5] Enhancing and upgrading biogas and biomethane production in anaerobic digestion: a comprehensive review
    Aworanti, Oluwafunmilayo Abiola
    Ajani, Ayobami Olu
    Agbede, Oluseye Omotoso
    Agarry, Samuel Enahoro
    Ogunkunle, Oyetola
    Laseinde, Opeyeolu Timothy
    Abul Kalam, Md
    Fattah, Islam Md Rizwanul
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2023, 11
  • [6] Banks C., 2018, IEA Bioenergy, V37, P12
  • [7] Analysis of the effects of domestic waste disposal methods on mucilage with life cycle assessment
    Bilgili, Levent
    Cetinkaya, Afsin Yusuf
    Sari, Mustafa
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2022, 180
  • [8] Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems -: Part 1:: Fuel-cycle emissions
    Börjesson, P
    Berglund, M
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2006, 30 (05) : 469 - 485
  • [9] Anaerobic bioconversion of food waste into energy: A critical review
    Braguglia, Camilla M.
    Gallipoli, Agata
    Gianico, Andrea
    Pagliaccia, Pamela
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 248 : 37 - 56
  • [10] Food waste valorization via anaerobic processes: a review
    Capson-Tojo, Gabriel
    Rouez, Maxime
    Crest, Marion
    Steyer, Jean-Philippe
    Delgenes, Jean-Philippe
    Escudie, Renaud
    [J]. REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND BIO-TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 15 (03) : 499 - 547