Susceptibility-Weighted MRI for Predicting NF-2 Mutations and S100 Protein Expression in Meningiomas

被引:1
作者
Azamat, Sena [1 ,2 ]
Buz-Yalug, Buse [1 ]
Dindar, Sukru Samet [3 ]
Yilmaz Tan, Kubra [4 ,5 ]
Ozcan, Alpay [3 ]
Can, Ozge [6 ]
Ersen Danyeli, Ayca [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Pamir, M. Necmettin [8 ,10 ]
Dincer, Alp [8 ,9 ,11 ]
Ozduman, Koray [8 ,9 ,10 ]
Ozturk-Isik, Esin [1 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Bogazici Univ, Inst Biomed Engn, TR-34342 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Basaksehir Cam & Sakura City Hosp, TR-34480 Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Bogazici Univ, Elect & Elect Engn Dept, TR-34342 Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Acibadem Univ, Dept Med Biotechnol, TR-34752 Istanbul, Turkiye
[5] Univ Gothenburg, Inst Neurosci & Physiol, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Psychiat & Neurochem, S-42130 Molndal, Sweden
[6] Acibadem Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, TR-34752 Istanbul, Turkiye
[7] Acibadem Univ, Dept Med Pathol, TR-34752 Istanbul, Turkiye
[8] Acibadem Univ, Ctr Neuroradiol Applicat & Res, TR-34752 Istanbul, Turkiye
[9] Acibadem Univ, Brain Tumor Res Grp, TR-34752 Istanbul, Turkiye
[10] Acibadem Univ, Dept Psychol, TR-34752 Istanbul, Turkiye
[11] Acibadem Univ, Dept Psychol, TR-34752 Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
machine learning; meningioma; NF-2; mutations; S100 protein expression; susceptibility-weighted MRI; PERITUMORAL BRAIN EDEMA; NF2; GENE; GRADE; CLASSIFICATION; CALCIFICATION; SYSTEM; TUMORS;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics14070748
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
S100 protein expression levels and neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF-2) mutations result in different disease courses in meningiomas. This study aimed to investigate non-invasive biomarkers of NF-2 copy number loss and S100 protein expression in meningiomas using morphological, radiomics, and deep learning-based features of susceptibility-weighted MRI (SWI). This retrospective study included 99 patients with S100 protein expression data and 92 patients with NF-2 copy number loss information. Preoperative cranial MRI was conducted using a 3T clinical MR scanner. Tumor volumes were segmented on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and subsequent registration of FLAIR to high-resolution SWI was performed. First-order textural features of SWI were extracted and assessed using Pyradiomics. Morphological features, including the tumor growth pattern, peritumoral edema, sinus invasion, hyperostosis, bone destruction, and intratumoral calcification, were semi-quantitatively assessed. Mann-Whitney U tests were utilized to assess the differences in the SWI features of meningiomas with and without S100 protein expression or NF-2 copy number loss. A logistic regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between these features and the respective subgroups. Additionally, a convolutional neural network (CNN) was used to extract hierarchical features of SWI, which were subsequently employed in a light gradient boosting machine classifier to predict the NF-2 copy number loss and S100 protein expression. NF-2 copy number loss was associated with a higher risk of developing high-grade tumors. Additionally, elevated signal intensity and a decrease in entropy within the tumoral region on SWI were observed in meningiomas with S100 protein expression. On the other hand, NF-2 copy number loss was associated with lower SWI signal intensity, a growth pattern described as "en plaque", and the presence of calcification within the tumor. The logistic regression model achieved an accuracy of 0.59 for predicting NF-2 copy number loss and an accuracy of 0.70 for identifying S100 protein expression. Deep learning features demonstrated a strong predictive capability for S100 protein expression (AUC = 0.85 +/- 0.06) and had reasonable success in identifying NF-2 copy number loss (AUC = 0.74 +/- 0.05). In conclusion, SWI showed promise in identifying NF-2 copy number loss and S100 protein expression by revealing neovascularization and microcalcification characteristics in meningiomas.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 64 条
[11]   The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems [J].
Fisher, RA .
ANNALS OF EUGENICS, 1936, 7 :179-188
[12]   Role of susceptibility-weighted imaging and intratumoral susceptibility signals in grading and differentiating pediatric brain tumors at 1.5 T: a preliminary study [J].
Gaudino, Simona ;
Marziali, Giammaria ;
Pezzullo, Giovanna ;
Guadalupi, Pamela ;
Giordano, Carolina ;
Infante, Amato ;
Benenati, Massimo ;
Ramaglia, Antonia ;
Massimi, Luca ;
Gessi, Marco ;
Frassanito, Paolo ;
Caldarelli, Massimo ;
Colosimo, Cesare .
NEURORADIOLOGY, 2020, 62 (06) :705-713
[13]   Long-term follow-up of 287 meningiomas in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: clinical, radiological, and molecular features [J].
Goutagny, Stphane ;
Bah, Alpha Boubacar ;
Henin, Dominique ;
Parfait, Beatrice ;
Grayeli, Alexis Bozorg ;
Sterkers, Olivier ;
Kalamarides, Michel .
NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2012, 14 (08) :1090-1096
[14]   Differentiating meningioma grade by imaging features on magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Hale, Andrew T. ;
Wang, Li ;
Strother, Megan K. ;
Chambless, Lola B. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 48 :71-75
[15]   Susceptibility-weighted Imaging: Technical Essentials and Clinical Neurologic Applications [J].
Haller, Sven ;
Haacke, E. Mark ;
Thurnher, Majda M. ;
Barkhof, Frederik .
RADIOLOGY, 2021, 299 (01) :3-26
[16]   Prediction of meningioma grade by constructing a clinical radiomics model nomogram based on magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Han, Tao ;
Liu, Xianwang ;
Long, Changyou ;
Xu, Zhendong ;
Geng, Yayuan ;
Zhang, Bin ;
Deng, Liangna ;
Jing, Mengyuan ;
Zhou, Junlin .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2023, 104 :16-22
[17]  
Hancq S, 2004, INT J ONCOL, V25, P1233
[18]   S100A5: a marker of recurrence in WHO grade I meningiomas [J].
Hancq, S ;
Salmon, I ;
Brotchi, J ;
De Witte, O ;
Gabius, HJ ;
Heinzmann, CW ;
Kiss, R ;
Decaestecker, C .
NEUROPATHOLOGY AND APPLIED NEUROBIOLOGY, 2004, 30 (02) :178-187
[19]  
Hastie T., 2009, The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction
[20]   Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition [J].
He, Kaiming ;
Zhang, Xiangyu ;
Ren, Shaoqing ;
Sun, Jian .
2016 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2016, :770-778