Hydraulic Coupling Triaxial Test of Sandstone under Cyclic Loading Action

被引:0
作者
Zhou X. [1 ]
Guo D. [1 ]
Yu J. [2 ]
Zhang X. [2 ]
Cao P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen
[2] Fujian Research Center for Tunnelling and Urban Underground Space Engineering, Huaqiao Univ, Xiamen
[3] University of Florida, Gainesville, 32611, FL
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
cyclic loading and unloading; damage model; hydraulic coupling; permeability; sandstone;
D O I
10.25103/jestr.143.25
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In deep underground engineering, surrounding rocks are subjected to cyclic loading and become prone to fractures due to the seepage pressure. To explore the mechanical properties, damage evolution, and permeability response characteristics of sandstone under cyclic loading action, three tests, namely, monotonic loading hydraulic coupling, constant amplitude and variable amplitude cyclic loading and unloading tests, were performed in this work. The mechanical characteristics, damage evolution, and permeability response characteristics of sandstone were then analyzed. Results show that, 1) under the monotonic loading hydraulic coupling action, the elasticity modulus of sandstone increases along with the confining pressure and decreases along with an increasing osmotic pressure, whereas the change in its strength is positively correlated to the elasticity modulus; 2) Given the limited compressible volume of broken sandstone, its permeability significantly decreases along with increasing confining pressure. Given that the permeable channels are changed along with the crack development laws under cyclic loading, the permeability change of sandstone after the yield stage differs from that under the conventional loading action, and the failure mode is classified as tensile-shear mixed failure; 3) A damage variable model of cyclic disturbance under cyclic loading-hydraulic coupling action was established. The conclusions obtained in the study provide references for deep underground engineering construction. © 2021 School of Science, IHU. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 228
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Scesi L., Gattinoni P., Roughness control on hydraulic conductivity in fractured rocks, Hydrogeology Journal, 15, 2, pp. 201-211, (2013)
[2]  
Hajjar A., Scholtes L., Oltean C., Bues M. A., Effects of the geometry of two‐dimensional fractures on their hydraulic aperture and on the validity of the local cubic law, Hydrological Processes, 32, 16, pp. 2510-2525, (2018)
[3]  
Zhao C., Xing J. Q., Niu J. L., Ma C. C., Experimental study on crack propagation of precrack rock-like specimens under hydro-mechanical coupling, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 38, S1, pp. 2823-2830, (2019)
[4]  
Rezaee R., Saeedi A., Clennell B., Tight gas sands permeability estimation from mercury injection capillary pressure and nuclear magnetic resonance data, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 88-89, pp. 92-99, (2012)
[5]  
Connell L. D., Mazumder S., Sander R., Camilleri M., Pan Z. J., Heryanto D., Laboratory characterisation of coal matrix shrinkage, cleat compressibility and the geomechanical properties determining reservoir permeability, Fuel, 165, pp. 499-512, (2016)
[6]  
Li G., Tang C. A., Li L. C., Advances in rock deformation and failure process under water-rock coupling, Advances in Mechanics, 42, pp. 593-619, (2012)
[7]  
Rutqvist J., Stephansson O., The role of hydromechanical coupling in fractured rock engineering, Hydrogeology Journal, 11, 1, pp. 7-40, (2003)
[8]  
Guo K. L., Yang L., Sheng X. C., Mei J., Xiang L. B., Zhang B., Yang W. M., Song G. X., Fracture mechanical behavior and AE characteristics of rock-like material containing 3-D crack under hydro-mechanical coupling, Rock and Soil Mechanics, 40, 11, pp. 4380-4390, (2019)
[9]  
Selvadurai A. P. S., Normal stress‐induced permeability hysteresis of a fracture in a granite cylinder, Geofluids, 15, 1-2, pp. 37-47, (2015)
[10]  
Al-Yaseri A., Zhang Y. H., Ghasemiziarani M., Sarmadivaleh M., Lebedev M., Roshan H., Iglauer S., Permeability Evolution in Sandstone due to CO2 Injection, Energy & Fuels, 31, 11, pp. 12390-12398, (2017)