Prediction of hydrocarbons ignition performances using machine learning modeling

被引:3
|
作者
Flora, Giacomo [1 ]
Karimzadeh, Forood [1 ]
Kahandawala, Moshan S. P. [1 ]
Dewitt, Matthew J. [2 ]
Corporan, Edwin [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dayton, Res Inst, Power & Energy Div, Dayton, OH 45469 USA
[2] Univ Dayton, Fuels & Combust Div, Res Inst, Dayton, OH 45469 USA
[3] Air Force Res Lab, Aerosp Syst Directorate, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433 USA
关键词
Derived Cetane Number; GCxGC; Hydrocarbons; Machine Learning; Multivariate Regression Analysis; CHEMICAL-STRUCTURE; CETANE NUMBER; JET FUEL; DODECANE;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2024.131619
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study presents a computational methodology for determining the Derived Cetane Number (DCN) of practical aviation fuels. The proposed approach integrates a novel Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship (QSPR) model designed to predict DCN for hydrocarbon species and mixtures with fuel composition analysis obtained through Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography (GCxGC). The QSPR model used 20 independent variables computed based on selected hydrocarbon molecular descriptors, including functional groups and distance-based topological indexes. The multivariate regression analysis was used to train the QSPR model based on a dataset consisting of 48 individual hydrocarbon species and 157 surrogate mixtures. The model demonstrated robust predictive capabilities with high coefficients of determination (R2) 2 ) of 0.96 on the training dataset and 0.94 on the independent testing dataset. The latter consisted of 43 surrogate mixtures formulated both in-house and sourced from archived literature. The application of the QSPR model for practical jet fuels involves specifying the detailed jet fuel compositions using GCxGC analysis and a randomization algorithm based on a database featuring over 17,000 distinct hydrocarbon species. The overall model's performance on practical jet fuels aligns closely with its performance on the training and testing datasets, affirming its practical utility. To enhance prediction accuracy of the proposed computational approach for practical jet fuels, density was explored as a potential constraining property to narrow randomization results with those detailed composition having a density similar to the actual fuel. In this regard, a novel relationship was established to predict fuel densities based on compositional characteristics. Despite the promising results in density prediction, this study indicates that density alone is insufficient to effectively constrain randomized compositions for significantly improved DCN predictions, and thus, further development is required.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction of coal self-ignition tendency using machine learning
    Zhang, Lidong
    Song, Zeyang
    Wu, Dejian
    Luo, Zhenmin
    Zhao, Shanshan
    Wang, Yaohan
    Deng, Jun
    FUEL, 2022, 325
  • [2] Soot Emission Modeling of a Compression Ignition Engine Using Machine Learning
    Shahpouri, Saeid
    Norouzi, Armin
    Hayduk, Christopher
    Rezaei, Reza
    Shahbakhti, Mahdi
    Koch, Charles Robert
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2021, 54 (20): : 826 - 833
  • [3] Minimum Ignition Energy (MIE) prediction models for ignition sensitive fuels using machine learning methods
    Chaudhari, Purvali
    Ade, Nilesh
    Perez, Lisa M.
    Kolis, Stanley
    Mashuga, Chad V.
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2021, 69
  • [4] Predicting entropy and heat capacity of hydrocarbons using machine learning
    Aldosari, Mohammed N.
    Yalamanchi, Kiran K.
    Gao, Xin
    Sarathy, S. Mani
    ENERGY AND AI, 2021, 4
  • [5] Airfoil aerodynamic performance prediction using machine learning and surrogate modeling
    Teimourian, Amir
    Rohacs, Daniel
    Dimililer, Kamil
    Teimourian, Hanifa
    Yildiz, Melih
    Kale, Utku
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (08)
  • [6] Machine learning-assisted early ignition prediction in a complex flow
    Popov, Pavel P.
    Buchta, David A.
    Anderson, Michael J.
    Massa, Luca
    Capecelatro, Jesse
    Bodony, Daniel J.
    Freund, Jonathan B.
    COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2019, 206 : 451 - 466
  • [7] Machine learning for radiation outcome modeling and prediction
    Luo, Yi
    Chen, Shifeng
    Valdes, Gilmer
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (05) : E178 - E184
  • [8] A Comparison of GPU Execution Time Prediction using Machine Learning and Analytical Modeling
    Amaris, Marcos
    de Camargo, Raphael Y.
    Dyab, Mohamed
    Goldman, Alfredo
    Trystram, Denis
    15TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON NETWORK COMPUTING AND APPLICATIONS (IEEE NCA 2016), 2016, : 326 - 333
  • [9] Performance and power modeling and prediction using MuMMI and 10 machine learning methods
    Wu, Xingfu
    Taylor, Valerie
    Lan, Zhiling
    CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2023, 35 (15)
  • [10] Modeling and Prediction of Temporal Biogeomechanical Properties Using Novel Machine Learning Approach
    Kolawole, Oladoyin
    Assaad, Rayan H.
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2023, 56 (08) : 5635 - 5655