Diagnostic performance of MRI in detecting prostate cancer in patients with prostate-specific antigen levels of 4-10 ng/mL: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
作者
Guo, Erjia [1 ]
Xu, Lili [1 ]
Zhang, Daming [1 ]
Zhang, Jiahui [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoxiao [1 ]
Bai, Xin [1 ]
Chen, Li [1 ]
Peng, Qianyu [1 ]
Zhang, Gumuyang [1 ]
Jin, Zhengyu [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Hao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, State Key Lab Complex Severe & Rare Dis, Peking Union Med Coll,Dept Radiol, Shuaifuyuan 1,Wangfujing St, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Ctr Qual Control Radiol, Shuaifuyuan 1,Wangfujing St, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
基金
北京市自然科学基金;
关键词
Prostate neoplasms; Prostate-specific antigen; Magnetic resonance imaging; TEST ACCURACY; PSA-DENSITY; BIOPSY; GUIDELINES; PARAMETERS; IMPROVE; RATES; SCORE; MEN;
D O I
10.1186/s13244-024-01699-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate the diagnostic performance of MRI in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and prostate cancer (PCa) in patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of 4-10 ng/mL. Methods A computerized search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Medline, and Web of Science was conducted from inception until October 31, 2023. We included articles on the use of MRI to detect csPCa or PCa at 4-10 ng/mL PSA. The primary and secondary outcomes were MRI performance in csPCa and PCa detection, respectively; the estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were pooled in a bivariate random-effects model. Results Among the 19 studies (3879 patients), there were 10 (2205 patients) and 13 studies (2965 patients) that reported MRI for detecting csPCa or PCa, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for csPCa detection were 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.88) and 0.76 (95%CI, 0.65-0.84), respectively, for PCa detection were 0.82 (95%CI, 0.75-0.87) and 0.74 (95%CI, 0.65-0.82), respectively. The pooled NPV for csPCa detection was 0.91 (0.87-0.93). Biparametric magnetic resonance imaging also showed a significantly higher sensitivity and specificity relative to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (both p < 0.01). Conclusion Prostate MRI enables the detection of csPCa and PCa with satisfactory performance in the PSA gray zone. The excellent NPV for csPCa detection indicates the possibility of biopsy decision-making in patients in the PSA gray zone, but substantial heterogeneity among the included studies should be taken into account. Clinical relevance statement Prostate MRI can be considered a reliable and satisfactory tool for detecting csPCa and PCa in patients with PSA in the "gray zone", allowing for reducing unnecessary biopsy and optimizing the overall examination process.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Prostate Cancer Guideline
[2]   Combining Prostate-Specific Antigen Parameters With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score Version 2.0 to Improve Its Diagnostic Accuracy [J].
Baruah, Sasanka Kumar ;
Das, Nabajeet ;
Baruah, Saumar Jyoti ;
Rajeev, T. P. ;
Bagchi, Puskal Kumar ;
Sharma, Debanga ;
Phukan, Mandeep .
WORLD JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 10 (06) :218-225
[3]   Impact of prostate imaging quality (PI-QUAL) score on the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer at biopsy [J].
Brembilla, Giorgio ;
Lavalle, Salvatore ;
Parry, Tom ;
Cosenza, Michele ;
Russo, Tommaso ;
Mazzone, Elio ;
Pellegrino, Francesco ;
Stabile, Armando ;
Gandaglia, Giorgio ;
Briganti, Alberto ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Esposito, Antonio ;
De Cobelli, Francesco .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 164
[4]   Cutoff Values of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1 Score in Men With Prostate-specific Antigen Level 4 to 10 ng/mL: Importance of Lesion Location [J].
Chen, Yuanchong ;
Ruan, Mingjian ;
Zhou, Binyi ;
Hu, Xuege ;
Wang, Hao ;
Liu, Hua ;
Liu, Jia ;
Song, Gang .
CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2021, 19 (04) :288-295
[5]   The combined role of MRI prostate and prostate health index in improving detection of significant prostate cancer in a screening population of Chinese men [J].
Chiu, Peter K. F. ;
Lam, Thomas Y. T. ;
Ng, Chi-Fai ;
Teoh, Jeremy Y. C. ;
Cho, Carmen C. M. ;
Hung, Hiu-Yee ;
Hong, Cindy ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
Chu, Winnie C. W. ;
Wong, Samuel Y. S. ;
Sung, Joseph J. Y. .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2023, 25 (06) :674-679
[6]   Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With Biparametric MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Cuocolo, Renato ;
Verde, Francesco ;
Ponsiglione, Andrea ;
Romeo, Valeria ;
Petretta, Mario ;
Imbriaco, Massimo ;
Stanzione, Arnaldo .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 216 (03) :608-621
[7]   PSA-density does not improve bi-parametric prostate MR detection of prostate cancer in a biopsy naive patient population [J].
Cuocolo, Renato ;
Stanzione, Arnaldo ;
Rusconi, Giovanni ;
Petretta, Mario ;
Ponsiglione, Andrea ;
Fusco, Ferdinando ;
Longo, Nicola ;
Persico, Francesco ;
Cocozza, Sirio ;
Brunetti, Arturo ;
Imbriaco, Massimo .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 104 :64-70
[8]   The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed [J].
Deeks, JJ ;
Macaskill, P ;
Irwig, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (09) :882-893
[9]   Prebiopsy multiparametric MRI-based risk score for predicting prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men with prostate-specific antigen between 4-10ng/mL [J].
Dwivedi, Durgesh Kumar ;
Kumar, Rajeev ;
Dwivedi, Alok Kumar ;
Bora, Girdhar S. ;
Thulkar, Sanjay ;
Sharma, Sanjay ;
Gupta, Siddhartha Datta ;
Jagannathan, Naranamangalam R. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 47 (05) :1227-1236
[10]   Comparison of Targeted vs Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men Who Are Biopsy Naive: The Prospective Assessment of Image Registration in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PAIREDCAP) Study [J].
Elkhoury, Fuad F. ;
Felker, Ely R. ;
Kwan, Lorna ;
Sisk, Anthony E. ;
Delfin, Merdie ;
Natarajan, Shyam ;
Marks, Leonard S. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2019, 154 (09) :811-818