Paleoseismic Earthquake Recurrence Interval Derivation for the 2022 Revision of the New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model

被引:9
|
作者
Coffey, Genevieve L. [1 ]
Rollins, Chris [1 ]
Van Dissen, Russ J. [1 ]
Rhoades, David A. [1 ]
Gerstenberger, Matthew C. [1 ]
Litchfield, Nicola J. [1 ]
Thingbaijam, Kiran K. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] GNS Sci, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
关键词
SOUTHERN ALPINE FAULT; CONDITIONAL-PROBABILITY; RUPTURE; SLIP; VARIABILITY; DEVELOP; SEGMENT; ZONE;
D O I
10.1785/0220230197
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Recurrence intervals of ground-surface rupturing earthquakes are one of numerous datasets used to constrain the rates of fault ruptures in the 2022 revision of the New Zealand event displacement (SED) data in the New Zealand Paleoseismic Site Database version 1.0 alongside geologic and geodetic slip rates from the New Zealand Community Fault Model version 1.0 and NZ NSHM 2022 Geodetic Deformation Model were used to estimate recurrence intervals on faults across New Zealand for inclusion in the NZ NSHM 2022. Past earthquake timings were fit with lognormal, exponential, and Brownian Passage Time recurrence models to derive probability density functions (PDFs) of mean recurrence interval (MRI) in a Bayesian framework. At some sites, SED and slip-rate (SR) data were used to estimate PDFs of MRI; and at sites where timings, slip rate, and displacement data are available, the timings-based and slip-based PDFs were combined to develop tighter constraints on MRI. Using these approaches, we produce a database of maximum-likelihood MRIs and their uncertainties for 80 sites across New Zealand. The resulting recurrence interval dataset is publicly available and is the largest such dataset in New Zealand to date. It provides a valuable resource for future seismic hazard modeling and highlights areas that would benefit from future study.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 94
页数:17
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [31] A Hybrid Time-Dependent Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Model for Canterbury, New Zealand
    Gerstenberger, Matthew C.
    Rhoades, David A.
    McVerry, Graeme H.
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 87 (06) : 1311 - 1318
  • [32] The New Zealand Community Fault Model - version 1.0: an improved geological foundation for seismic hazard modelling
    Seebeck, Hannu
    Van Dissen, Russ
    Litchfield, Nicola
    Barnes, Philip M.
    Nicol, Andrew
    Langridge, Robert
    Barrell, David J. A.
    Villamor, Pilar
    Ellis, Susan
    Rattenbury, Mark
    Bannister, Stephen
    Gerstenberger, Matthew
    Ghisetti, Francesca
    Sutherland, Rupert
    Hirschberg, Hamish
    Fraser, Jeff
    Nodder, Scott D.
    Stirling, Mark
    Humphrey, Jade
    Bland, Kyle J.
    Howell, Andrew
    Mountjoy, Joshu
    Moon, Vicki
    Stahl, Timothy
    Spinardi, Francesca
    Townsend, Dougal
    Clark, Kate
    Hamling, Ian
    Cox, Simon
    de Lange, Willem
    Wopereis, Paul
    Johnston, Mike
    Morgenstern, Regine
    Coffey, Genevieve
    Eccles, Jennifer D.
    Little, Timothy
    Fry, Bill
    Griffin, Jonathan
    Townend, John
    Mortimer, Nick
    Alcaraz, Samantha
    Massiot, Cecile
    Rowland, Julie V.
    Muirhead, James
    Upton, Phaedra
    Lee, Julie
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS, 2024, 67 (02) : 209 - 229
  • [33] Revised Earthquake Geology Inputs for the Central and Eastern United States and Southeast Canada for the 2023 National Seismic Hazard Model
    Jobe, Jessica Thompson
    Hatem, Alexandra
    Gold, Ryan
    DuRoss, Christopher
    Reitman, Nadine
    Briggs, Richard
    Collett, Camille
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 93 (06) : 3100 - 3120
  • [34] Coseismic and postseismic deformation associated with the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikoura earthquake, New Zealand: fault movement investigation and seismic hazard analysis
    Zhongshan Jiang
    Dingfa Huang
    Linguo Yuan
    Abubakr Hassan
    Lupeng Zhang
    Zhongrong Yang
    Earth, Planets and Space, 70
  • [35] Coseismic and postseismic deformation associated with the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikoura earthquake, New Zealand: fault movement investigation and seismic hazard analysis
    Jiang, Zhongshan
    Huang, Dingfa
    Yuan, Linguo
    Hassan, Abubakr
    Zhang, Lupeng
    Yang, Zhongrong
    EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2018, 70
  • [36] Comparison between outcomes of the 2014 Earthquake Hazard Model of the Middle East (EMME14) and national seismic design codes: The case of Iran
    Kohrangi, Mohsen
    Danciu, Laurentiu
    Bazzurro, Paolo
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2018, 114 : 348 - 361
  • [37] A Short Term Seismic Hazard Assessment in Christchurch, New Zealand, After the M 7.1, 4 September 2010 Darfield Earthquake: An Application of a Smoothing Kernel and Rate-and-State Friction Model
    Chan, Chung-Han
    Wu, Yih-Min
    Lin, Ting-Li
    TERRESTRIAL ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCES, 2012, 23 (02): : 231 - 236
  • [38] A New On-Land Seismogenic Structure Source Database from the Taiwan Earthquake Model (TEM) Project for Seismic Hazard Analysis of Taiwan
    Shyu, J. Bruce H.
    Chuang, Yi-Rung
    Chen, Ya-Lin
    Lee, Yi-Rui
    Cheng, Chin-Tung
    TERRESTRIAL ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCES, 2016, 27 (03): : 311 - 323
  • [39] Earthquake Rupture Forecast Model Construction for the 2023 US 50-State National Seismic Hazard Model Update: Central and Eastern US Fault-Based Source Model
    Shumway, Allison M.
    Petersen, Mark D.
    Powers, Peter M.
    Toro, Gabriel
    Altekruse, Jason M.
    Herrick, Julie A.
    Rukstales, Kenneth S.
    Jobe, Jessica A. Thompson
    Hatem, Alexandra E.
    Girot, Demi L.
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 95 (2A) : 997 - 1029
  • [40] Rupture model of the 2013 MW 6.6 Lushan (China) earthquake constrained by a new GPS data set and its effects on potential seismic hazard
    Rumeng Guo
    Yong Zheng
    Faqi Diao
    Xiong Xiong
    Jiao Xu
    Earthquake Science, 2018, 31 (03) : 117 - 125