Quality of Life after Treatment for Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Real-World Study: Recommendations, Vaginal Pessary, and Surgery

被引:0
作者
Mancinskiene, Dominyka [1 ]
Mikenaite, Migle [2 ]
Barakat, Mark [2 ]
Kacerauskiene, Justina [1 ]
Railaite, Dalia Regina [1 ]
Maleckiene, Laima [1 ]
Bartusevicius, Arnoldas [1 ]
Bartuseviciene, Egle [1 ]
机构
[1] Lithuanian Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
[2] Lithuanian Univ Hlth Sci, Fac Med, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2024年 / 60卷 / 04期
关键词
pelvic organ prolapse; pessary; surgery; recommendations; global improvement; quality of life; WOMEN;
D O I
10.3390/medicina60040547
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition in women, with its prevalence increasing with age, and can significantly impact the quality of life (QOL) of many individuals. The objective of this study was to assess the overall improvement, quality of life, and continuation of primary treatment for POP over a 24-month period in a real-world setting. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective, observational, follow-up study of women with symptomatic POP who, as a primary treatment, opted for recommendations (lifestyle changes and pelvic floor muscle training), pessary therapy, or surgery. The primary outcome measure was a subjective improvement at the 24-month follow-up, measured with the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale. Secondary outcome measures were the continuation rate of the primary treatment method, reason for discontinuation, and the quality of life evaluated with the P-QoL questionnaire. Results: We included 137 women, with 45 women (32.8%) in the recommendations group, 39 (28.5%) in the pessary group, and 53 women (38.7%) in the surgery group. After 24 months, surgery, in comparison with pessary treatment and recommendations, resulted in significantly more women reporting a subjective improvement: 89.6%, 66.7%, and 22.9% (p < 0.001), respectively. Overall, 52% of women from the recommendations group and 36.4% from the pessary group switched to another treatment or discontinued the primary treatment within 24 months. However, women who continued the primary treatment, pessary use, and surgery showed similar subjective improvements (90.5% and 89.6%, respectively) and quality-of-life improvement. Conclusions: The chance of significant improvement was higher following surgery. However, after 24 months, both vaginal pessaries and surgery showed an important quality-of life improvement and can be proposed as primary treatment methods for pelvic organ prolapse.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Prospective evaluation of outcome of vaginal pessaries versus surgery in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse [J].
Abdool, Zeelha ;
Thakar, Ranee ;
Sultan, Abdul H. ;
Oliver, Reeba S. .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2011, 22 (03) :273-278
[2]   Quality of Life After Treatment for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Vaginal Pessary versus Surgery [J].
Aimjirakul, Komkrit ;
Pumtako, Mintita ;
Manonai, Jittima .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2023, 15 :1017-1025
[3]   Quality of life and vaginal symptoms of postmenopausal women using pessary for pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective study [J].
Albuquerque Coelho, Suelene C. ;
Marangoni-Junior, Marcos ;
Oliveira Brito, Luiz Gustavo ;
de Castro, Edilson Benedito ;
Teatin Juliato, Cassia Raquel .
REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2018, 64 (12) :1103-1107
[4]   Impact of a vaginal pessary on the quality of life in women with pelvic organ prolapse [J].
Anantawat, Tisana ;
Manonai, Jittma ;
Wattanayingcharoenchai, Rujira ;
Sarit-apirak, Sirirat .
ASIAN BIOMEDICINE, 2016, 10 (03) :249-252
[5]   Comparison of 2 Transvaginal Surgical Approaches and Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Apical Vaginal Prolapse The OPTIMAL Randomized Trial [J].
Barber, Matthew D. ;
Brubaker, Linda ;
Burgio, Kathryn L. ;
Richter, Holly E. ;
Nygaard, Ingrid ;
Weidner, Alison C. ;
Menefee, Shawn A. ;
Lukacz, Emily S. ;
Norton, Peggy ;
Schaffer, Joseph ;
Nguyen, John N. ;
Borello-France, Diane ;
Goode, Patricia S. ;
Jakus-Waldman, Sharon ;
Spino, Cathie ;
Warren, Lauren Klein ;
Gantz, Marie G. ;
Meikle, Susan F. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (10) :1023-1034
[6]   Prolapse surgery versus vaginal pessary in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: which factors influence the choice of treatment? [J].
Bodner-Adler, Barbara ;
Bodner, Klaus ;
Stinglmeier, Anna ;
Kimberger, Oliver ;
Halpern, Ksenia ;
Koelbl, Heinz ;
Umek, Wolfgang .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2019, 299 (03) :773-777
[7]   Does self-management of vaginal pessaries improve care for women with pelvic organ prolapse? [J].
Bugge, Carol ;
Dembinsky, Melanie ;
Kearney, Rohna ;
Hagen, Suzanne .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 372
[8]  
Bugge C, 2020, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14551858.CD004010.pub4, 10.1002/14651858.CD004010.pub4]
[9]   Primary treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: pessary use versus prolapse surgery [J].
Coolen, Anne-Lotte W. M. ;
Troost, Stephanie ;
Mol, Ben Willem J. ;
Roovers, Jan-Paul W. R. ;
Bongers, Marlies Y. .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 29 (01) :99-107
[10]   Female pelvic organ prolapse using pessaries: systematic review [J].
de Albuquerque Coelho, Suelene Costa ;
de Castro, Edilson Benedito ;
Juliato, Cassia Raquel Teatin .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 27 (12) :1797-1803