Status enhancement and attention-seeking in the transatlantic relationship: the Visegrad states and the Trump administration

被引:0
作者
Hornat J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of North American Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University, U Krize 8
关键词
Donald Trump; Status; Transatlantic relations; US foreign policy; Visegrad;
D O I
10.1057/s42738-023-00110-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In 2016 the Visegrad states' political representatives were seemingly more comfortable with the election of Donald Trump than their Western EU counterparts. Though this geographical rift among EU members in accepting the Trump administration can be viewed partly through ideological proximity of contemporary Visegrad governments to the Trump agenda, this article argues that the matter should be analyzed through the prism of status enhancement. The V4 states are still perceived as new members and even “junior partners” within the Transatlantic community, burdened with the post-communist semi-peripheral position in the global economy, and have felt deprived of attention from their most significant peer partner—the US—during previous presidential administrations. The Trump administration presented a unique window of opportunity for the Visegrad states to remind the USA of their persisting partnership and contribution to the survival of the Transatlantic community through various substantive initiatives. On the case of status-enhancing behavior of the Visegrad states during the Trump presidency, the paper introduces three attention-seeking mechanisms—agenda co-option, ideational alignment and partnership concessions—employed by the respective governments. The paper argues that the V4 states individually sought attention from the Trump administration, which hence served as a social reinforcer of their relevance and worth for the Transatlantic club, but also as part of domestic political legitimation. © The Editor of the Journal 2024.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 221
页数:24
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [21] Istok R., Kozarova I., Polackova A., The Intermarium as a Polish Geopolitical Concept in History and in the Present, Geopolitics, 26, 1, pp. 314-341, (2021)
  • [22] Jakobsen P., Ringsmose J., Saxi H., Prestige-Seeking Small States: Danish and Norwegian Military Contributions to US-Led Operations, European Journal of International Security, 3, 2, pp. 256-277, (2018)
  • [23] Janebova P., Vegh Z., Trends of Visegrad Foreign Policy, (2019)
  • [24] Kent A., China’s International Socialization: The Role of International Organizations, Global Governance, 8, 3, pp. 343-364, (2002)
  • [25] Kugiel P., V4 Goes Global: Exploring Opportunities and Obstacles in the Visegrad Countries’ cooperation with Brazil, India, China and South Africa, (2016)
  • [26] Kurucz M., Hungary–United States Relations under Obama and Trump Administration, Politické Vedy, 2, pp. 98-113, (2020)
  • [27] Larson D.W., Paul T.V., Wohlforth W.C., Status and World Order. In Status in World Politics, pp. 3-29, (2014)
  • [28] Larson D.W., Shevchenko A., Quest for Status: Chinese and Russian Foreign Policy, (2019)
  • [29] Mcauliffe A., Poland, Trying to Punch Above Its Weight Class in NATO, The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 13, 4, pp. 1-28, (2000)
  • [30] Mitzen J., Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma, European Journal of International Relations, 12, 3, pp. 341-370, (2006)