An improved minimum 1-D VP velocity model in the onshore-offshore area of the Pearl River estuary from 3-D active-source seismic experiment

被引:0
作者
Wang L.-W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang B.-S. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Ye X.-W. [2 ,3 ]
Zhang Y.-P. [1 ]
Wang X.-N. [2 ,3 ]
Lü Z.-Y. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing
[2] CEA Key Laboratory of Earthquake Monitoring and Disaster Mitigation Technology, Guangdong Earthquake Agency, Guangzhou
[3] Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Earthquake Early Warning and Safety Diagnosis of Major Projects, Guangdong Earthquake Agency, Guangzhou
[4] School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
[5] Mengcheng National Geophysical Observatory, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
来源
Dizhen Dizhi | 2021年 / 43卷 / 01期
关键词
Minimum 1-D velocity model; Onshore-offshore seismic experiment; Pearl River Estuary; Station corrections;
D O I
10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2021.01.008
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Layered 1-D velocity models are widely used in seismic network routine locations and in seismological studies, such as earthquake relocation, focal mechanism inversion, synthetic seismogram calculation and geodynamics simulation. It's also used as a reference model for 2-D and 3-D tomographic inversions. Therefore, obtaining a more reliable 1-D velocity model is an extremely important work for the study of earthquake source parameters and seismic tomography. The onshore-offshore area of the Pearl River Estuary is located at the transition zone between South China block and South China Sea bock, the special ocean-land transitional crustal type and the littoral fault zone, which is the regional seismic control structure passing through it, makes it a potential seismic source. Meanwhile, the Pearl River Delta has the most developed economy and dense population in South China. However, the 1-D velocity model used in seismic network routine operations has not been updated since 1990. To investigate the seismic structure and potential strong earthquake risk in this area, we conducted a 3-D active source seismic experiment in 2015, which incorporated sea-based airgun sources and land-based dynamite sources, and seismic recorders both at the onshore and offshore area in the Pearl River Estuary. A high quality subset of the data was used to derive an improved 1-D seismic VP model for seismological studies. The model is constructed using the VELEST program with first arrival P-wave travel time data, together with station corrections, which account for shallow velocity anomalies from the true velocity model. The reliability of our new model is assessed by good fitting of the travel time data of airguns and dynamites and better earthquake relocation results. The final 1-D model provides a good fit for travel time data. After iterative inversion, the root-mean-square travel-time error is 0.07s in the onshore area and 0.21s in the offshore area. Within 6km top of the model, the P-wave velocity of onshore area is 5.22~5.99km/s, and the offshore area is obviously lower, which is 2.11~6.03km/s. The retrieved values are in agreement with the thick sedimentary basins in the Pearl River Estuary Basin whose velocity is obvious lower. Then the velocity smoothly increases with depth, within the depth range of 6~15km, the P-wave velocity of onshore area is slightly lower than the offshore area, which may be due to the wide-spread low velocity layer at the middle crust depth in South China Block. Below the depth of 15km, the P-wave velocity of offshore area is greater than that of the onshore area, which is consistent with the high velocity layer in the base of the thinned continental crust and the gradually uplifting of Moho depth seaward as reported in the previous studies. The spatial distribution of station corrections correlates well with the near-surface structure and geological features. In the area onshore of the Pearl River Estuary, positive values of station corrections are mostly observed in correspondence with the Pearl River Delta sedimentary basins due to its lower velocity values, such as Sanshui Sag, Shunde Sag and Dongguan Sag, etc. While stations located in granite, limestone and metamorphic rocks outcropping area show early P-wave arrivals(negative station corrections). In the area offshore of the Pearl River Estuary, the spatial distribution of station corrections shows a significant lateral variation and 80%larger than the onshore area. It has a good spatial correlation with the buried depth of the sedimentary basement inverted by reflection seismic survey, where the deposits are thicker, the station corrections are positive, the underground medium presents a low velocity, and vice versa. Negative values of station corrections are observed northwest of the NE-trending littoral fault zone, while positive values correspond to the thick sedimentary basins in the Pearl River Estuary Basin southeast of the littoral fault zone. At last, we relocated 425 earthquakes in the onshore area and 234 earthquakes in the offshore area with ML≥0.0 using simul2000 algorithm. The result shows that our new model is better than the South China model, the seismic travel time residual after relocation is greatly reduced, the land P wave residual is reduced by 22.6%, and the S wave is reduced by 21.2%. The sea P wave residual is reduced by 25.7%, and the S wave is reduced by 15.6%. The new model is better for regional earthquake location. We provide a more reliable VP velocity model, which can be used to earthquake location, earthquake source parameter inversion and 3-D velocity model studies in the Pearl River Estuary. © 2021, Editorial Office of Seismology and Geology. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 143
页数:20
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] CAO Jing-he, SUN Jin-long, XU Hui-long, Et al., Seismological features of the littoral fault zone in the Pearl River Estuary, Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 57, 2, pp. 498-508, (2014)
  • [2] CHEN Han-zong, WU Xiang-jie, ZHOU Di, Et al., Meso-Cenozoic faults in Zhujiang River Mouth Basin and their geodynamic background, Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 24, 2, pp. 52-61, (2005)
  • [3] DENG Yang-fan, LI Shou-lin, FAN Wei-ming, Et al., Crustal structure beneath South China revealed by deep seismic soundings and its dynamics implications, Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 54, 10, pp. 2560-2574, (2011)
  • [4] DING Yuan-zhang, The active faults and the seismic activity in the Pearl River Mouth Basin and its vicinity areas, Earthquake Research in China, 10, 4, pp. 307-319, (1994)
  • [5] FAN Yu-lan, LIN Ji-zeng, HU Rui-he, Et al., The development of travel timetable for near earthquake in South China, South China Seismological Journal, 10, 2, pp. 1-16, (1990)
  • [6] FANG Nian-qiao, YAO Bo-chu, WAN Ling, Et al., The velocity structure of the lithosphere and the origin of sedimentary basins in the South China and northern margin of the South China Sea, Earth Science(Journal of China University of Geosciences), 32, 2, pp. 147-154, (2007)
  • [7] LEI Xing-lin, MA Sheng-li, SU Jin-rong, Et al., Inelastic triggering of the 2013 M<sub>W</sub>6.6 Lushan earthquake by the 2008 M<sub>W</sub>7.9 Wenchuan earthquake, Seismology and Geology, 35, 2, pp. 411-422, (2013)
  • [8] LIANG Gan, WU Ye-biao, ZHANG Lin-yun, Et al., Active Fault Detection and Seismic Risk Assessment in Guangzhou, (2013)
  • [9] MA Li-fang, QIAO Xiu-fu, MIN Long-rui, Et al., Geological Atlas of China, pp. 253-260, (2002)
  • [10] QIU Xue-lin, ZHAO Ming-hui, XU Hui-long, Et al., Important processes of deep seismic surveys in the South China Sea: Retrospection and expectation, Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 31, 3, pp. 1-9, (2012)