Deep learning model utilizing clinical data alone outperforms image-based model for hernia recurrence following abdominal wall reconstruction with long-term follow up

被引:2
作者
Wilson, Hadley H. [1 ]
Ma, Chiyu [2 ]
Ku, Dau [1 ]
Scarola, Gregory T. [1 ]
Augenstein, Vedra A. [1 ]
Colavita, Paul D. [1 ]
Heniford, B. Todd [1 ]
机构
[1] Carolinas Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Gastrointestinal & Minimally Invas Surg, 1025 Morehead Med Dr Suite 300, Charlotte, NC 28204 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Stat Sci, Durham, NC USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2024年 / 38卷 / 07期
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Ventral hernia; Abdominal wall reconstruction; Hernia recurrence; INCISIONAL HERNIA; REPAIR; INFERIOR; OUTCOMES; MESH;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-024-10980-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Deep learning models (DLMs) using preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging have shown promise in predicting outcomes following abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR), including component separation, wound complications, and pulmonary failure. This study aimed to apply these methods in predicting hernia recurrence and to evaluate if incorporating additional clinical data would improve the DLM's predictive ability. Methods Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained single-institution database. Those who underwent AWR with available preoperative CTs were included, and those with < 18 months of follow up were excluded. Patients were separated into a training (80%) set and a testing (20%) set. A DLM was trained on the images only, and another DLM was trained on demographics only: age, sex, BMI, diabetes, and history of tobacco use. A mixed-value DLM incorporated data from both. The DLMs were evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) in predicting recurrence. Results The models evaluated data from 190 AWR patients with a 14.7% recurrence rate after an average follow up of more than 7 years (mean +/- SD: 86 +/- 39 months; median [Q1, Q3]: 85.4 [56.1, 113.1]). Patients had a mean age of 57.5 +/- 12.3 years and were majority (65.8%) female with a BMI of 34.2 +/- 7.9 kg/m2. There were 28.9% with diabetes and 16.8% with a history of tobacco use. The AUCs for the imaging DLM, clinical DLM, and combined DLM were 0.500, 0.667, and 0.604, respectively. Conclusions The clinical-only DLM outperformed both the image-only DLM and the mixed-value DLM in predicting recurrence. While all three models were poorly predictive of recurrence, the clinical-only DLM was the most predictive. These findings may indicate that imaging characteristics are not as useful for predicting recurrence as they have been for other AWR outcomes. Further research should focus on understanding the imaging characteristics that are identified by these DLMs and expanding the demographic information incorporated in the clinical-only DLM to further enhance the predictive ability of this model.
引用
收藏
页码:3984 / 3991
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Linear versus volumetric CT analysis in predicting tension-free fascial closure in abdominal wall reconstruction
    Al-Mansour, M. R.
    Wu, J.
    Gagnon, G.
    Knee, A.
    Romanelli, J. R.
    Seymour, N. E.
    [J]. HERNIA, 2021, 25 (01) : 91 - 98
  • [2] Predicting rare outcomes in abdominal wall reconstruction using image-based deep learning models
    Ayuso, Sullivan A.
    Elhage, Sharbel A.
    Zhang, Yizi
    Aladegbami, Bola G.
    Gersin, Keith S.
    Fischer, John P.
    Augenstein, Vedra A.
    Colavita, Paul D.
    Heniford, Todd
    [J]. SURGERY, 2023, 173 (03) : 748 - 755
  • [3] Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repairs: 5 year recurrence rates
    Ballem, Naveen
    Parikh, Rikesh
    Berber, Eren
    Siperstein, Alan
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (09): : 1935 - 1940
  • [4] Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Risk Stratification Tools: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Bernardi, Karla
    Adrales, Gina L.
    Hope, William W.
    Keith, Jerrod
    Kuhlens, Heidi
    Martindale, Robert G.
    Melin, Alyson A.
    Orenstein, Sean B.
    Roth, John Scott
    Shah, Shinil K.
    Tsuda, Shawn
    Liang, Mike K.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 142 (03) : 9S - 20S
  • [5] Computed tomographic measurements predict component separation in ventral hernia repair
    Blair, Laurel J.
    Ross, Samuel W.
    Huntington, Ciara R.
    Watkins, John D.
    Prasad, Tanushree
    Lincourt, Amy E.
    Augenstein, Vedra A.
    Heniford, B. Todd
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 199 (02) : 420 - 427
  • [6] ROC-ing along: Evaluation and interpretation of receiver operating characteristic curves
    Carter, Jane V.
    Pan, Jiamnin
    Rai, Shesh N.
    Galandiuk, Susan
    [J]. SURGERY, 2016, 159 (06) : 1638 - 1645
  • [7] Introduction to Machine Learning, Neural Networks, and Deep Learning
    Choi, Rene Y.
    Coyner, Aaron S.
    Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree
    Chiang, Michael F.
    Campbell, J. Peter
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 9 (02):
  • [8] Patient quality of life before and after ventral hernia repair
    Ciomperlik, Hailie
    Dhanani, Naila H.
    Cassata, Nicolas
    Mohr, Cassandra
    Bernardi, Karla
    Holihan, Julie L.
    Lyons, Nicole
    Olavarria, Oscar
    Ko, Tien C.
    Liang, Mike K.
    [J]. SURGERY, 2021, 169 (05) : 1158 - 1163
  • [9] Predictive modeling for chronic pain after ventral hernia repair
    Cox, Tiffany C.
    Huntington, Ciara R.
    Blair, Laurel J.
    Prasad, Tanushree
    Lincourt, Amy E.
    Heniford, Brant T.
    Augenstein, Vedra A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 212 (03) : 501 - 510
  • [10] Open retromuscular mesh repair versus onlay technique of incisional hernia: A randomized controlled trial
    Demetrashvili, Zaza
    Pipia, Irakli
    Loladze, David
    Metreveli, Tamar
    Ekaladze, Eka
    Kenchadze, George
    Khutsishvili, Kakhi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 37 : 65 - 70